Skip to main content
Log in

Subtypes of developmental dyslexia: The influence of definitional variables

  • Published:
Reading and Writing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to investigate the hypothesis that the manner in which a reading disability is defined will influence the conclusions that are made about the characteristics of the disability. To test this hypothesis, learning disabled and normally achieving children, aged 6 to 14, were administered tasks measuring grammatical, shortterm memory, phonological, reading, and visual-spatial skills. The poor readers were divided into groups of poor readers with

  1. 1.

    inadequate phonics skills,

  2. 2.

    inadequate word recognition skills,

  3. 3.

    adequate word recognition skills but low reading comprehension scores, and

  4. 4.

    adequate word recognition scores but a slow reading speed.

These children were compared with children who had normal reading scores. Children with deficits in phonics and/or word recognition scored significantly below normal on all the cognitive tests, except some of the visual-spatial tasks. Reading comprehension difficulties were characterized by average phonics, word recognition, and language skills but below average scores on some memory tasks. Slow readers had cognitive profiles similar to the normal children. The presence of a deficit in phonics and/or word recognition constituted the basis of the most serious impairment of language and memory functioning. Reading disabled children, defined in this manner, appear to be reasonably homogeneous in regard to the presence of language and memory problem. There does not appear to be evidence for a distinctive non-language impaired subtype within this type of reading disability. Children with low comprehension scores and/or slow readers did not have language problems. The definition of a reading disability appears to determine the subtypes and characteristics of reading disability that will emerge.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Baron, J. 1979. Orthographic and word specific mechanism in children's reading of words. Child Development, 50, 60–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barsky, V. and Siegel, L. S. 1987. The speed factor and WISC-R Performance IQ: Effects on subtypes of learning disabled children. Unpublished manuscript.

  • Boder, E. 1973. Developmental dyslexia: A diagnostic approach based on three atypical reading-spelling patterns. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 15, 663–687.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boder, E. and Jarrico, S. 1982. Boder Test of Reading-Spelling Patterns. Orlando, Fla.: Grune & Stratton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Case, R., Kurland, D. M. and Goldberg, J. 1982. Operational efficiency of short-term memory span. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 33, 386–404.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daneman, M. and Carpenter, P. A. 1980. Individual differences in working memory and reading. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 19, 450–466.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doehring, D. G. and Hoshko, I. M. 1977. Classification of reading problems by Q-technique of factor analysis. Cortex, 13, 281–294.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doehring, D. C., Hoshko, I. M. and Bryans, B. N. 1979. Statistical classification of children with reading problems. Journal of Clinical Neuropsychology, 1, 5–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doehring, D. G., Trites, R. L., Patel, P. G. and Fiedorowicz, C. A. M. 1981. Reading disabilities: The interaction of reading, language, and neuropsychological deficits. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drum, P. A., Calfee, R. C. and Cook, L. K. 1981. The effects of sentence structure variables on performance in reading comprehension tests. Reading Research Quarterly, 16, 486–514.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunn, L. 1965. Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test. Circle Pines, Minn.: American Guidance Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunn, L. M. and Markwardt, F. C. 1970. Peabody Individual Achievement Test. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisk, J. L. and Rourke, B. P. 1979. Identification of subtypes of learning-disabled children at three age levels: A neuropsychological, multivariate approach. Journal of Clinical Neuropsychology, 1, 289–310.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fletcher, J. M. 1985. Memory for verbal and nonverbal stimuli in learning disability subgroups: Analysis by selective reminding. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 40, 244–259.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fletcher, J. M. and Morris, R. 1986. Classification of disabled learners: Beyond exclusionary definitions. In S. J., Ceci (ed.), Handbook of cognitive, social and neuropsychological aspects of learning disabilities Vol. 1 (pp. 55–80). Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gates, A. I. and McKillop, A. S. 1962. Gates-McKillop Reading Diagnostic Tests. New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilmore, J. V. and Gilmore, E. C. 1968. Gilmore Oral Reading Test. New York: Harcourt, Brace, Jovanovich.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldman, R., Fristoe, M. and Woodcock, R. W. 1974. GFW Sound-Symbol Test. Circle Pines, Minesota: American Guidance Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Golick, M. 1977. Language disorders in children: A linguistic investigation. Unpublished doctoral disseration. McGill University, Montreal.

  • Jastak, J. R. and Jastak, S. R. 1978. Wide Range Achievement Test. Wilmington, Delaware: Jastak Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirk, S. A., McCarthy, J. J. and Kirk, W. D. 1968. Illinois Tests of Psycholinguistic Ability. Urbana, Illinois: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lovett, M. W. 1984. A developmental perspective on reading dysfunction: Accuracy and rate criteria for the subtyping of dyslexic children. Brain and Language, 22, 67–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyon, R., Stewart, N. and Freedman, D. 1982. Neuropsychological characteristics of empirically derived subgroups of learning disabled readers. Journal of Clinical Neuropsychology, 4, 343–365.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malatesha, R. N. and Dougan, D. R. 1982. Clinical subtypes of developmental dyslexia: Resolution of an irresolute problem. In R. N., Malatesha and P. G., Aaron (eds), Reading disorders: Varieties and treatment (pp. 69–92). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mattis, S. 1978. Dyslexia syndromes: A working hypothesis that works. In A. L., Benton and D., Pearl (eds), Dyslexia: An appraisal of current knowledge (pp. 69–112). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mattis, S., French, J. H. and Rapin, I. 1975. Dyslexia in children and young adults. Three independent neuropsychological syndromes. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 17, 150–163.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitterer, J. O. 1982. There are at least two kinds of poor readers: Whole word poor readers and recoding poor readers. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 36, 445–461.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nockleby, D. M. and Galbraith, A. A. 1984. Developmental dyslexia subtypes and the Boder Test of Reading-Spelling Patterns. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 2, 91–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson, R., Kliegl, R., Davidson, B. J. and Folz, G. 1985. Individual and developmental differences in reading disability. In T. G., Waller (ed.), Reading research: Advances in theory and practice, Vol. 4 (pp. 1–63). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ozols, E. J. and Rourke, B. P. 1985. Dimensions of social sensitivity in two types of learning disabled children. In B. P., Rourke (ed.), Neuropsychology of learning disabilities: Essentials of subtype analysis (pp. 281–301). New York: The Guildord Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petrauskas, R. J. and Rourke, B. P. 1979. Identification of subgroups of retarded readers: A neuropsychological multivariate approach. Journal of Clinical Neuropsychology, 1, 17–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pirozzolo, F. J., Dunn, K. and Zetusky, W. 1983. Physiological approaches to subtypes of developmental reading disability. Topics in Learning and Learning Disabilities, 3, 40–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rourke, B. P. and Finlayson, M. A. J. 1978. Neuropsychological significance of variations on patterns of academic performance: Verbal and visual-spatial abilities. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 6, 121–133.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rourke, B. P. and Strang, J. D. 1978. Neuropsychological significance of variations in patterns of academic performance: Motor, psychomotor, and tactile-perceptual abilities. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 3, 62–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rourke, B. P. and Strang, J. D. 1983. Subtypes of reading and arithmetic disabilities: A neuropsychological analysis. In M., Rutter (ed.), Developmental Neuropsychiatry (pp. 473–488). New York: The Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sattler, J. M. 1982. Assessment of children's intelligence and special abilities, Second edition. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shankweiler, D., Liberman, I. Y., Mark, L. S., Fowler, C. A. and Fischer, F. W. 1979. The speech code and learning to read. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 5, 531–545.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siegel, L. S. 1984. On the adequacy of the Wide Range Achievement Test (WRAT): A reply to Snart, Dennis, and Brailsford. Canadian Psychology, 25, 73–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siegel, L. S. 1985. Psycholinguistic aspects of reading disabilities. In L. S., Siegel and F. J., Morrison (eds), Cognitive development in atypical children (pp. 45–66). New York: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siegel, L. S. (1988). Evidence that IQ scores are irrelevant to the definition and analysis of reading disability. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 42, 201–215.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siegel, L. S. and Heaven, R. 1986. Defining and categorizing learning disabilities. In S., Ceci (ed.), Handbook of cognitive, social and neuropsychological aspects of learning disabilities: Vol. 1 (pp. 95–122). Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siegel, L. S., Levey, P. and Ferris, H. 1985. Subtypes of developmental dyslexia: Do they exist? In F. J., Morrison (ed.), Applied Developmental Psychology: Vol 2 (pp. 169–189). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siegel, L. S. and Linder, B. A. 1984. Short-term memory processes in children with reading and arithmetic learning disabilities. Developmental Psychology, 20, 200–207.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siegel, L. S. and Ryan, E. B. 1984. Reading disability as a language disorder. Remedial and Special Education, 5, 28–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siegel, L. S. and Ryan, E. B. (1988). The development of grammatical sensitivity and phonological skills in normally achieving and learning disabled children. Developmental Psychology, 24, 28–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Telzrow, C. F., Century, E., Whitaker, B., Redmond, C. and Zimmerman, B. 1983. The Boder Test: Neuropsychological and demographic features of dyslexic subtypes. Psychology in the Schools, 20, 427–432.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van den, Bos, K. P. 1984. Letter processing in dyslexic subgroups. Annals of Dyslexia, 34, 179–193.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vellutino, F. R. 1978. Toward an understanding of dyslexia: Psychological factors in specific reading disability. In A. L., Benton and D., Pearl (eds), Dyslexia: An appraisal of current knowledge (pp. 61–112). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vellutino, F. R. 1979. Dyslexia: Theory and research. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wechsler, D. 1974. Manual for the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children—Revised. New York: Psychological Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willows, D. M. and Ryan, E. B. 1986. The development of grammatical sensitivity and its relation to early reading achievement. Reading Research Quarterly, 21, 253–266.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodcock, R. W. 1973. Woodcock Reading Mastery Tests. Circle Pines, Minn.: American Guidance Service.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Requests for reprints should be addressed to the first author at the Department of Special Education, Ontario Institute for Studies in Education, 252 Bloor Street West, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5S 1V6. This research was supported by a grant to the first author from the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada. The authors wish to thank Rita Baumgarten, Andrea Blore, Lisa Duval, Jacqueline Milne, and Barbara Szechtman for their help with the data collection and analyses, and Letty Guirnela for secretarial assistance. The authors also wish to thank Mr. J. Grosso of the Hamilton-Wentworth Roman Catholic Separate School Board. Mr. J. Hughes of Regina Mundi School, Mr. C. D'Arcy of St. Jerome's School, Mr. M. B. Wansbrough, Miss M. Robertson, and Mrs. J. Parry of Hillfield-Strathallan College, and the teachers, children, and parents for their gracious cooperation with the study.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Siegel, L.S., Ryan, E.B. Subtypes of developmental dyslexia: The influence of definitional variables. Read Writ 1, 257–287 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00377646

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00377646

Keywords

Navigation