Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Is religious education compatible with science education?

  • Published:
Science & Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper tackles a highly controversial issue: the problem of the compatibility of science and religion, and its bearing on science and religious education respectively. We challenge the popular view that science and religion are compatible or even complementary. In order to do so, we give a brief characterization of our conceptions of science and religion. Conspicuous differences at the doctrinal, metaphysical, methodological and attitudinal level are noted. Regarding these aspects, closer examination reveals that science and religion are not only different but in fact incompatible. Some consequences of our analysis for education as well as for education policy are explored. We submit that a religious education, particularly at an early age, is an obstacle to the development of a scientific mentality. For this and other reasons, religious education should be kept away from public schools and universities. Instead of promoting a religious world view, we should teach our children what science knows about religion, i.e., how science explains the existence of religion in historical, biological, psychological and sociological terms.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Albert, H.: 1981, Traktat über kritische Vernunft, J.C.B. Mohr (Paul Siebeck), Tübingen (English translation (1985)), Treatise on Critical Reason, Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barker, D.: 1990, Maybe Yes, Maybe No. A Guide for Young Skeptics, Prometheus Books, Buffalo, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartley, W.W.: 1984, The Retreat to Commitment, Open Court Publishing Company, La Salle, Illinois.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bindra, D.: 1976, A Theory of Intelligent Behavior, John Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blitz, D.: 1992, Emergent Evolution. Qualitative Novelty and the Levels of Reality, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brockman, C.: 1989, What About Gods?, Prometheus Books, Buffalo, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buggle, F.: 1992, Denn sie wissen nicht was sie glauben, Rowohlt, Reinbek.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bunge, M.: 1967, Foundations of Physics, Springer Verlag, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bunge, M.: 1977, The Furniture of the World: Ontology I, D. Reidel, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bunge, M.: 1979a, A World of Systems: Ontology II, D. Reidel, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bunge, M.: 1979b, Causality in Modern Science, 3rd ed., Dover, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bunge, M.: 1980, The Mind-Body Problem, Pergamon Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bunge, M.: 1981, Scientific Materialism, D. Reidel, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bunge, M.: 1983a, Exploring the World: Epistemology & Methodology I, D. Reidel, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bunge, M.: 1983b, Understanding the World: Epistemology & Methodology II, D. Reidel, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bunge, M.: 1988, ‘Ideology and Science’, in G.L.Eberlein & P.H.Berghel (eds.), Theory and Decision. Essays in Honor of Werner Leinfellner, D. Reidel, Dordrecht. pp. 79–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bunge, M.: 1989a, Ethics—The Good and the Right, D. Reidel, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bunge, M.: 1989b, ‘The Popular Perception of Science in North America’, Transactions of the Royal Society of Canada, Series V, 4, 269–280.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burtt, E.A.: 1932, The Metaphysical Foundations of Modern Physical Science, Routledge & Kegan Paul, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, B.: 1994, ‘How Religion Impedes Moral Development’, Free Inquiry 14(3), 23–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clements, T.S.: 1990, Science vs. Religion, Prometheus Books, Buffalo, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clouse, B.: 1985, ‘Moral Reasoning and Christian Faith’, Journal of Psychology and Theology 12, 190–198.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawkins, R.: 1993, ‘Viruses of the Mind’, Free Inquiry 13(3), 34–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dugan, D. & Daar, J.: 1994, ‘Are Rudolf Steiner's Waldorf Schools ‘Non-Sectarian?’, Free Inquiry 14(2), 44–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Durkheim, E.: 1972, Selected Writings, edited by A.Giddens, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eccles, J.C.: 1980, The Human Psyche, Springer International, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, P. (ed.): 1967, The Encyclopedia of Philosophy, The Macmillan Company & The Free Press, New York; Collier-Macmillan, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Einstein, A.: 1934, The World As I See It, Covici-Friede, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frankfort, H., Frankfort, H.A., Wilson, J.A. & Jacobsen, T.: 1949, Before Philosophy: The Intellectual Adventure of Ancient Man, Penguin Books, Harmondsworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansson, S.O.: 1991, ‘Is Anthroposophy Science?’, Conceptus 25(64), 37–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hebb, D.O.: 1980, Essay on Mind, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, New Jersey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hernegger, R.: 1989, Anthropologie zwischen Soziobiologie und Kulturwissenschaft, Habelt, Bonn.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kanitscheider, B.: 1993, ‘Las Ciencias y el Más Allá. Ideas para Establecer una Convivencia Armoniosa’, Folia Humanistica 31, 497–516.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kitcher, P.: 1982, Abusing Science: The Case Against Creationism, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kurtz, P.: 1986, The Transcendental Temptation. A Critique of Religion and the Paranormal Prometheus Books, Buffalo, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mackie, J.L.: 1977, Ethics. Inventing Right and Wrong, Penguin Books, Harmondsworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mackie, J.L.: 1982, The Miracle of Theism. Arguments for and against the Existence of God, Clarendon Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahner, M.: 1986, Kreationismus—Inhalt und Struktur antievolutionistischer Argumentation, Pädagogisches Zentrum, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahner, M.: 1989, ‘Warum eine Schöpfungstheorie nicht wissenschaftlich sein kann’, Praxis der Naturwissenschaften—Biologie 38(8), 33–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahner, M.: 1990, ‘““Wissenschaftlicher Kreationismus”—Eine Pseudowissenschaft mit religiösem Hintergrund’, Skeptiker 3(3), 15–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Margenau, H. & Varghese, R.A. (eds.): 1992, Cosmos, Bios, Theos, Open Court La Salle, Illinois.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, M.: 1990, Atheism—A Philosophical Justification, Temple University Press, Philadelphia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, M.: 1991, ‘Science Education and Moral Education’, in Matthews (ed.), pp. 102–113.

  • Matthews, M.R. (ed.): 1991, History, Philosophy and Science Teaching: Selected Readings, OISE Press, Toronto, Teachers College Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matthews, M.R.: 1992, ‘History, Philosophy, and Science Teaching: The Present Rapprochement’, Science & Education 1, 11–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merton, R.K.: 1973, The Sociology of Science. Theoretical and Empirical Investigations, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nowell-Smith, P.H.: 1967, ‘Religion and Morality’, in Edwards (ed.), Vol. 7, pp. 150–158.

  • O'Hear, A.: 1993, ‘Science and Religion’, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 4, 505–516.

    Google Scholar 

  • Priestley, J.: 1776, Disquisitions Relating to Matter and Spirit, Arno Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rachels, J.: 1991, Created from Animals. The Moral Implications of Darwinism, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rolston, H.: 1987, Science and Religion. A Critical Survey, Random House, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruchlis, H.: 1991, How Do You Know It's True? Discovering the Difference Between Science and Superstition, Prometheus Books, Buffalo, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, B.: 1967, Why l am not a Christian, George Allen & Unwin, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schopenhauer, A.: 1974, Parerga and Paralipomena. Short Philosophical Essays, Vol. 2, translated by E.F.J. Payne, Clarendon Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Settle, T.: 1990, ‘How to Avoid Implying that Physicalism is True: A Problem for Teachers of Science’, International Journal of Science Education 12, 258–264.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siegel, H.: 1984, ‘The Response to Creationism’, Educational Studies 15, 349–364.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siegel, H.: 1989, ‘The Rationality of Science, Critical Thinking, and Science Education’, Synthese 80, 9–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singer, P.: 1979, Practical Ethics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smart, J.J.C.: 1967, ‘Religion and Science’, in Edwards (ed.), Vol. 7, pp. 158–163.

  • Smith, G.H.: 1979, Atheism—The Case Against God., Prometheus Books, Buffalo, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, M. & Hoffmann, R.J. (eds.): 1989, What the Bible Really Says, Prometheus Books, Buffalo, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suchting, W.A.: 1994, ‘Notes on the Cultural Significance of the Sciences’, Science & Education 3, 1–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tuomela, R.: 1985, Science, Action, and Reality, D. Reidel, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vollmer, G.: 1990, ‘Against Instrumentalism’, in P.Weingartner and G.J.W.Dorn (eds.), Studies on Mario Bunge's Treatise, Rodopi, Amsterdam, pp. 245–259.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, A. D.: 1896, A History of the Warfare of Science with Theology in Christendom, Prometheus Books, Buffalo, New York, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolpert, L.: 1992, The Unnatural Nature of Science, Faber and Faber, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodger, J.H.: 1929, Biological Principles, Routledge & Kegan Paul, London; Humanities Press, New York, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woolnough, B.E.: 1991, ‘Faith in Science’, in Matthews (ed.), pp. 218–224.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Foundations and Philosophy of Science Unit, McGill University, 3479 Peel Street, H3A 1W7, Montreal, Canada

    Martin Mahner & Mario Bunge

Authors
  1. Martin Mahner
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Mario Bunge
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mahner, M., Bunge, M. Is religious education compatible with science education?. Sci Educ 5, 101–123 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00428612

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00428612

Keywords

Search

Navigation