Summary
A spherical domain within an anisotropic crystalline material is considered to have elastic constants differing from those of the remainder of the material; the particular case where the constants vanish within the sphere represents a cavity. The elastic fields inside and immediately outside the spherical domain, together with the interaction energy, are calculated for the case of a uniform stress applied at infinity. Specific examples are given for aluminum, copper, and pyrite, and numerical results are compared with those for isotropic material. The tensile stress concentration is larger for aluminum than for isotropic material while the opposite is true for pyrite. Similarly, the interaction energy of the inhomogeneity is larger for an anisotropic material than an isotropic material, but in pyrite the reverse is found.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Eshelby, J. D., Proc. Roy. Soc. A 241 (1957) 376.
Eshelby, J. D., Proc. Roy. Soc. A 252 (1959) 561.
Kröner, E., Acta Met. 2 (1954) 301.
Bhargava, R. D. and H. C. Radhakrishna, J. Phys. Soc. Japan 19 (1964) 396.
Robinson, K., J. Appl. Phys. 22 (1951) 1045.
Mura, T., Phil. Mag. 8 (1963) 843.
Burgers, J. M., Proc. Kon. Nederl. Akad. Wetensch. 42 (1939) 378.
Seeger, A., Handbuch der Physik 7 (1955), Pt. 1, p. 525.
Goodier, J. N., Phil. Mag. 23 (1937) 1017.
Schmid, E. and W. Boas, Kristallplastizität mit besonderer Berücksichtigung der Metalle, Springer, Berlin 1935.
Sadowsky, M. A. and E. Sternberg, J. Appl. Mech. 71 (1949) 149.
Eshelby, J. D., Phil. Trans. A 244 (1951) 87.
Eshelby, J. D., Progr. in Solid State Phys. 3 (1956) 79.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hung, Y.C. The effect of a spherical inclusion in an anisotropic solid. Appl. Sci. Res. 18, 436–445 (1968). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00382364
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00382364