Skip to main content
Log in

Factors affecting growth and urease production by Trichophyton spp.

  • Published:
Mycopathologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Among Trichophyton spp. examined for urease production, T. rubrum was negative, whereas T. mentagrophytes appeared to be the most active species. Urease was not detected in cell-free culture fluids of the tested fungi. The endocellular urease of the test fungi was essentially constitutive. Moreover, addition of urea to the growth medium of these organisms markedly inhibited their mycelial biomass and ureolytic yield. Environmental factors showed variable effects on the test fungi and there was no correlation between mycelial growth and urease activity of these fungi.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Al-Doory Y. Laboratory Medical Mycology. London: Lea & Febiger Philadelphia Kimpton Publishers, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Jeffries CD, Reiss E, Ajello L. Analytical isoelectric focusing of secreted dermatophyte proteins applied to taxonomic differentiation of Microsporum and Trichophyton species (preliminary studies). J Medical and Vet Mycol. 1984; 122: 369–379.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Abdel-Rahman TMA, Salama A, Aly MIA, El-Selhdar MAH. Preparation and kinetics of urease in A. fumigatus and F. nivale. Egypt J Microb 1992; 27: 291–305.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Burack AM, Knight SG. Observations on submerged growth and deamination of amino acids by dermatophytes. J Invest Derm 1958; 30: 197.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Littman M. An improved method for detection of urea hydrolysis by fungi. J Infect Dis 1957; 101: 51.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Rosenthal SA, Sokolsky H. Enzymatic studies with pathogenic fungi. Dermatol Internal 1965; 4: 72.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Philpot CM. The differentiation of Trichophyton mentagrophytes from Trichophyton rubrum by a simple urease test. Sabouraudia 1967; 5: 189.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Philpot CM. The use of nutritional test for the differentiation of dermatophytes. Sabouraudia 1977; 15: 141.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Sequeira H, Cabrita J, Vroey CD, Wuptack-Raes C. Contribution to our knowledge of Trichophyton megninii. J Medical and Vet Mycol 1991; 29: 417–418.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Mahmoud A-LE. Some physiological and biochemical studies on fungi isolated from skin of mammals. Ph.D. Thesis. Botany Dept., Fac. of Sci., Assiut Univ., Assiut, Egypt, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Mahmoud A-LE. Dermatophytes and other associated fungi isolated from ringworm lesions of camels. Folia Microbiol 1993a; 38: 505–508.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Seeliger HPR. Use of a urease test for the screening and identification of cryptococci. J Bact 1956; 72: 127–131.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Sanyal AK, Banerjee AB. Urease activity in Trichophyton mentagrophytes. Folia Microbiol 1983; 28: 82–86.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Voegel A. Quantitative Inorganic Analysis ELBS, Longman, London. 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Ball C, Koening H, Kremer M. Etude de l'hydrolyse de l'uree par les champignons filamenteux en milieu uree'-indole. Bulletin de la Societe Francaise de Mycologie Me'dicate 1988; 117: 341–344.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Ismail MA, Omar SA. Factors affecting ureolytic activities of a highly ureolytic fungus Penicillium waksmanii isolated from sewage sludge. Folia microbiol 1994; 39: 441–444.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Moharram AM, Abdel-Hafez SII, Ismail MA. Amylolytic activities of fungi isolated from different sources in Kharga Oasis, Egypt. The Second Regional Mycological Conference RMC, Cairo, Egypt, 1992; 12: 7–10.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Mahmoud A-LE. Different factors affecting growth and amylase production by fungi inhabiting poultry feeds. J Basic Microbiol 1993b; 33: 187–192.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Eng H, Roberston JA, Stemke GW. Properties of urease from Ureaplasma urealyticum. Kinetics, molecular weight and demonstration of multiple enzyme isoelectric point forms. Can J Microb 1986; 32: 487.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Juillard D, Desmazeaud MJ, Spinnler HE. Demonstration of urease activity of Streptococcus thermophile. Can J Microb 1988; 34: 818.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Gasser JKR. Urea as a fertilizer. Soils and Fertilisers 1964; 27: 175–180.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Tomlinson TE. Urea agronomic applications. Proceedings of the Fertiliser Society 1970; 113: 1–76.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Engelstad OP, Hauck RD. Urea-will it become the most popular nitrogen carrier? Crops and Soils 1974; 26: 11–14.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mahmoud, A.L.E., El-Shanawany, A.A. & Omar, S.A. Factors affecting growth and urease production by Trichophyton spp.. Mycopathologia 135, 109–113 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00436460

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00436460

Key words

Navigation