Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Pollen host selection by a broadly polylectic halictid bee in relation to resource availability

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Arthropod-Plant Interactions Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The relationship between utilized and available resources in the same environment has not yet been studied in most wild bees. In a riparian forest, a total of 15 pollen types from 10 plant families were identified from pollen provisions of 17 nests of the wood-dwelling Augochlora amphitrite (Hymenoptera: Halictidae) for which only floral records have been known. During the foraging period, only five out of 108 available flowering species were visited intensively (more than 10 %) for pollen. As more than three families and 32.2 % of the available plant families were visited for pollen, the broad polylecty category was inferred. Like in other Augochlora species, a variety of floral types was visited by A. amphitrite, in agreement with its broadly polylectic foraging habit. The selection index was positive for the highly abundant Ludwigia (Onagraceae) and the rare Gymnocoronis spilanthoides (Asteraceae). The intensive foraging on Ludwigia could indicate temporary specialization for this abundant pollen resource. The tendency of this bee to visit intensively one flower type for pollen suggests that bee individuals had to learn to handle this abundant flower type. Pollen analysis complemented with field observations on floral resource availability proved to be helpful tools to provide information on the foraging behaviour of a wild bee in its natural environment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arnold SEJ, Le Comber SC, Chittka L (2009a) Flower color phenology in European grassland and woodland habitats, through the eyes of pollinators. Isr J Plant Sci 57(3):211–230

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arnold SEJ, Savolainen V, Chittka L (2009b) Flower colours along an alpine altitude gradient, seen though the eyes of fly and bee pollinators. Arthrop Plant Interact 3(1):27–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arnold SEJ, Faruq S, Savolainen V, McOwan PW, Chitkka L (2010) FReD: the floral reflectance database—a web portal for analyses of flower colours. PLoS ONE 5(12):e14287

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Buchmann SL, Nabhan GP (1996) The forgotten pollinators. Island Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Cabrera AL (1971) Fitogeografía de la República Argentina. Bol Soc Argentina Bot 14:1–42

    Google Scholar 

  • Cabrera AL, Willink A (1973) Biogeografía de América Latina. Secretaría General de la Organización de los Estados Americanos, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Cabrera AL, Zardini EM (1978) Manual de la flora de los alrededores de Buenos Aires, 2nd edn. Editorial ACME S.A.C.I, Buenos Aires

    Google Scholar 

  • Cane JH, Sipes S (2006) Characterizing floral specialization by bees: analytical methods and a revised lexicon for oligolecty. In: Waser NM, Ollerton J (eds) Plant–pollinator interactions. From specialization to generalization. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 99–122

    Google Scholar 

  • Cane JH, Gardner DR, Harrison PA (2011) Nectar and pollen sugars constituting larval provisions of the alfalfa leaf-cutting bee (Megachile rotundata) (Hymenoptera: Apiformes: Megachilidae). Apidologie 42:401–408

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chittka L (1996) Does bee colour vision predated the evolution of flower colour? Naturwiss 83:136–138

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chittka L, Raine NE (2006) Recognition of flowers by pollinators. Curr Opin Plant Biol 9:428–435

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chittka L, Waser NM (1997) Why red flower are not invisible for bees. Isr J Plant Sci 45:169–183

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chittka L, Thomson JD, Waser NM (1999) Flower constancy, insect psychology and plant evolution. Naturwiss 86:361–377

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cortopassi-Laurino M (1982) Divisão de recursos tróficos entre abelhas sociais, principalmente em Apis mellifera Linneus e Trigona (Trigona) spinipes Fabricius (Apidae, Hymenoptera). Thesis: Instituto de Biociências, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, p 180

    Google Scholar 

  • Cortopassi-Laurino M, Ramalho M (1988) Pollen harvest by Africanized Apis mellifera and Trigona spinipes in Sao Paulo, botanical and ecological views. Apidologie 19:1–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Costanza R, d’Arge R, de Groot R, Farber S, Grasso M et al (1997) The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature 387:253–260

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cripps C, Rust RW (1989) Pollen foraging in a community of Osmia bees (Hymenoptera: Megachilidae). Environ Entomol 18:582–589

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dalmazzo M, Roig-Alsina A (2011) Revision of the species of the New World genus Augochlora (Hymenoptera, Halictidae) occurring in the southern temperate areas of its range. Zootaxa 2750:15–32

    Google Scholar 

  • Dalmazzo M, Roig-Alsina A (2012) Nest structures and notes on social behavior of Augochlora amphitrite (Schrottky) (Hymenoptera, Halictidae). J Hym Res 26:17–29

    Google Scholar 

  • De Klerk P, Joosten H (2007) The difference between pollen types and plant taxa: a plea for clarity and scientific freedom. Quat Sci J 56:162–171

    Google Scholar 

  • Free JB (1963) The flower constancy of honeybees. J Anim Ecol 32:119–131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Free JB (1970) The flower constancy of bumblebees. J Anim Ecol 39:395–402

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joosten H, De Klerk P (2002) What’s in a name? Some thougthson pollen classification, identification, and nomenclature in quaternary palynology. Rev Paleobot Palynol 122:29–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kent M, Coker P (1992) Vegetation description and analysis: a practical approach. CRC Press, Belhaven Press, Florida, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Kevan PG, Giurfa M, Chittka L (1996) Why are there so many and so few white flowers? Trends Plant Sci 1:280–284

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kleinert-Giovannini A, Imperatriz-Fonseca VL (1987) Aspects of the trophic niche of Melipona marginata marginata Lepeletier (Apidae, Meliponinae). Apidologie 18:69–100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacIvor JS, Cabral JM, Packer L (2014) Pollen specialization by solitary bees in an urban landscape. Urban Ecosyst 17:139–147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manly BFJ, McDonald LL, Thomas DL (1993) Resource selection by animals. Statistical design and analysis for field studies. Chapman and Hall, London

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Michener CD (2007) The bees of the world, 2nd edn. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore

    Google Scholar 

  • Moure JS, Hurd PD (1987) An annotated catalog of the halictid bees of the Western Hemisphere (Hymenoptera, Apoidea). Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Müller A, Kuhlmann M (2008) Pollen hosts of western palaearctic bees of the genus Colletes (Hymenoptera: Colletidae): the Asteraceae paradox. Biol J Linn Soc 95:719–733

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Neill KM, O’Neill RP, Blodgett S, Fultz J (2004) Composition of pollen loads of Megachile rotundata in relation of flower diversity (Hymenoptera: Megachilidae). J Kans Entomol Soc 77:619–625

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pedro SRM, Camargo JMF (1991) Interactions on floral resources between the Africanized honey bee Apis mellifera L and the native bee community (Hymenoptera: Apoidea) in a natural “cerrado” ecosystem in southeast Brazil. Apidologie 22:397–415

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Percival M (1947) Pollen collection by Apis mellifera. New Phytol 46:142–173

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pernal SF, Currie RW (2002) Discrimination and preferences for pollen-based cues by foraging honeybees, Apis mellifera L. Anim Behav 63:369–390

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peters VE, Carroll CR, Cooper RJ, Greenberg R, Solis M (2013) The contribution of plant species with a steady–state flowering phenology to native bee conservation and bee pollination service. Insect Conserv Divers 6:45–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Proctor M, Yeo P, Lack A (1996) The natural history of pollination. Timber Press, Portland

    Google Scholar 

  • Raine NE, Chittka L (2007) Flower constancy and memory dynamics in bumblebees (Hymenoptera: Apidae: Bombus). Entomol Gen 29:179–199

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramalho M, Imperatriz-Fonseca VL, Kleinert-Giovannini A, Cortopassi-Laurino M (1985) Exploitation of floral resources by Plebeia remota Holmberg (Apidae, Meliponinae). Apidologie 16:307–330

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raw A (1974) Pollen preferences of three Osmia species (Hymenoptera). Oikos 25:54–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rust RW (1990) Spatial and temporal heterogeneity of pollen foraging in Osmia lignaria propinqua (Hymenoptera: Megachilidae). Environ Entomol 19:332–338

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Small E, Brookers B, Lefkovitch LP, Fairey DT (1997) A preliminary analysis of the floral preferences of alfalfa leafcutting bee, Megachile rotundata. Can Field Nat 111:445–453

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith AR, López-Quintero IJ, Moreno-Patiño JE, Roubik DN, Wcislo WT (2012) Pollen use by Megalopta sweet bees in relation to resource availability in a tropical forest. Ecol Entomol 37:309–317

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • StatPoint Technologies (2010) Statgraphics® Centurion XVI. StatPoint Technologies, Inc., http://www.STATGRAPHICS.com

  • Stubbs CS, Drummond FA, Osgood EA (1994) Osmia ribifloris biedermannii and Megachile rotundata (Hymenoptera: Megachilidae) introduced into the lowbush blueberry agroecosystem in Maine. J Kans Entomol Soc 67:173–185

    Google Scholar 

  • Vossler FG, Tellería MC, Cunningham M (2010) Floral resources foraged by Geotrigona argentina (Apidae, Meliponini) in the Argentine Dry Chaco forest. Grana 49:142–153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vossler FG, Fagúndez GA, Blettler DG (2014) Variability of food stores of Tetragonisca fiebrigi (Schwarz) (Apidae, Meliponini) from the Argentine Chaco based on pollen analysis. Sociobiology 61(4):449–460

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waddington KD, Holden LR (1979) Optimal foraging: on flower selection by bees. Am Nat 114:179–196

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waser NM, Ollerton J (2006) Plant–pollinator interactions. From specialization to generalization. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Wcislo WT, Gonzalez VH, Engel MS (2003) Nesting and social behavior of a wood-dwelling neotropical bee, Augochlora isthmii (Schwarz), and notes on a new species, A. alexanderi Engel (Hymenoptera: Halictidae). J Kans Entomol Soc 76:588–602

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams NM (2003) Use of novel pollen species by specialist and generalist solitary bees (Hymenoptera: Megachilidae). Oecologia 134:228–237

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Williams NM, Tepedino VJ (2003) Consistent mixing of near and distant resources in foraging bouts by the solitary mason bee Osmia Lignaria. Behav Ecol 14(1):141–149

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wodehouse RP (1935) Pollen grains. Mc. Graw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Zillikens A, Steiner J, Mihalkó Z (2001) Nest of Augochlora (A.) esox in bromeliads, a previously unknown site for sweat bees (Hymenoptera: Halictidae). Stud Neotrop Fauna Environ 36:137–142

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank the personnel of the reservation Refugio Natural Educativo Ribera Norte, Guillermo Bryant, Ricardo Camina, and Gustavo Suarez for their invaluable help and cooperation. We thank Arturo Roig-Alsina and Nora Brea for providing comments on the manuscript. We also thank the editor and reviewers for their constructive suggestions. This study was supported by CONICET (Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Entomología, Facultad de Humanidades y Ciencias, Universidad Nacional del Litoral, CONICET, Paraje El Pozo s/n, 3000, Santa Fe, Argentina

    Milagros Dalmazzo

  2. Laboratorio de Actuopalinología, CICyTTP-CONICET/FCyT-UADER, Dr. Materi y España, E3105BWA, Diamante, Entre Ríos, Argentina

    Favio Gerardo Vossler

Authors
  1. Milagros Dalmazzo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Favio Gerardo Vossler
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Milagros Dalmazzo.

Additional information

Handling Editor: Lars Chittka.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 28 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Dalmazzo, M., Vossler, F.G. Pollen host selection by a broadly polylectic halictid bee in relation to resource availability. Arthropod-Plant Interactions 9, 253–262 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11829-015-9364-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11829-015-9364-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation