Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Magnetic resonance imaging: Comparison of four pulse sequences in assessing primary bone tumours

  • Articles
  • Published:
Skeletal Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A prospective magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) study was carried out in 13 patients (19 examinations) with primary bone tumours to assess the relative value of each of four pulse sequences in showing the extent and nature of the lesion. The four pulse sequences used were a T1-weighted spin-echo (SE544/44), a T2-weighted spin echo (SE1500/80), a short TI inversion recovery (STIR) (IR500/100/44), and a partial saturation (PS) (PS500/22) with field echo data collection. For soft tissue disease the combination of PS and STIR gave better definition of the boundary of the tumour than the more conventional T1 and T2-weighted spin echo sequences. For the demonstration of bone cortex, periosteal change and calcification, T1 and T2-weighted spin echo sequences were better. However, for calcified tissues, plain radiographs were better than either MRI combination. On the assumption that plain films will be available in all cases, PS and STIR sequences could therefore be substituted for T1 and T2-weighted spin echo sequences allowing an increase in soft tissue detectability for lesions in both red and yellow marrow.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bloem JL, Bluemm RG, Taminiau AHM, van Oosterom AT, Stolk J, Doornbos J (1987) Magnetic resonance imaging of primary malignant bone tumors. Radiographics 7:425

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bohndorf K, Reiser M, Lochner B, Feaux de Lacroix W, Steinbrich W (1986) Magnetic resonance of primary tumours and tumour like lesions of bone. Skeletal Radiol 15:511

    Google Scholar 

  3. Boyko OB, Cory DA, Cohen MD, Provisor A, Mirkin D, De Rosa GP (1987) MR imaging of osteogenic and Ewing's sarcoma. AJR 148:317

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bydder GM, Young IR (1985) Clinical use of the partial saturation and saturation recovery sequences in MR imaging. J Comput Assist Tomogr 9:1020

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bydder GM, Young IR (1985) MR Imaging: Clinical use of the inversion recovery sequence. J Comput Assist Tomogr 9:659

    Google Scholar 

  6. Brady TJ, Wismer GL, Buxton R, Stark DD, Rosen BR (1986) Magnetic resonance chemical shift imaging. In: Kressel HY (ed) Magnetic resonance annual, 6th edn. Raven Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  7. Brady TJ, Rosen BR, Pykett IL, McGuire MH, Mankin HJ, Rosenthal DI (1983) NMR imaging of leg tumors. Radiology 149:181

    Google Scholar 

  8. Cohen MD, Klatte EC, Baehner R, Smith JA, Martin Simmerman P, Carr BE, Provisor AJ, Weetman RM, Coates T, Seddiqui A, Weisman SJ, McKenna S, McGuire WA (1984) Magnetic resonance imaging of bone marrow diseases in children. Radiology 151:715

    Google Scholar 

  9. Cristy M (1981) Active bone marrow distribution as a function of age in humans. Phys Med Biol 26:389

    Google Scholar 

  10. Dooms GC, Fisher MR, Hricak H, Richardson M, Crooks LE, Genant HK (1985) Bone marrow imaging: magnetic resonance studies related to age and sex. Radiology 155:429

    Google Scholar 

  11. Matthaei D, Frahm J, Haase A, Merboldt KD, Hanicke W (1986) Multipurpose NMR imaging using stimulated echoes. Mag Res Med 3:554

    Google Scholar 

  12. Hartsock RJ, Smith EB, Petty CS (1965) Normal variations with aging of the amount of hematopoietic tissue in bone marrow from the anterior iliac crest. Am J Clin Pathol 3:326

    Google Scholar 

  13. Hudson TM, Hamlin DJ, Enneking WF, Pettersson H (1985) Magnetic resonance imaging of bone and soft tissue tumors. Early experience in 31 patients compared with computed tomography. Skeletal Radiol 13:134

    Google Scholar 

  14. Kangarloo H, Dietrich RB, Taira RT, Gold RH, Lenarsky C, Ines Boechat IM, Feig SA, Salusky I (1986) MR imaging of bone marrow in children. J Comput Assist Tomogr 10:205

    Google Scholar 

  15. Kricun ME (1985) Red-yellow marrow conversion: Its effect on the location of some solitary bone lesions. Skeletal Radiol 14:10

    Google Scholar 

  16. Levin DN, Herrmann A, Spraggins T, Collins PA, Dixon LB, Simon MA, Stillmann A, (1983) Musculoskeletal tumours: Improved depiction with linear combinations of MR images. Radiology 163:545

    Google Scholar 

  17. Moon KL, Davis PL, Kaufman L, Crooks LE, Sheldon PE, Miller T, Brito AC, Watts JC (1983) Nuclear magnetic resonance imaging of fibrosarcoma tumour implanted in the rat. Radiology 148:177

    Google Scholar 

  18. Porter BA, Olson DO, Stimac GK, Shields AF, Nelson SJ (1987) STIR imaging of marrow malignancies. Abstract in Sixth Annual meeting of the Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, vol 1, p 146

    Google Scholar 

  19. Pettersson H, Hamlin DJ, Mancuso A, Scott KN (1985) Magnetic resonance imaging of the musculoskeletal system. Acta Radiol [Diagn] (Stockh) 26:225

    Google Scholar 

  20. Richardson ML, Amparo EG, Gillespy T, Helms CA, Demas BE, Genant HK (1985) Theoretical considerations for optimizing intensity differences between primary musculoskeletal tumors and normal tissue with spin echo magnetic resonance imaging. Invest Radiol 20:492

    Google Scholar 

  21. Sundaram M, McGuire MH, Herbold DR (1987) Magnetic resonance imaging of osteosarcoma. Skeletal Radiol 16:23

    Google Scholar 

  22. Yoshida H, Asai S, Yashiro N, Iio M (1985) MR1 of bone marrow. Radiat Med 3:47

    Google Scholar 

  23. Wismer GL, Rosen BR, Buxton R, Stark DD, Brady TJ (1985) Chemical shift imaging of bone marrow: Preliminary experience. AJR 145:1031

    Google Scholar 

  24. Zimmer WD, Berquist TH, McLeod RA, Sim FH, Pritchard DJ, Shives TC, Wold LE, May GR (1985) Bone tumors: Magnetic resonance imaging versus computed tomography. Radiology 155:709

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Graif, M., Pennock, J.M., Pringle, J. et al. Magnetic resonance imaging: Comparison of four pulse sequences in assessing primary bone tumours. Skeletal Radiol 18, 439–444 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00368612

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00368612

Key words

Navigation