Skip to main content
Log in

Simulation and optimization of tool-life in manufacturing centers

  • Published:
Journal of Intelligent and Robotic Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper presents the development of an optimization and a computer-simulation model to evaluate the process plans of a manufacturing center by analyzing the effect of tool failure on system performance. The GPSS/PC simulation program that is used in this study has been built with variables, functions and matrices so that many experiments could be conducted with the model. Sensitivity analysis is presented and the developed model has proven to be useful in determining optimum sequencing of parts for various operating policies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. SuhN.P., New theories of wear and their implications for tool life, Wear 62, 1–20 (1980).

    Google Scholar 

  2. BillatosS.B., et al., A statistical wear-model for certain tool materials with applications to machining, Int. J. Wear 112, 257–71 (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  3. NagasakaK. and HashimotoF., The establishment of tool life equation considering the amount of tool wear, J. Wear 81, 21–31 (1982).

    Google Scholar 

  4. DeVorR.E., AndersonD.L., and ZdeblickW.J., Tool life variations and its influence on the development of tool-life models, ASME Trans. Series B 99, 578 (1977).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Hitomi, K., Nakamura, N., and Inove, S., Reliability analysis of cutting tools, ASME Paper No. 78-WA/PROD-9 (1978).

  6. VysokovskiiE.S., Reliability of cutting tools used on semi-automatic lathes, Russian Eng. J. 46, (6), 46–40 (1966).

    Google Scholar 

  7. VysokovskiiE.S., Reliability of cutting tools in automated production, Russian Eng. J. 50(3), 63–67 (1970).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Billatos, S.B. and Kendall, L.A., An optimal tool changing model for a machining center, ASME-WAM, PED 23, DSC 4, (1986) pp. 245–262.

  9. GertsbakhI.B. and KordonskyKh.B., Models of Failure, Springer-Verlag, New York (1969).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Sheikh, A.K. and Ahmed, M., Estimation of the parameters of the Bernestein population from complete and censored samples, pp. 225–227.

  11. SchriberT.J., Simulation Using GPSS, Wiley, New York (1974).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Schriber, T.J., The use of GPSS/H in modeling typical FMS, Proc. First ORSA/TIMS Special Conf. in FMS, 1984.

  13. CarrieA.S. and BereraD.T.S., Work scheduling in FMS under tool availability constrains, Int. J. Production Res. 24, 1299–1308 (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  14. CampbellH.G., RichardA.D., and MiltonL.S., A heuristic algorithm for the n job, m machine sequencing problem, Management Science 16, 630–637 (1970).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Brooks, G.H. and Charlies, R.W., An algorithm for finding optimal or near optimal solutions for the production scheduling problems, J. Ind. Eng. 16 No. 1 (1965).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Stinson, J.P. and Arthur, W.S., A heuristic programming procedure for sequencing the static flow-shop, Int. J. Production Res. 20 No. 6 (1982).

    Google Scholar 

  17. King, J.R. and Spachir, A.S., Heuristics for flow-shop scheduling, Int. J. Production Res. 18 No. 3 (1980).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Abdou, G.H., Billatos, S.B. Simulation and optimization of tool-life in manufacturing centers. J Intell Robot Syst 2, 73–89 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00450557

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00450557

Key words

Navigation