Skip to main content
Log in

A general duty to supply only safe goods in the community: Some remarks from a British perspective

Die generelle Pflicht, in der EG ausschließlich sichere Produkte anzubieten: einige Anmerkungen aus britischer Sicht

  • Current Developments In Consumer Law
  • Published:
Journal of Consumer Policy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

On 20 April 1989, the Commission issued COM (89) 162, which is a proposal for a Directive designed to establish a Community legal framework to guarantee product safety. Such a regime would have the dual aim of securing free trade while also maintaining effective consumer protection. This paper demonstrates the vital role which would be played by standards in such a framework and explains how Community law can prevent a Member State adopting a purely domestic approach to standards of safety and quality. The paper investigates the extent to which the United Kingdom's statutory general requirement to supply only safe goods, introduced in 1987, constitutes a model for a parallel Community initiative. The paper concludes by emphasising that the twin goals of free trade and consumer protection can only be achieved through a proper resource commitment to effective standards-making.

Zusammenfassung

Am 20. April 1989 veröffentlichte die EG-Kommission die Mitteilung KOM 89/162, bei der es sich um einen Vorschlag für eine Richtlinie handelt, die die gesetzlichen Rahmenbedingungen für Produktsicherheit in der EG garantieren soll und gleichzeitig zwei Ziele verfolgt: zum einen die Gewährleistung von freiem Handelsverkehr, zum anderen die Stärkung des Verbraucherschutzes.

Der Beitrag beschreibt die zentrale Rolle, die in diesem Zusammenhang den Standards zukommt, und erläutert, wie EG-Recht einen Mitgliedstaat davon abhalten kann, einen rein nationalen Ansatz zur Etablierung von Sicherheits- und Qualitätsstandards zu verfolgen. Er untersucht ferner das Ausmaß, in welchem die im Jahre 1987 in England eingeführte allgemeine gesetzliche Verpflichtung, nur sichere Güter anzubieten, ein Modell für eine enstprechende EG-Initiative darstellen kann. Der Beitrag stellt abschließend fest, daß das Doppelziel von Freihandel und Verbraucherschutz nur erreicht werden kann, wenn ausreichende Mittel bereitgestellt werden, um wirkungsvolle Standards ausarbeiten zu können.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Borrie, G. (1984). The development of consumer law and policy. London: Stevens.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borrie, G. (1988). Consumer protection laws for the 1990s. Journal of Business Law, pp. 116–126.

  • Bourgoignie, T., & Trubek, D. (1987). Consumer law, common markets, and federalism in Europe and the United States. Berlin: de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cecchini, P. (1988). Europe 1992: The overall challenge. Brussels: The EC Commission. (A survey in 16 volumes of the “Cost of non-Europe.” Volume 1 — Summary — Catalogue number: CB - PP - 88 - B14 - EN - C.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehlermann, C. (1987). The internal market following the Single Act. Common Market Law Review, 24, 361–409.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Consumer Law Group (1987). Consumer protection in the EEC after ratification of the Single Act. Journal of Consumer Policy, 10, 319–334.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fairest, P. (1988). Guide to the Consumer Protection Act 1987. Bicester, U.K.: CCH Editions.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forwood, N., & Clough, M. (1986). The Single European Act and free movement. European Law Review, 11, 383–408.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krämer, L. (1986). EEC consumer law. Brussels: Story Scientia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawlor, E. (1988). Individual choice and higher growth. Brussels: The EC Commission. (Catalogue number: CB - PP - 88 - 007 - EN - C.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Merkin, R. (1987). A guide to the Consumer Protection Act 1987. London: Financial Training Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Micklitz, H.-W. (1986). Perspectives on a European directive on the safety of technical consumer goods. Common Market Law Review, 23, 617–640.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mortelmans, K. (1988). Minimum harmonization and consumer law. European Consumer Law Journal, 3, 2–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pelkmans, J. (1987). The new approach to technical harmonization and standardization. Journal of Common Market Studies, 25, 249–269.

    Google Scholar 

  • Temple Lang, J. (1988). Implications of the European Community's environment policy for Turkey. European Law Review, 13, 403–410.

    Google Scholar 

  • Voorst, B. J. M., & Van Dam, J. S. (1988). Europe 1992: Free movement of goods in the wider context of a changing Europe. Common Market Law Review, 25, 693–709.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waelbroeck, D. (1988). L'harmonisation des regles et normes techniques dans la CEE. Cahiers du Droit Européen, 24, 243–275.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weatherill, S. (1987). Consumer safety legislation in the United Kingdom. European Consumer Law Journal, 2, 81–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weatherill, S. (1988). Consumer safety legislation in the United Kingdom and Article 30 EEC. European Law Review, 13, 87–105.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Additional information

Stephen Weatherill is Lecturer in Law at the University of Manchester, Faculty of Law, Oxford Road, Manchester M13 9PL, U.K.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Weatherill, S. A general duty to supply only safe goods in the community: Some remarks from a British perspective. J Consum Policy 13, 79–89 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00411871

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00411871

Keywords

Navigation