Skip to main content
Log in

Generalist predators and the importance of spatial density dependence

  • Original Papers
  • Published:
Oecologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Conclusion

The model examples in this paper illustrate that non-random spatial distributions of predation or parasitism by polyphagous natural enemies will not necessarily promote population persistence. The test of whether such responses are stabilizing requires the spatial distribution of predation to be examined over a range of total prey densities. As shown in Fig. 2, a contribution to stability will occur if average predation from each spatial response tends to be positively related to total prey density.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Chesson PL, Murdoch WW (1986) Aggregation of risk: relationships among host-parasitoid models. Am Nat 127:696–715

    Google Scholar 

  • Beddington JR, Free CA, Lawton JH (1978) Modelling biological control: on the characteristics of successful natural enemies. Nature 273:513–519

    Google Scholar 

  • Hassell MP (1978) The Dynamics of Arthropod Predator-Prey Systems. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Hassell MP (1982) Pattern of parasitism by insect parasitoids in patchy environments. Ecol Entomol 7:365–377

    Google Scholar 

  • Hassell MP, May RM (1973) Stability in insect host-parasite models. J Anim Ecol 442:693–726

    Google Scholar 

  • Hassell MP, May RM (1974) Aggregation in predators and insect parasites and its effect on stability. J Anim Ecol 43:567–594

    Google Scholar 

  • Hassell MP, May RM (1986) Generalist and specialist natural enemies in insect predator-prey interactions. J Anim Ecol 55:923–940

    Google Scholar 

  • Hassell MP, May RM (1988) Spatial heterogeneity and the dynamics of parasitoid-host systems. Ann Zool Fenn 25:55–61

    Google Scholar 

  • Hassell MP, Southwood TRE, Reader PM (1987) The dynamics of the virburnum whitefly (Aleurotrachelus jelinekhii (Fraunf.)): a case study on population regulation. J Anim Ecol 56:283–300

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawton JH, McNeill S (1979) Between the devil and the deep blue sea: on the problem of being a herbivore. In: Anderson RM, Turner BD, Taylor LR (eds.) Population dynamics. Symposium of the British Ecological Society, 20, pp. 223–244

  • Lessells CM (1985) Parasitoid foraging: should parasitism be density dependent? J Anim Ecol 54:27–41

    Google Scholar 

  • Murdoch WW (1977) Stabilizing effects of spatial heterogeneity in predator-prey systems. Theor Pop Biol 11:252–273

    Google Scholar 

  • Murdoch WW, Oaten A (1975) Predation and population stability. Adv Ecol Res 9:1–131

    Google Scholar 

  • Shorrocks B, Rosewell J (1986) Guild size in drosophila: a simulation model. J Anim Ecol 55:527–542

    Google Scholar 

  • Stiling PD (1987) The frequency of density dependence in insect host-parasitoid systems. Ecology 68:844–856

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor LR, Woiwod IP, Perry JN (1979) The negative binomial as a dynamic ecological model for aggregation, and the density dependence of k. J Anim Ecol 48:289–304

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Latto, J., Hassell, M.P. Generalist predators and the importance of spatial density dependence. Oecologia 77, 375–377 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00378045

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00378045

Keywords

Navigation