Skip to main content
Log in

The effects of cooperative homework on mathematics achievement of Chinese high school students

  • Published:
Educational Studies in Mathematics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study examined the effects of cooperative homework on mathematics achievement, taking into account team characteristics. Results of analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) showed that three-member teams high in ability (three high achievers or two high achievers plus one middle/low achiever) seem preferable in organizing cooperative learning for mathematics homework. Middle and low achievers all benefited from cooperative mathematics homework, whereas high achievers did not although they still maintained their top position in mathematics achievement.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • ChambersB. and AbramiP. C.: 1991, ‘The relationship between student team learning outcomes and achievement, causal attributions, and affect’, Journal of Educational Psychology 83, 140–146.

    Google Scholar 

  • CohenJ. and CohenP.: 1983, Applied Multiple Regression/Correlation Analysis in Behavioral Sciences. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • DavidsonN. and KrollD. L.: 1991, ‘An overview of research on cooperative learning related to mathematics’, Journal for Research in Mathematics Education 22, 362–365.

    Google Scholar 

  • JohnsonD. W., MaruyamaG., JohnsonR. T., NelsonD. and SkonL.: 1981, ‘Effects of cooperative, competitive, and individualistic goal structures on achievement: A meta-analysis’, Psychological Bulletin 89, 47–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • PedhazurE. J.: 1982, Multiple Regression in Behavioral Research: Explanation and Prediction. Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • SharanS.: 1980, ‘Cooperative learning in small groups: Recent methods and effects on achievement, attitudes, and ethnic relations’, Review of Educational Research 10, 241–271.

    Google Scholar 

  • SharanS. (Ed.): 1990, Cooperative Learning: Theory and Research. Praeger, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • SlavinR. E.: 1980, ‘Cooperative learning’, Review of Educational Research 50, 315–342.

    Google Scholar 

  • SlavinR. E.: 1983a, Cooperative Learning, Longman, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • SlavinR. E.: 1983b, ‘When does cooperative learning increase student achievement?’ Psychological Bulletin 94, 429–445.

    Google Scholar 

  • SlavinR. E.: 1985, ‘An introduction to cooperative learning research’. In R.Slavin, S.Sharan, S.Kagan, R.Hertz-Lazarowitz, C.Webb and R.Schmuch (Eds.), Learning to cooperate, cooperate to learn (pp. 5–15). Plenum, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • StevensR. J., SlavinR. E. and FarnishA. M.: 1991, ‘The effects of cooperative learning and direct instruction in reading comprehension strategies on main idea identification’. Journal of Educational Psychology 83, 8–16.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ma, X. The effects of cooperative homework on mathematics achievement of Chinese high school students. Educational Studies in Mathematics 31, 379–387 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00369155

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00369155

Keywords

Navigation