Skip to main content
Log in

Dynamic simulation and neural network compliance control of an intelligent forging center

  • Published:
Journal of Intelligent and Robotic Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Automation of forging processes is important for both safety and efficiency in today's advanced manufacturing operations. This work supports the development of an Intelligent Open Die Forging System which will integrate state-of-the-art modelling techniques, automatic die selection and sequencing, full system dynamic simulation, automatic machine programming and coordination, and sensor-based process control to enable the production of more general and complex workpiece geometries than are achievable using current forging methods. Effective automation of this open die forging system requires the coordination and control of the major system components: press, robot, and furnace. In particular, forces exerted on the robot through its manipulation of the workpiece during forging must be minimized to avoid damage to the manipulator mechanism. In this paper, the application of neural networks for compliance control of the forging robot to minimize these forces is investigated. Effectiveness of the neural network-based compliance control module is evaluated through a full dynamic system simulation, which will later form a central part of the complete Intelligent Forging System. Dynamic simulation of the robot is achieved using an efficient O(N) recursive algorithm, while material flow of the workpiece is modeled with a finite element approach. Simulation and timing results for the complete processing system for a specific open die forging example are presented.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ang, C. S.: Implementation of the virtual environment force control concept an industrial robot, MS Thesis, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Penn State University, 1994.

  2. Appleton, E., Higginbotham, W. B. and Law, D.: Open die forging with an industrial robot, The Industrial Robot (December 1979), 191–194.

  3. Appleton, E.: Open-die forging operations by industrial robot, Robotic Technology 15 (1983), 160–168.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Asada, H.: Teaching and learning of compliance using neural nets: Representation and generation of nonlinear compliance, in Proc. 1990 IEEE Int. Conf. Robotics and Automation, 1990, pp. 1237–1244.

  5. Brandl, H., Johanni, R. and Otter, M.: A very efficient algorithm for the simulation of robots and similar multibody systems without inversion of the mass matrix, Proc. IFAC/IFIP/IMACS Int. Symp. Theory of Robots, 1986.

  6. Cha, D. H.: Compliance control of telerobot systems using a recurrent neural network, in Proc. Japan-USA Symp. Flexible Automation, Part 1, 1992, pp. 271–274.

  7. Connoly, T. H.: Neural network hybrid position/force control, in Proc. 1993 Int. Conf. Intelligent Robots and Systems, 1993, pp. 240–244.

  8. Featherstone, R.: Robot Dynamics Algorithms, Kluwer, Boston, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  9. FIA, Open Die Forging Manual, 3rd edn, Forging Industry Association, Cleveland, OH, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Funahashi, K. I.: On the approximate realization of continuous mappings by neural networks, Neural Networks 2 (1989), 183–192.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Han, C. S., Gandhi, R. V. and Srinivasan, R.: Optimum design of forging die shapes using nonlinear finite element analysis, AIAA J. 31(4) (1993), 774–781.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Her, M. G.: Automated robotic deburring of parts using compliance control, ASME J. Dynamic Systems, Measurement, and Control 113(1) (1991), 60–66.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Kazerooni, H.: Compliance control and stability analysis of cooperating robot manipulators, Robotica 7(3) (1989), 191–198.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Kobayashi, S., Oh, S. and Altan, T.: Metal Forming and the Finite Element Method, Oxford University Press, New York, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Kwan, C. M.: Robust force/motion control of constrained robots using neural networks, in Proc. IEEE Conf. Decision and Control, Vol. 2, 1994, pp. 1862–1867.

  16. Lee, C. H. and Kobayashi, S.: New solution to rigid plastic deformation problems using a matrix method, ASME Trans. J. Engrg. Industry 95 (1973), 865–873.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Lilly, K. W.: Efficient Dynamic Simulation of Robotic Mechanisms, Kluwer, Boston, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Lilly K. W. and Jablokow A. G.: Intelligent open die forging, Int. J. Industrial Engrg. 2(3) (1995).

  19. Lilly, K. W. and Melligeri, A. S.: Efficient dynamic simulation of an integrated robot/forge near net-shape processing center, in R. P.Judd and N. A.Kheir (eds), Intelligent Manufacturing Systems, Pergamon, New York, 1992, pp. 347–351.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Lilly, K. W. and Orin, D. E.: Efficient dynamic simulation of a single closed-chain manipulator, in Proc. 1991 IEEE Int. Conf. Robotics and Automation, Vol. 1, 1991, pp. 210–215.

  21. Maekawa, A.: Compliance control of an articulted manipulator, JSME Int. J. Ser. C: Dynamics, Control, Robotics, Design and Manufacturing 37(1) (1994), 155–161.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Melligeri, A. S. and Lilly, K. W.: Application of neural networks in compliance control of an integrated robot/forge processing center, in R.Sodhi (ed.), Advances in Manufacturing Systems: Design, Modeling and Analysis, Elsevier, New York, 1993, pp. 445–450.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Orin, D. E. and McGhee, R. B.: Dynamic computer simulation of robotic mechanisms, Int. J. Robotics Res. 7(5) (1981), 32–47.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Raibert, M. and Craig, J.: Hybrid position/force control of manipulators, ASME J. Dynamic Systems, Measurement, and Control 102(2) (1981), 126–133.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Roberson, R. E. and Schwertassek, R. F., Introduction to the Dynamics of Multibody Systems, Springer, Berlin, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Rodiguez, G., Jain, A. and Kreutz-Delgado, K.: A spatial operator algebra for manipulator modeling and control, Int. J. Robotics Res. 10 (1991), 371–381.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Rumelhart, D. E. and McClelland, J. L.: Parallel Distributed Processing, MIT Press, 1986.

  28. Venkataraman, S. T., Gulati, S., Barhen, J. and Toomarian, N.: Parameter learning and compliance control using neural networks, in G. A.Bekey and K. Y.Goldberg (eds), Neural Networks in Robotics, Kluwer, Boston, 1993, pp. 193–216.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Vitscheff, V.: A programmable manipulator for closed die forging, Proc. 9th Int. Drop Forging Convention, Kyoto, Japan, 1977.

  30. Waibel, B. J.: Theory and experiments on the stability of robot compliance control, IEEE Trans. Robotics and Automation 7(1) (1991), 95–104.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Walker, M. W. and Orin, D. E.: Efficient dynamic computer simulation of robotic mechanisms, ASME J. Dynamic Systems, Measurement, and Control 104 (1982), 205–211.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Wasserman, P. D., Neural Computing, Van Nostrand/Reinhold, New York, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Westmeyer, W. B.: Modernization speeds open die operation, Forging, Winter Issue (1991), 30–34.

  34. Wright, J. R.: Investing in Excellence, Forging, Winter Issue (1991), 16–19.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lilly, K.W., Melligeri, A.S. Dynamic simulation and neural network compliance control of an intelligent forging center. J Intell Robot Syst 17, 81–99 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00435717

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00435717

Key words

Navigation