Skip to main content
Log in

Pollinator foraging behavior and pollen collection on the floral morphs of tristylous Pontederia cordata L.

  • Original Papers
  • Published:
Oecologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

The foraging behavior of the pollinators of tristylous Pontederia cordata was studied to determine if differences in floral morphology would lead to preferential visitation of the floral morphs. Although nectar production is not different in the three floral morphs, differences in the production and size of pollen grains produced by the three anther levels results in the morphs offering variable amounts of resources to pollen-collecting insects. Bumblebees (Bombus spp.) and the solitary bee Melissodes apicata used P. cordata primarily as a nectar source and therefore did not seem to exhibit any morph preference. In contrast, honeybees visited flowers mainly for pollen and preferred to forage on long-level anthers of the short-and mid-styled morphs. An analysis of the composition of corbicular pollen loads indicated that, relative to the frequency of production in the population: 1) honeybees collected an excess of pollen from long-level anthers; 2) bumblebees collected the three types of pollen without any apparent preference; and 3) M. apicata preferentially collected pollen from the short-level anthers — presumably because their proboscides are modified by the presence of tiny hairs. The results suggest that P. cordata in Ontario is serviced by a diverse, unspecialized pollinator fauna which is not co-adapted to the tristylous floral polymorphism.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barrett SCH, Anderson JM (1985) Variation in expression of trimorphic incompatibility in Pontederia cordata L. (Pontederiaceae). Theor Appl Genet 70:355–362

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrett SCH, Glover DE (1985) On the Darwinian hypothesis of the adaptive significance of tristyly. Evolution 39:766–774

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrett SCH, Wolfe LM (1986) Pollen heteromorphism as a tool in studies of the pollination process in Pontederia cordata L. In: Mulcahy DL, Bergamini Mulcahy G, Ottaviano E (eds) Biotechnology and Ecology of Pollen. Springer Berlin Heidelberg New York pp 435–442

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrett SCH, Price SD, Shore JS (1983) Male fertility and anisoplethic population structure in tristylous Pontederia cordata (Pontederiaceae). Evolution 37:745–759

    Google Scholar 

  • Charlesworth D (1979) The evolution and breakdown of tristyly. Evolution 33:489–498

    Google Scholar 

  • Darwin C (1877) The different forms of flowers on plants of the same species. John Murray, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Dulberger R (1970) Tristyly in Lythrum junceum. New Phytol 69:751–759

    Google Scholar 

  • Ennos RA (1981) Quantitative studies of the mating system in two sympatric species of Ipomoea (Convolvulaceae). Genetica 57:93–98

    Google Scholar 

  • Ganders FR (1979) The biology of heterostyly. New Zealand J Bot 17:607–635

    Google Scholar 

  • Glover DE, Barrett SCH (1983) Trimorphic incompatibility in Mexican populations of Pontederia sagittata Presl. (Pontederiaceae). New Phytol 95:439–455

    Google Scholar 

  • Harding J, Mankinen CB (1967) Genetics of Lupinus. I. Variations in flower color from natural populations of Lipinus nanus. Canad J Bot 45:1831–1836

    Google Scholar 

  • Laberge WE (1956) A revision of the bees of the genus Melissodes in North and Central America. Part II. (Hymenoptera, Apidae). The University of Kansas Science Bulletin 38:533–578

    Google Scholar 

  • Mulcahy DL, Caporello D (1970) Pollen flow within a tristylous species, Lythrum salicaria. Am J Bot 57:1027–1030

    Google Scholar 

  • Ornduff R (1966) The breeding system of Pontederia cordata L. Bull Torr Bot Cl 93:407–416

    Google Scholar 

  • Ornduff R (1971) The reproductive system of Jepsonia heterandra. Evolution 25:300–311

    Google Scholar 

  • Ornduff R (1975) Pollen flow in Lythrum junceum, a tristylous species. New Phytol 75:161–166

    Google Scholar 

  • Price SD, Barrett SCH (1982) Tristyly in Pontederia cordata (Pontederiaceae). Can J Bot 60:897–905

    Google Scholar 

  • Price SD, Barrett SCH (1984) The function and adaptive significance of tristyly in Pontederia cordata L. (Pontederiaceae). Biol J Linn Soc 21:315–329

    Google Scholar 

  • Primack RB, Silander JA Jr (1975) Measuring the relative importance of different pollinators to plants. Nature 255:143–144

    Google Scholar 

  • Schemske DW, Horvitz CC (1984) Variation among floral visitors in pollination ability: a precondition for mutualism specialization. Science 225:519–521

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanton ML (1987) Reproductive biology of petal color variants in wild populations of Raphanus sativus: I. Pollinator response to color morphs. Am J Bot 74:178–187

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomson JD, Stratton DA (1985) Floral morphology and crosspollination in Erythronium grandiflorum (Liliaceae). Am J Bot 72:433–437

    Google Scholar 

  • Waser NM, Price MV (1981) Pollinator choice and stabilizing selection for flower color in Delphinium nelsonii. Evolution 35:376–390

    Google Scholar 

  • Weller SG (1981) Pollination biology of heteromorphic populations of Oxalis alpina (Rose) Knuth (Oxalidaceae) in southeastern Arizona. Bot J Linn Soc 83:189–198

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolfe LM (1985) The pollination dynamics of Pontederia cordata L. (Pontederiaceae). M.Sc. thesis. University of Toronto. p 129

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wolfe, L.M., Barrett, S.C.H. Pollinator foraging behavior and pollen collection on the floral morphs of tristylous Pontederia cordata L.. Oecologia 74, 347–351 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00378928

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00378928

Key words

Navigation