Abstract
Mice immunized with a lysergic acid derivatized protein showed subsequent resistance to the effects of intravenously administered LSD as measured by the poke and rearing tests. Mice immunized with a tryptophyl conjugated protein displayed similar refractoriness relative to normal control mice. Thus, significant immunological cross reactivity as expressed by neutralization, was evident due to the common indole moiety of the two haptenic groups studied.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Cohen, M., Wakeley, H.: A comparative behavior study of ditran and LSD in mice, rats and dogs. Arch. int. Pharmacodyn. 173, 316–325 (1968).
Dandiya, P. O., Gupta, B. D., Gupta, M. L., Patni, S. K.: Effects of LSD on open field performance in rats. Psychopharmacologia (Berl.) 15, 333–340 (1969).
Edelhoch, H.: Spectroscopic determination of tryptophan and tyrosine in proteins. Biochemistry 6, 1948–1954 (1967).
McVeigh, T. A., Jr., Voss, E. W., Jr.: Properties of purified mouse homocytotropic antibody. J. Immunol. 103, 1349–1355 (1969).
Sheehan, J. C., Goodman, M., Hess, G. P.: Peptide derivatives containing hydroxyamino acids. J. Amer. chem. Soc. 78, 1367–1369 (1956).
—, Hess, G. P.: A new method of forming peptide bonds. J. Amer. chem. Soc. 77, 1067–1068 (1955).
Spector, S., Parker, C. W.: Morphine: radioimmunoassay. Science 168, 1347–1348 (1970).
Van Vunakis, H., Farrow, J. T., Gjika, H. B., Levine, L.: Specificity of the antibody receptor site to D-lysergamide: Model of a physiological receptor for lysergic acid diethylamide. Proc. nat. Acad. Sci. (Wash.) 68, 1483–1487 (1971).
Walk, R. D., Gibson, E. J.: A comparative and analytical study of visual depth perception. Psychol. Monogr. 75 (No. 15), 1–44 (1961).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Supported by a grant from the Pharmaceutical Manufacturers Association Foundation, Inc.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Voss, E.W., Berger, B.B. Neutralization of LSD by active immunization. Psychopharmacologia 26, 140–145 (1972). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00422100
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00422100