Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Does the anchorage form and depth influence the pull-out strength of screws from bone cement?

An experimental study

  • Clinical and Expertmental Forum
  • Published:
Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The pull-out strengths of cortical screws inserted into soft, unpolymerised Refobacin Palacos bone cement (procedure S) and into hardened polymerised cement into which a hole had been drilled and tapped (procedure P) were compared. Cortical screws 58 mm in length, outer diameter 4.5 mm and inner diameter 2.95 mm were used. Screws were inserted into cement cylinders at 5 mm incremental depths between 10 and 30 mm. At a screw depth of less than 25 mm, the screws pulled out, and at a depth of greater than 25 mm, the screws broke in both procedures. There was no statistically significant difference in pull-out strength leading to burst or break between the two procedures for screws inserted to comparable depths, but there was a statistically significant difference regarding the screwing depth regardless of the procedure of screw insertion chosen. The average material stability (σ) of the cortical screws used was calculated to be 1191 N/mm2, and the elasticity limit was 5137 N. This study demonstrated that the material stability and not the depth of screw insertion was the limiting parameter in screw anchorage in bone cement while static testing. To avoid screw breakage due to fatigue during continuous alternate loading, the screws should not be loaded above this value.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Anderson JT, Erickson JM, Thompson RC, Chao EY (1978) Pathologic femoral shaft fractures comparing fixation techniques using cement. Clin Orthop 131:273–278

    Google Scholar 

  2. Cameron HU, Jacob R, McNab I, Pilliar RM (1975) Use of polymethylmethacrylate to enhance screw fixation in bone. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 58:655–656

    Google Scholar 

  3. Frandsen PA, Christoffersen H, Madsen T (1984) Holding power of different screws in the femoral head: a study in human cadaver hips. Acta Orthop Scand 55:349–351

    Google Scholar 

  4. Friedl W, Ruf W Mischkowsky T (1986) Die Doppelplattenverbundosteosynthese bei subtrochantären pathologischen Frakturen. Chirurg 57:713–718

    Google Scholar 

  5. Habermann ET, Sachs R, Stern RE, Hirsh DM, Anderson WJ (1982) The pathology and treatment of metastatic diseases of the femur. Clin Orthop 169:70–82

    Google Scholar 

  6. Holz U (1985) Verbundosteosynthese bei Spontanfrakturen am Femur. Akt Traumatol 15:100–103

    Google Scholar 

  7. Iversen BF, Sturup J, Lyndrup P, Jensen NC, Therkilden MH (1988) Screw fixation in the femoral head: Auszug tests in cadavers. Acta Orthop Scand 59:655–657

    Google Scholar 

  8. Kleeman BC, Takeuchi T, Gerhart TN, Hayes WC (1992) Holding power and reinforcement of cancellous screws in human bone. Clin Orthop 284:260–266

    Google Scholar 

  9. Koryanyi E, Bowman CE, Knecht CD, Janssen M (1970) Holding power of orthopedic screws in bone. Clin Orthop 72:283–285

    Google Scholar 

  10. Leggon RE, Lindsey RW, Panjabi MM (1988) Strength reduction and the effects of treatment of long bones with diaphyseal defects involving 50% of the cortex. J Orthop Res 6:540–546

    Google Scholar 

  11. Lintner P, Burri C, Claes L, Plank E, Ruter A (1978) Stabilitatsverhalten und Implantatbeanspruchung von Platten- und Verbundosteosynthesen des Femurschaftes. Akt Traumatol 8:435–440

    Google Scholar 

  12. Motzkin NE, Chao EYS, An K-N, Wikenheiser MA, Lewallen DG (1994) Pull-out strength of screws from polymethylmethacrylate cement. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 76:320–323

    Google Scholar 

  13. Oest O (1970) Verbundosteosynthesen in mechanischer und funktioneller Sicht. In: Proceedings of the Fifty-Seventh Annual Meeting of the German Society of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Munich, Germany, pp 367–373

  14. Scheuba G (1966) Die Osteosynthese mit dem Kunstharz Palacos. Chirurg 37:506–508

    Google Scholar 

  15. Scheuermann H, Ege W (1987) Aufbau und Zusammensetzung handelsüblicher Knochenzemente In: Willert HG, Buchhorn G (eds) Knochenzement. Akt Probl Chir Orthop 31:17–20

  16. Sim FH, Daugherty TW, Ivins JC (1974) The use of methylmethacrylate in fixation of pathological fractures. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 56:40–48

    Google Scholar 

  17. Soshi S, Shiba R, Kondo H, Murota K (1991) An experimental study on transpedicular screw fixation in relation to osteoporosis of the lumbar spine. Spine 16:1335–1341

    Google Scholar 

  18. Strube HD, Ritter G (1985) Die Verbundosteosynthese. Unfallchirurg 88:53–62

    Google Scholar 

  19. Szyszkowitz R (1972) Pathologische distale Femurfraktur. Akt Traumatol 2:91–96

    Google Scholar 

  20. Wittenberg RH, Lee KS, Shea M, White A, Hayes WC (1993) Effect of screw diameter, insertion technique, and bone cement augmentation of pedicular screw fixation strength. Clin Orthop 296:278–287

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Heller, K.D., Zilkens, K.W., Hammer, J. et al. Does the anchorage form and depth influence the pull-out strength of screws from bone cement?. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 116, 88–91 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00434108

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00434108

Keywords

Navigation