Abstract
There is a growing literature that attempts to define the substantive rights of employees in the workplace, a.k.a. the duties of employers toward their employees. Following Nozick, this article argues that — so long as there is a competitive labor market — to set up a class of moral rights in the workplace invades workers' rights to freely choose the terms and conditions of employment they judge best.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Birch, David: 1981, ‘Who creates jobs?’, Public Interest (vol. 65), fall.
Donaldson, Thomas: 1982, Corporations and Morality (Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J.).
Frank, Robert: 1985, Choosing the Right Pond (Oxford University Press, New York).
Goldman, Alan: 1980, ‘Business ethics: profits, utilities, and moral rights’, Philosophy and Public Affairs 9, no. 3.
McKenzie, Robert: 1981, ‘The case for plant closures’, Policy Review 15, winter.
Nozick, Robert: 1974, Anarchy, State and Utopia (Basic Books, New York).
Schwartz, Adina: 1984, ‘Autonomy in the workplace’, in Tom Regan, ed., Just Business (Random House, N.Y.).
Werhane, Patricia H.: 1985, Persons, Rights and Corporations (Prentice Hall, N.Y.).
Williamson, Oliver E.: 1975, Markets and Hierarchies (Free Press, N.Y.).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Ian Maitland is associate professor of business, government and society at the University of Minnesota. He is author of The Causes of Industrial Disordoer (Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1983) and articles in the Journal of Politics, Academy of Management Review, Journal of Business Strategy, British Journal of Industrial Relations, California Management Review and elsewhere. In 1988 he ran unsuccessfully for U.S. Congress.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Maitland, I. Rights in the workplace: A Nozickian argument. J Bus Ethics 8, 951–954 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00383431
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00383431