Skip to main content
Log in

Cluster analytic classification of reading disability subtypes

  • Published:
Reading and Writing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Cluster analysis was employed to identify subtypes of reading disability in a sample of 140 reading-disabled children using factor scores obtained from a battery of psychometric tests. Preliminary results suggested the existence of three subtypes, but closer scrutiny of the data indicated that individual differences are more accurately characterized by continuity in the measurement space. This result demonstrates the need for detailed validation of findings from applications of cluster analysis. Despite the absence of homogeneous subtypes, the characterization of individual strengths and weaknesses on psychometric measures may nonetheless be important for diagnosis and remediation in the educational setting.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderberg M. R. 1973. Cluster analysis for applications. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Decker S. N. and DeFries J. C. 1981. Cognitive ability profiles in families of reading-disabled children. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 23, 217–227.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doehring D. G. and Hoshko I. M. 1977. Classification of reading problems by the Q-technique of factor analysis. Cortex, 13, 281–294.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doehring D. G., Hoshko I. M., and Bryans B. N. 1979. Statistical classification of children with reading problems. Journal of Clinical Neuropsychology, 1, 5–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doehring D. G., Trites R. L., Patel P. G., and Fiedorowicz C. A. M. 1981. Reading disabilities: The interaction of reading, language, and neuropsychological deficits. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunn L. M. and Markwardt F. C. 1970. Examiner's Manual: Peabody Individual Achievement Test. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Everitt B. 1980. Cluster analysis (2nd ed.). London: Heinemann Educational Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisk J. L. and Rourke B. P. 1979. Identification of subtypes of learning-disabled children at three age levels: A neuropsychological, multivariate approach. Journal of Clinical Neuropsychology, 1, 289–310.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fleiss J. L., Lawlor W., Platman S. R., and Fieve R. R. 1971. On the use of inverted factor analysis of generating typologies. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 77, 127–132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fleiss J. L. and Zubin J. 1969. On the methods and theory of clustering. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 4, 235–250.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fletcher J. M. and Morris R. 1986. Classification of disabled learners: Beyond exclusionary definitions. In S. Ceci (Ed.), Handbook of cognitive, social, and neuropsychological aspects of learning disabilities. New York: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • French J. W., Ekstrom R. G., and Price L. A. 1963. Manual for a kit of reference tests for cognitive factors. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gengerelli J. A. 1963. A method for detecting subgroups in a population and specifying their membership. Journal of Psychology, 55, 457–468.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huizinga D. H. 1978. EXAMIN: A nutural density or mode-seeking clustering algorithm (Tech. Rep. No. 78-1). Boulder, CO: Behavioral Research Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huizinga D. H. and Brennan T. 1976. K-Means: A K-Means clustering program with identification of outliers and merging of clusters (Tech. Rep. No. 76-A). Boulder, CO: Behavioral Research Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kavale K. A. and Forness S. R. 1987. The far side of heterogeneity: A critical analysis of empirical subtyping research in learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 20, 374–382.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyon R. G. 1982. Subgroups of learning disabled readers: Clinical and empirical identification. In H. R. Myklebust (Ed.), Progress in learning disabilities (Vol. 5). New York: Grune and Stratton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyon R. G., Reitta S., Watson B., Porch B., and Rhodes J. 1981. Selected linguistic and perceptual abilities of empirically derived subgroups of learning disabled readers. Journal of School Psychology, 19, 152–166.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyon R. G. and Watson B. 1981. Empirically derived subgroups of learning disabled readers. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 14, 256–261.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malatesha R. N. and Dougan D. R. 1982. Clinical subtypes of developmental dyslexia: Resolution of an irresolute problem. In R. N. Malatesha and P. G. Aaron (Eds.), Reading disorders: Varieties and treatments. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKinney J. D. 1984. The search for subtypes of specific learning disability. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 17, 43–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morris R., Blashfield R., and Satz P. 1981. Neuropsychology and cluster analysis: Potentials and problems. Journal of Clinical Neuropsychology, 3, 79–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Naidoo S. 1972. Specific dyslexia. New York: Pitman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nie N. H., Hull C. H., Jenkins J. G., Steinbrenner K., and Bent D. H. 1975. Statistical package for the social sciences (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petrauskas R. J. and Rourke B. P. 1979. Identification of subtypes of retarded readers: A neuropsychological multivariate approach. Journal of Clinical Neuropsychology, 1, 17–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rourke B. P. (Ed.). 1985. Neuropsychology of learning disabilities: Essentials of subtype analysis. New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Satz P., and Morris R. 1981. Learning disability subtypes: A review. In F. J. Pirozzolo and M. C. Wittrock (Eds.), Neuropsychological and cognitive processes in reading. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Science Research Associates, Inc. 1965. Primary Mental Abilities. Chicago: Author.

  • Ward J. H., Jr. 1963. Hierarchical grouping to optimize an objective function. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 58, 236–244.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson B. U., Goldgar D. E., and Ryschon K. L. 1983. Subtypes of reading disability. Journal of Clinical Neuropsychology, 5, 377–399.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wechsler D. 1974. Examiner's Manual: Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-Revised. New York: The Psychological Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Behavioral Research Institute

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Vogler, G.P., Baker, L.A., Decker, S.N. et al. Cluster analytic classification of reading disability subtypes. Read Writ 1, 163–177 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00377469

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00377469

Keywords

Navigation