Abstract
This study was designed to test how well a commercial intervention with a highly feminized role model (Barbie) worked to improve pre-adolescent girls’ interest and performance in computer science. Concurrently, this study examined how overtly feminist texts and images of real women would impact girls compared to the traditional highly feminized Barbie texts and images. Girls were randomly assigned to hear one of the four books in a 2 (pictures: Barbie illustrations or photos of real women) × 2 (text: original or feminist) design. Sixty-eight 6–13-year-old girls (M age = 9.48, SD = 1.41) were read a book, reported their interest in computer science, created an avatar for themselves, received coding training, and completed a coding assessment. It was predicted that girls who had seen a book with a highly feminized model and heard the original text would choose to spend more time on appearance-based skills (creating a personal avatar) over coding skills and thus would score lower on the coding assessment than girls who saw photos of real women and heard the feminist text. Results showed that the text manipulation, rather than the pictures, had the most influence on the girls’ behaviors: girls who heard the feminist text performed better on the coding task and were more likely to choose a coding activity over an avatar creation activity. The girls’ individual characteristics (gender attitudes and gendered avatar choices) showed significant associations with their hypothetical responses to sexist comments, coding performance, and choice of coding activity. Results underscore the importance of language in the internalization of gender stereotypes.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adam, H., & Harper, L. J. (2021). Gender equity in early childhood picture books: A cross-cultural study of frequently read picture books in early childhood classrooms in Australia and the United States. The Australian educational researcher, 50, 452–479. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13384-021-00494-0
Aladé, F., Lauricella, A., Kumar, Y., & Wartella, E. (2021). Who’s modeling STEM for kids? A character analysis of children’s STEM-focused television in the US. Journal of Children and Media, 15, 338–357. https://doi.org/10.1080/17482798.2020.1810087
Banchefsky, S., Westfall, J., Park, B., & Judd, C. M. (2016). But you don’t look like a scientist!: Women scientists with feminine appearance are deemed less likely to be scientists. Sex roles, 75, 95–109. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-016-0586-1
Betz, D. E., & Sekaquaptewa, D. (2012). My fair physicist? Feminine math and science role models demotivate young girls. Social psychological and personality science, 3(6), 738–746. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550612440735
Bond, B. J. (2016). Fairy godmothers > robots: The influence of televised gender stereotypes and counter-stereotypes on girls’ perceptions of STEM. Bulletin of science, technology & society, 36, 91–97. https://doi.org/10.1177/0270467616655951
Bond, B. J., & Calvert, S. L. (2014). A model and measure of U.S. parents’ perceptions of young children’s parasocial relationships. Journal of Children and Media, 8, 286–304. https://doi.org/10.1080/17482798.2014.890948
Boutte, G. S., Hopkins, R., & Waklatsi, T. (2008). Perspectives, voices and worldviews in frequently read children’s books. Early Education and Development, 19, 941–962. https://doi.org/10.1080/10409280802206643
Buck, G. A., Clark, V. L. P., Pelecky, D. L., Lu, Y., & Cerda-Lizarraga, P. (2008). Examining the cognitive processes used by adolescent girls and women scientists in identifying science role models: A feminist approach. Science education, 92(4), 688–707. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20257
Bussey, K., & Bandura, A. (1999). Social cognitive theory of gender development and differentiation. Psychological review, 106, 676–713. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.106.4.676
Caldwell, E., & Wilbraham, S. (2018). Hairdressing in space: Depiction of gender in science books for children. Journal of Science & Popular Culture, 1, 101–118. https://doi.org/10.1386/jspc.1.2.101_1
Carrell, S. E., Page, M. E., & West, J. E. (2010). Sex and science: How professor gender perpetuates the gender gap. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 125(3), 1101–1144. https://doi.org/10.1162/qjec.2010.125.3.1101
Cheryan, S., Siy, J. O., Vichayapai, M., Drury, B. J., & Kim, S. (2011). Do female and male role models who embody STEM stereotypes hinder women’s anticipated success in STEM? Social psychological and personality science, 2(6), 656–664. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550611405218
Cohen, S. M., Hazari, Z., Mahadeo, J., Sonnert, G., & Sadler, P. M. (2021). Examining the effect of early STEM experiences as a form of STEM capital and identity capital on STEM identity: A gender study. Science education, 105(6), 1126–1150. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21670
Coyle, E. F., & Liben, L. S. (2016). Affecting girls’ activity and job interests through play: The moderating roles of personal gender salience and game characteristics. Child development, 87, 414–428. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12463
Dasgupta, N., & Asgari, S. (2004). Seeing is believing: Exposure to counterstereotypic women leaders and its effect on the malleability of automatic gender stereotyping. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 40(5), 642–658. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2004.02.003
Dunn, J. A., & McLaughlin, B. (2019). Counter-stereotyped protagonists and stereotyped supporting casts: Identification with Black characters and symbolic racism. Communication research reports, 36, 309–319. https://doi.org/10.1080/08824096.2019.1660870
Fairlie, R. W., Hoffmann, F., & Oreopoulos, P. (2014). A community college instructor like me: Race and ethnicity interactions in the classroom. American economic review, 104, 2567–2591. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.104.8.2567
Fiesler, C. (2014). Barbie, Remixed: I (really!) can be a computer engineer. Casey Fiesler. https://caseyfiesler.com/2014/11/18/barbie-remixed-i-really-can-be-a-computer-engineer/
Frantom, C. G., Green, K. E., & Hoffman, E. R. (2002). Measure development: The children’s attitudes toward technology scale (CATS). Journal of Educational Computing Research, 26(3), 249–263. https://doi.org/10.2190/DWAF-8LEQ-74TN-BL37
Fritz, M. S., & MacKinnon, D. P. (2007). Required sample size to detect the mediated effect. Psychological science, 18(3), 233–239. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01882.x
Goudreau, J. (2012). Serial career changer Barbie now running for president. Forbes https://www.forbes.com/sites/jennagoudreau/2012/04/04/barbie-is-running-for-president/
Guerrero, S., Enesco, L., Lago, O., & Rodriguez, P. (2010). Preschool children’s understanding of racial cues in drawings and photographs. Cognitive development, 25, 79–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogdev.2009.07.001
Heine, P., Inkster, C., Kazemek, F., Williams, S., Raschke, S., & Stevens, D. (1999). Talking about books: Strong female characters in recent children’s literature. Language arts, 76, 427–434.
Herrmann, S. D., Adelman, R. M., Bodford, J. E., Graudejus, O., Morris, A. O., & Kwan, V. S. Y. (2016). The effects of a female role model on academic performance and persistence of women in STEM courses. Basic and applied psychology, 38, 258–268. https://doi.org/10.1080/01973533.2016.1209757
Howley, A., Pendarvis, E., & Gholson, M. (2005). How talented students in a rural school district experience school mathematics. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 29(2), 123–160. https://doi.org/10.1177/016235320502900202
Howley, C. W. (2006). Remote possibilities: Rural children’s educational aspirations. Peabody Journal of Education, 81(2), 62–80. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327930pje8102_4
Jack, F., Martyn, E., & Zajac, R. (2015). Getting the picture: Effects of sketch plans and children’s adolescents’ and adults’ eyewitness recall. Applied cognitive psychology, 29, 723–734. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.3156
Jacobs, J. E., Finken, L. L., Griffin, N. L., & Wright, J. D. (1998). The career plans of science-talented rural adolescent girls. American Educational Research Journal, 35(4), 681–704. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312035004681
Johnson, P. J., & Aboud, F. E. (2017). Evaluation of an intervention using cross-race friend storybooks to reduce prejudice among majority race young children. Early childhood research quarterly, 40, 110–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2017.02.003
Jones, T. R., & Burrell, S. (2022). Present in class yet absent in science: The individual and societal impact of inequitable science instruction and challenge to improve science instruction. Science education, 106(5), 1032–1053. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21728
Kirkpatrick-Johnson, M., Elder, G. H., & Stern, M. (2005). Attachments to family and community and the young adult transition of rural youth. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 15, 99–125. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-7795.2005.00088.x
Kokesh, J., & Sternadori, M. (2015). The good, the bad, and the ugly: A qualitative study of how young adult fiction affects identity construction. Atlantic Journal of Communication, 23, 139–158. https://doi.org/10.1080/15456870.2015.1013104
Kuther, T. L., & McDonald, E. (2004). Early adolescents’ experiences with, and views of Barbie. Adolescence, 39, 39–51.
Lamb, L. M., Bigler, R. S., Liben, L. S., & Green, V. A. (2009). Teaching children to confront peers’ sexist remarks: Implications for theories of gender development and educational practice. Sex roles, 61(5–6), 361–382. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-009-9634-4
Lee, M., & Lee, H. (2021). Social media photo activity, internalization, appearance comparison, and body satisfaction: The role of photo-editing behavior. Computers in human behavior, 114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106579
Liben, L. S., & Bigler, R. S. (2002). The developmental course of gender differentiation: Conceptualizing, measuring, and evaluating constructs and pathways. Monographs of the society for research in child development, 67(2). https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-5834.t01-1-00187
MacDonald, P. M., & Kirkpatrick, S. W. (1996). Schematic drawings of facial expressions for emotion recognition and interpretation by pre-school aged children. Genetic, social and general psychology monographs, 122, 375–389.
Martinez, A. & Christnact, C. (2021). Women are nearly half of U.S. workforce but only 27% of STEM workers. Retrieved from: https://www.census.gov/library/stories/2021/01/women-making-gains-in-stem-occupations-but-still-underrepresented.html
Master, A., Meltzoff, A. N., & Cheryan, S. (2022). Gender stereotypes about interests start early and cause gender disparities in computer science and engineering. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 118. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2100030118
Mattel. (2010). Barbie: I can be a computer engineer.
Mattel. (2022). Barbie: You Can Be Anything. http://www.barbie.com/en-gb/youcanbeanything/
McKenney, S. J., & Bigler, R. S. (2014). Internalized sexualization and its relation to sexualized appearance, body surveillance, and body shame among early adolescent girls. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 36(2), 171–197. https://doi.org/10.1177/0272431614556889
Nhundu, T. J. (2007). Mitigating gender-typed occupational preferences of Zimbabwean primary school children: The use of biographical sketches and portrayals of female role models. Sex roles, 56(9–10), 639–649. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-007-9204-6
National Science Foundation (2023). Supporting women and girls in STEM. Retrieved from: https://new.nsf.gov/funding/initiatives/broadening-participation/supporting-women-girls-stem
Olsson, M., & Martiny, S. E. (2018). Does exposure to counterstereotypical role models influence girls’ and women’s gender stereotypes and career choices? A review of social psychological research. Frontiers in psychology, 9, 2264. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02264
Pahlke, E. P., Bigler, R. S., & Martin, C. L. (2014). Can fostering children’s ability to challenge sexism improve critical analysis, internalization, egalitarian peer relationships? Journal of Social Issues, 70, 115–133. https://doi.org/10.1111/josi.12050
Plant, E. A., Baylor, A. L., Doerr, C. E., & Rosenberg-Kima, R. B. (2009). Changing middle-school students’ attitudes and performance regarding engineering with computer-based social models. Computers & education, 53(2), 209–215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2009.01.013
Raynor, S. (2009). My first Black Barbie: Transforming the image. Cultural studies/ critical methodologies, 9, 179–185. https://doi.org/10.1177/15327086083266
Rogers, A. A., Boyack, M., Cook, R. E., & Allen, E. (2021). School connectedness and STEM orientation in adolescent girls: The role of perceived gender discrimination and implicit gender-science stereotypes. Sex roles, 85, 405–421. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-021-01224-7
Rosenberg-Kima, R. B., Baylor, A. L., Plant, E. A., & Doerr, C. E. (2008). Interface agents as social models for female students: The effects of agent visual presence and appearance on female students’ attitudes and beliefs. Computers in human behavior, 24(6), 2741–2756. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2008.03.017
Saw, G. K., & Agger, C. A. (2021). STEM pathways of rural and small-town students: Opportunities to learn, aspirations, preparation, and college enrollment. Educational researcher, 50(9), 595–606. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X211027528
Scratch Foundation (2021). Scratch—Imagine, program, share. https://scratch.mit.edu/
Sherman, A. M., & Zurbriggen, E. L. (2014). “Boys can be anything”: Effect of Barbie play on girls’ career cognitions. Sex roles, 70(5–6), 195–208. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-014-0347-y
Stout, J. G., Dasgupta, N., Hunsinger, M., & McManus, M. A. (2011). STEMing the tide: Using ingroup experts to inoculate women’s self-concept in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM). Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100, 255–270. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021385
Tellhed, U., Björklund, F., Strand, K. K., & Schöttelndreier, K. (2023). “Programming is not that hard!” When a science center visit increases young women’s programming ability beliefs. Journal for STEM Education Research, 6, 252–274. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41979-023-00094-w
Teran, L., Yan, K., & Aubrey, S. (2019). “But first let me take a selfie”: U.S. adolescent girls’ selfie activities, self-objectification, imaginary audience beliefs and appearance concerns. Journal of children and media, 14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106579
U.S. Census Bureau. (2021). QuickFacts: Rockbridge County, Virginia. Retrieved from https://www.census.gov/quickfacts/rockbridgecountyvirginia
Wang, X. (2013). Why students choose STEM majors: Motivation, high school learning, and postsecondary context of support. American Educational Research Journal, 50, 1081–1121. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831213488622
Wettersten, K. B., Guilmino, A., Herrick, C. G., Hunter, P. J., Kim, G. Y., Jagow, D., Beecher, T., Faul, K., Baker, A. A., Rudolph, S. E., Ellenbecker, K., & McCormick, J. (2005). Predicting educational and vocational attitudes among rural high school students. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 52, 658–663. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.52.4.658
Women in engineering. (2021). https://swe.org/research/2021/women-in-engineering-fast-facts/
Xiamen Black Mirror Corporation. (2019). Myidol [Mobile app]. Apple App Store. https://apps.apple.com/us/app/myidol-3d-avatar-creator/id867964769?platform=ipad
Zuniga, K., Olson, J. K., & Winter, M. (2005). Science education for rural Latino/a students: Course placement and success in science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42(4), 376–402. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20064
Acknowledgements
We would like to thank all of the participants who took part in this research.
Funding
The present research was supported in part by the Lenfest Summer Research Grant awarded to Megan Fulcher.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Each of the authors has approved this manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing Interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
This manuscript or any portion of it has not been published and is not under review at any other journal.
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Fulcher, M., Schroeder, K. & Rabung, J. Barbie, I Can(’t) be a Computer Engineer: the Impact of Barbie Text and Images on Girls’ Computing Performance. Journal for STEM Educ Res (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41979-023-00110-z
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41979-023-00110-z