Skip to main content
Log in

Effect of antagonistic contractions on the reflex response of a bifunctional muscle

  • Published:
European Journal of Applied Physiology and Occupational Physiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

With reference to the concept that contraction of a muscle can be inhibited by contraction of its antagonists, the excitability of a bifunctional muscle, the soleus (plantarflexor and adductor) was studied during voluntary isometric contractions of the abductors in man. For this purpose, the soleus monosynaptic stretch reflex (MSR) was solicited by means of quick-release dorsiflexion movements which also induce inactivation of the tibialis anterior (unloading reflex). When different initial torques of dorsiflexion were developed (reference conditions) the amplitude of the soleus MSR was found to be related linearly to the maximal value of angular acceleration. When an abduction torque was superimposed (combined efforts), the soleus response was always depressed, but no significant reinforcement of this inhibition was observed when the abduction torque increased. From present results, and from classical data concerning reciprocal inhibition between soleus and tibialis anterior, it is concluded that the MSR of a bifunctional muscle is depressed when the antagonists of either one of its functions are voluntarily activated.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Angel RW, Eppler W, Iannone A (1965) Silent period produced by unloading of mucle during voluntary contraction. J Physiol (Lond) 180: 864–870

    Google Scholar 

  • Araki T, Eccles JC, Ito M (1960) Correlation of the inhibitory post-synaptic potential of motoneurones with the latency and time course of inhibition of monosynaptic reflexes. J Physiol (Lond) 154: 354–377

    Google Scholar 

  • Duchenne de Boulogne GB (1867) Physiologie des mouvements. Baillière et fils, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Eccles JC (1963) Postsynaptic and presynaptic inhibitory actions in the spinal cord. In: Moruzzi G, Fessard A, Jasper HH (eds) Brain mechanisms. Eisevier, Amsterdam, pp 1–18

    Google Scholar 

  • Garcia HA, Fisher MA, Gilai A (1979) H-relex analysis of segmental reflex excitability in flexor and extensor muscles. Neurology 29: 984–991

    Google Scholar 

  • Gottlieb GL, Agarwal GC (1971) Effect of initial conditions on the Hoffmann reflex. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 34: 226–230

    Google Scholar 

  • Gottlieb GL, Agarwal GC (1979) Response to sudden torques about ankle in man: Myotatic reflex. J Neurophysiol 42: 91–106

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffmann P (1918) über die Beziehungen der Sehnenreflexe zur willkürlichen Bewegung und zum Tonus. Z Biol 68: 351–370

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffmann P (1922) Untersuchungen über die Eigenreflexe (Sehnenreflexe) menschlicher Muskeln. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Hugon M (1973) Methodology of the Hoffmann reflex in man. In: Desmedt JE (ed) New developments in electromyography and clinical neurophysiology, vol 3. Karger, Basel, pp 277–293

    Google Scholar 

  • Kapandji IA (1975) Physiologie articulaire. Maloine, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Kearney RE (1978) Simulation of the human neuromuscular response to ankle rotation with a segmental reflex model. Comput Biol Med 8: 329–341

    Google Scholar 

  • Morin C, Pierrot-Deseilligny E (1977) Role of Ia afferents in the soleus motoneurones inhibition during a tibialis anterior voluntary contraction in man. Exp Brain Res 27: 509–522

    Google Scholar 

  • O'Connell AL (1958) Electromyographic study of certain leg muscles during movements of the free foot and during standing. Am J Phys Med 37: 289–301

    Google Scholar 

  • Paillard J (1955) Réflexes et régulations d'origine proprioceptive chez l'homme. Thèse Doctorat d'Etat, Arnette, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Perot C (1979) Approche biomécanique de la difonctionnalité musculaire. Thèse 3ème cycle, Compiègne

  • Perot C, Goubel F (1980) Control mechanism of bifunctional muscles: a reflex approach. In: Morecki A, Fidelus K (eds) Biomechanics VII. University Park Press, Baltimore, pp 82–86

    Google Scholar 

  • Perot C, Goubel F (1981) Synergy between bifunctional muscles at the ankle joint. Eur J Appl Physiol (in press)

  • Pertuzon E, Lestienne F (1971) Influence des valeurs initiales de la position de l'articulation et de la force sur les modalités des réflexes évoqués par “quick-release”. J Physiol (Paris) 63: 264A-265A

    Google Scholar 

  • Vallbo AB (1974) Human muscle spindle discharge during isometric voluntary contractions. Amplitude relation between spindle frequency and torque. Acta Physiol Scand 90: 319–336

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Supported in part by a DGRST grant (78.7.2347)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pérot, C., Goubel, F. Effect of antagonistic contractions on the reflex response of a bifunctional muscle. Europ. J. Appl. Physiol. 48, 51–58 (1982). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00421164

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00421164

Key words

Navigation