Summary
In a “double-blind” comparative study between chlorprothixene (Truxal) and chlorpromazine treatment in hospitalized, relatively acute patients we found that among all psychotic patients (except the depressive) as well as the hyperactive, physically agitated patients, the 74 chlorprothixene treated patients showed equally good or better improvement than the 89 chlorpromazine treated.
The minor side- effects appeared to be equally frequent during the two treatments, but chlorprothixene seemed to show no serious toxic effects, and particularly the extrapyramidal side-effects were so rare and so little pronounced that we found chlorprothixene to be preferable to chlorpromazine. It should be pointed out that the period of observation was relatively short (in 127 patients less than 7 weeks).
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Arnold, O. H.: Klinische Erfahrungen mit dem Neuroleptikum Truxal. Wien. med. Wschr. 109, 892–898 (1959).
Madsen, E., and J. Ravn: Indledende forsøg med behandling med et nyt psykofarmakon Truxal. Nord. psykiat. Tidsskr. 13, 82–86 (1959).
Møller-Nielsen, I., P. V. Petersen and J. Ravn: Truxal, et nyt dansk psykofarmakon. Ugeskr. Læg. 121, 1433–1440 (1959).
Sonne, L. M.: Placebo-undersøgelse. Nord. Med. 59, 317–320 (1958).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Remvig, J., Sonne, L.M. Chlorprothixene (“Truxal”) compared to chlorpromazine. Psychopharmacologia 2, 203–208 (1961). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00407980
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00407980