Skip to main content
Log in

The ecological role of ants in two Mexican agroecosystems

  • Published:
Oecologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

The development of the ant communities and their foraging dynamics were studied in two annual agroecosystems of the Mexican tropical lowlands: a “forest milpa” of corn, beans, and squash made by cutting and buring 40-year-old forest, and a “field milpa” of corn, beans, and squash made by plowing 1-year-old second growth. The ant community was sampled using tuna fish baits 26, 52, 110 and 353 days after planting. Although immediately after planting the same number of ant species occurred in each milpa type, thereafter the ant faunas diverged. The field milpa became completely dominated by the native fire ant, Solenopsis geminata, while the number of ant species in the forest milpa gradually increased over time, reaching eight species 110 days after planting and 14 species by 353 days. Initially S. geminata dominated the ant fauna in the forest milpa (occurring on 90% of the baits), but by 353 days planting it was found on only 26% of the occupied baits. Ant foraging efficiency, as measured by proportion of tuna baits occupied and the removal rates of dead Drosophila fly baits, was much higher (by a factor of 2 to 3) in the field than the forest milpa. This was caused by the extremely high density of S. geminata colonies in the field milpa. The simple Solenopsis-dominated community of the field milpa may be much more effective in biological control than the more diverse community of the forest milpa. Although S. geminata has potential negative impacts in annual agroecosystems (it stings, eats corn seeds, and guards homopterams), its overall impact appears to be beneficial. As forested areas of the lowland wet tropics are increasingly cut and converted to annual agriculture, the primary ant inhabitant of these highly disturbed environments, S. geminata, will necessarily play a much more significant ecological role in agroecosystems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bentley B (1977) The protective function of ants visiting the extrafloral nectaries of Bixa orellana (Bixaceae). J Ecol 65:27–38

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown ES (1959) Immature natfall of coconuts in the Solomon Islands. II. Changes in ant populations and their relation to vegetation. Bull Entomol Res 50:523–558

    Google Scholar 

  • Buren WF, Whitcomb WH (1977) Ants of citrus: some considerations. Proc Int Soc Citriculture 2:496–498

    Google Scholar 

  • Burns EC, Melancon DG (1977) Effects of imported fire ant (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) invasion on lone-star tick (Acarina: Ixodidae) populations. J Med Entomol 14:247–249

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Carroll CF (1974) The community ecology of tropical arboreal ants. Ph D Thesis, University of Chicago

  • Carroll CR, Janzen DH (1973) Ecology of foraging by ants. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 4:231–251

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carrol CR, Risch SJ (1982) The dynamics of seed harvesting in early successional communities by a tropical ant, Solenopsis geminata. Ecol (in review)

  • Das GM (1959) Observations on the association of ants with coccids of tea. Bull Entomol Res 50:437–482

    Google Scholar 

  • Garcia CE (1935) A field study on the citrus green bug Rhynchocoori serratus Donovan. Philippine J Agric 6:311–325

    Google Scholar 

  • Glancey BM, Wojoik DP, Craig CH, Mitchell JH (1976) Ants of Mobile County, Alabama, USA, as monitored by bait transects. Ga Entomol Soc 11:191–197

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenslade PJM (1971) Interspecific competition and frequency changes among ants in Solomon Islands coconut plantations. J App Ecol 8:323–352

    Google Scholar 

  • Groff GW, Howard CW (1925) The cultured citrus ant of South China. Lingnaam Agric. Res 2:108–114

    Google Scholar 

  • Hensley SD, Long WH, Roddy LR, McCormick WJ, Concienne EJ (1961) Effect of insecticides on the predaceous arthropod fauna of Louisiana sugarcane fields. J Econ Entomol 54:146–149

    Google Scholar 

  • Janzen DH (1966) Coevolution of mutualism between ants and acacias in Central America. Evolution 20:249–275

    Google Scholar 

  • Leston D (1973) The ant mosaic-tropical tree crops and the limiting of pests and diseases. Pans 19:311–341

    Google Scholar 

  • Leston D (1978) A neotropical ant mosaic. Ann Entomol Soc Am 71:649–653

    Google Scholar 

  • Majer JD (1976a) The maintenance of the ant mosaic in Ghana cocoa farms. J Appl Ecol 13:123–144

    Google Scholar 

  • Majer JD (1976b) The ant mosaic in Ghana cocoa farms: further structural considerations. J Appl Ecol 13:145–155

    Google Scholar 

  • Majer JD (1976c) The influence of ants and ant manipulation on the cocoa farm fauna. J Appl Ecol 13:157–175

    Google Scholar 

  • Morrill WL (1977) Red imported fire ant foraging in a greenhouse. Environ Entomol 6:416–418

    Google Scholar 

  • Morrill WL (1978) Red imported fire ant predation on the alfalfa weevil and pea aphid. J Econ Entomol 71:867–868

    Google Scholar 

  • Negm AA, Hensley SD (1969) Evaluation of certain biological control agents of the sugarcane borer in Louisiana. J Econ Entomol 62:1008–1013

    Google Scholar 

  • Petal J: The role of ants in ecosystems, chapter 10. In: MV Brian (ed), Production Ecology of Ants and Termites, IBP #13. New York: Cambridge University Press 1978

    Google Scholar 

  • Pimentel D (1955) Relationship of ants to fly control in Puerto Rico. J. Econ. Entomol 48:28–30

    Google Scholar 

  • Pimentel D, Uhler L (1969) Ants and the control of house flies in the Philippines. J Econ Entomol 62:248

    Google Scholar 

  • Risch SJ (1980) Ants as important predators of rootworm eggs in the neotropics. J Econ Entomol 74:88–90

    Google Scholar 

  • Risch SJ, Carroll CR (1983) Effect of a keystone predaceous ant, Solenopsis geminata on Arthropods in a Tropical Agroecosystem. Ecology 64(1):(in press)

  • Room MP (1975) Relative distributions of ant species in cocoa plantations in Papua New Guinea J Appl Ecol 12:47–62

    Google Scholar 

  • Saks ME, Carroll CR (1980) Ant foraging activity in tropical agroecosystems. Agroecosystems 6:177–188

    Google Scholar 

  • Sommer A (1976) Attempt at an assessment of the world's tropical moist forests. Unasylvia 28:5–24

    Google Scholar 

  • Sterling W (1978) Fortuitous biological suppresion of the boll weevil by the red imported fire ant. Environ Entomol 7:564–568

    Google Scholar 

  • Steyn JJ (1954) The pugnacious ant (Anoplolepis custodiens Smith) and its relation to the control of citrus scales of Lotaba. Mem Entomol Soc S Afr 3:1096

    Google Scholar 

  • Summerlin JW, Olson JK, Blume RR, Aga A, Bay DE (1977) Red imported fire ant effects on Onthophagus gazella and the horn fly. Environ. Entomol 6:440–442

    Google Scholar 

  • West RC, Psuty NP, Thom BG: The Tabasco Lowlands of Southeastern Mexico. Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University Press 1969

    Google Scholar 

  • Yasumatsu K: Rice-stem bores. In: Delucchi VL (ed) Studies in Biological Control, IBP#9. New York: Cambridge University Press 1976

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Risch, S.J., Carroll, C.R. The ecological role of ants in two Mexican agroecosystems. Oecologia 55, 114–119 (1982). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00386726

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00386726

Keywords

Navigation