Conclusions
Throughout the year the girls maintained the progress made in the first school and continued to develop their ability to implement physical science concepts in their modelling work. They reached a point sometime during year 4 when collectively they achieved parity with the boys in this respect. By the end of the year there were more concepts put into practice with greater frequency by girls than by boys as groups. Although it took a long time to reach this point it was achieved through practices compatible with normal teaching using materials easily available in school.
Analysis of the models under the two criteria of variety and creativity showed that despite the greater frequency which girls incorporated physical concepts into the models made there was still a tendency for them to be conservative. They chose to make models which were the same as those illustrated on the work cards or those produced by other girls. Despite the fact that they made more models than the boys the range of models made by girls was smaller. Girls were also less likely to be creative They did not often modify their models by adding elements of their own design and rarely developed designs of their own in contrast to the boys which were often original and innovative.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Brown, C. A. (1991) ‘Using construction sets in a primary curriculum’ Primary Science Review No 17 April
Archer, J. & Lloyd, B. (1982) Sex and Gender Pelican
DowlingC. (1981) The Cinderella Complex: women's hidden fear of independence New York Summit Books
Whyte, J. (1982) Girls and Physics. A Report by the Joint Physics Education Committee The Royal Society/Institute of Physics. Dec
Walton, A. (1986) Women Scientists: Are they really Different? in Harding, J. (ed) Perspectives on Gender and Science, Falmer
Murphy, P. (1986) Differences between girls and boys in the APU science results, Primary Science Review No 2,
Whyte J. (1985) Gender Science and Technology SCDC publications, Longmans
Equinox, (1992) Channel 4 Television, Dec
Nuffield Secondary Science (1971) Theme 6 Movement Nuffield Foundation/Longmans
Doherty, M. (1987) Science education for girls: a case study, School Science Review 69(246)
SmailB. (1985) Girl friendly science: Avoiding Sex Bias in the Curriculum Longman for SCDC, York
Tall, S. (1990) ‘Changes as indicated by examination entries in England’ & Johnson & Bell ‘Gender differences in science option choices’ in Brown, C. A Girls, boys and technology’, School Science Review, 71 (257)
WhyteJ. (1983) Beyond the Wendy House: sex role stereotyping in primary schools, Longmans for SCDC, York
Goldstein, J. (1992) Toys for girls and boys, National Toy Council and Lego
Johnson, S and Murphy, P. (1986) Girls and Physics Reflections on Assessment of Performance Unit Findings Assessment of Performance Unit Occasional Paper No (DES and APU)
Brown, C.A. (1989) ‘Girls boys and technology, getting to the roots of the problem: a study of differential achievement in the early years’, School Science Review, 71 (255)
Claire, H. (1992) ‘Interaction between girls and boys: working with construction apparatus in first school classrooms’ Design and Technology Teaching Vol 24 No 2
Micro Electronics Support Unit [MESU] (1988) Press Release 18 March
Milner, A. (1988) reported in Wilce, H. Mixed doubles Times Educational Supplement 24.6
Pickford, T. (1992) ‘Girls and Science: the effect of some interventions.’ Primary Science Review 25 Dec
Black, P. & Harrison, G. (1985) In Place of Confusion: Technology and science in the school curriculum Nuffield Curriculum Trust & National Centre for Technology
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Brown, C. Bridging the gender gap in science and technology: How long will it take?. Int J Technol Des Educ 3, 65–73 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00454398
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00454398