Skip to main content
Log in

A multi-stage model of choice incorporating reference prices

  • Published:
Marketing Letters Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Most empirical choice models specify simple structures with marketing mix and household descriptors as independent variables and some measure of brand choice as the dependent variable. However, these models are not consistent with buyer behavior models that posit some type of multi-stage choice process with consumers moving through various stages such as perceptions and preferences. In this paper, a multi-stage model incorporating preference measures and reference prices is specified and estimated using consumer scanner panel data featuring household-level advertising exposure measures. Preference is estimated using scaling procedures recently shown to be effective with choice data. The results show empirical support for the model as preferences and reference prices impact household choice shares.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Byukkurt, B.Kemal. “Integration of Serially Sampled Information: Modelling and Some Findings.” Journal of Consumer Research 13 (December 1986), 357–373.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eskin, Gerald, J. “Tracking Advertising and Promotion Performance with Single-Source Data.” Journal of Advertising Research 25 (February–March 1985), 31–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farley, John U., and L. WinstonRing. “An Empirical Test of the Howard-Sheth Model of Buyer Behavior.” Journal of Marketing Research 7 (November 1970), 427–438.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farley, John U., John A.Howard, and Donald R.Lehmann. “A ‘Working’ System Model of Car Buyer Behavior.” Management Science 23 (November 1976), 235–247.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gensch, Dennis H. “A Two-Stage Disaggregate Attribute Choice Model.” Marketing Science 6 (Summer 1987), 223–239.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hauser, John R., and Patricia, Simmie. “Profit Maximizing Perceptual Positions: An Integrated Theory for the Selection of Product Features and Prices.” Management Science 27 (January 1981), 33–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman, Donna L., and George R.Franke. “Correspondence Analysis: Graphical Representation of Categorical Data in Marketing Research.” Journal of Marketing Research 23 (August 1986), 213–227.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holbrook, Morris B. “Integrating Compositional and Decompositional Analyses to Represent the Intervening Role of Perceptions in Evaluative Judgments.” Journal of Marketing Resarch 18 (February 1981), 13–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holbrook, Morris B., William L.Moore, and Russell S.Winer. “Constructing Joint Spaces from Pick-Any Data: A New Tool for Consumer Analysis.” Journal of Consumer Research 9 (June 1982), 99–105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howard, John A., and Jagdish N.Sheth. The Theory of Buyer Behavior. New York: Wiley, 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krishnamurthi, Lakshman, and S. P.Raj. “A Model of Brand Choice and Purchase Quantity Price Sensitivities.” Marketing Science 7 (Winter 1988), 1–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lavidge, Robert J., and Gary A.Steiner. “A Model for Predictive Measurements of Advertising Effectiveness.” Journal of Marketing 25 (October 1961), 59–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rao, Vithala R., and Darius JalSabavala. “Inference of Hierarchical Choice Processes from Panel Data.” Journal of Consumer Research 8 (June 1981), 85–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sawyer, Alan, and PeterDickson. “Psychological Perspectives on Consumer Response to Sales Promotion.” In Research on Sales Promotion: Collected Papers, ed. K.Jocz. Cambridge, MA: Marketing Science Institute, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tellis, Gerard J. “Advertising Exposure, Loyalty and Brand Purchase: A Two-Stage Model of Choice.” Journal of Marketing Research 15 (May 1988), 134–144.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tversky, Amos, and Shmuel, Sattath. “Preference Trees.” Psychological Review 86 (1979), 542–573.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tybout, Alice M., and John R.Hauser. “A Marketing Audit Using a Conceptual Model of Consumer Behavior: Application and Evaluation.” Journal of Marketing 45 (Summer 1981), 82–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winer, Russell S. “A Reference Price Model of Demand for Frequently-Purchased Products.” Journal of Consumer Research 13 (September 1986), 250–256.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Winer, R.S. A multi-stage model of choice incorporating reference prices. Market Lett 1, 27–36 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00436146

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00436146

Keywords

Navigation