Abstract
In this paper I attempt a new approach to an old technical term: ‘becoming’. I show how the theory that becoming is coming-to-be could be supported by a semantic derivation of the nominalization ‘becoming’ from its verbal counterpart, by investigating the properties of the present progressive constructions in which ‘becoming’ as a verbal appears. My theory denies that dates, or qualitative change, play an essential role in the analysis of becoming.
Similar content being viewed by others
Bibliography
Broad, Charlie Dunbar, Examination of McTaggart's Philosophy, Cambridge, University Press, 1938.
Geach, P.T., ‘Some Problems About Time’, Proceedings of the British Academy, Vol. LI (1965).
Grünbaum, Adolf, ‘The Meaning of Time’, In Freeman and Sellars, (eds.), Basic Issues in the Philosophy of Time, Lasalle, 1971.
McCall, Storrs, ‘Time and the Physical Modalities’, In Freeman and Sellars, op. cit.
McCall, Storrs, ‘Objective Time Flow’, Unpublished ms.
McTaggart, John McTaggart Ellis, The Nature of Existence, Cambridge, University Press, 1927.
McTaggart, John McTaggart Ellis, ‘The Unreality of Time’, Mind XVII (1908).
Rankin, K.W., ‘Past and Future: a Revision of Reichenbach's Indeterministic Distinction’. Philosophical Quarterly, 1967.
Reichenbach, Hans, The Direction of Time, Berkeley, U.C. Press, 1956.
Russell, B., ‘On the Experience of Time’, Monist XXV (1915).
Taylor, Richard, Metaphysics, Englewood Cliffs, Prentice-Hall, 1963.
Thomason, Richard, ‘Indeterminist Time and Truth-Value Caps’, Theoria, 1970.
Whitehead, A.N., Process and Reality, New York, macmillan, 1929.
Whitrow, G.J., The Natural Philosophy of Time, London, Thomas Nelson and Sons, 1961.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
McGilvray, J.A. Becoming: A modest proposal. Philosophical Studies 30, 161–170 (1976). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00355272
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00355272