Skip to main content
Log in

Variable-complexity response surface approximations for wing structural weight in HSCT design

  • Originals
  • Published:
Computational Mechanics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A procedure for generating and using a polynomial approximation to wing bending material weight of a High Speed Civil Transport (HSCT) is presented. Response surface methodology is used to fit a quadratic polynomial to data gathered from a series of structural optimizations. Several techniques are employed in order to minimize the number of required structural optimizations and to maintain accuracy. First, another weight function based on statistical data is used to identify a suitable model function for the response surface. In a similar manner, geometric and loading parameters that are likely to appear in the response surface model are also identified. Next, simple analysis techniques are used to find regions of the design space where reasonable HSCT designs could occur. The use of intervening variables along with analysis of variance reduce the number of polynomial terms in the response surface model function. Structural optimization is then performed by the program GENESIS on a 28-node Intel Paragon. Finally, optimizations of the HSCT are completed both with and without the response surface.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barthelemy, J. F. M.; Wrenn, G. A.; Dovi, A. R.; Coen, P. G.; Hall, L. E.: Supersonic Transport Wing Minimum Weight Design Integrating Aerodynamics and Structures, J. of Aircraft, Vol. 31, No. 2, March–April 1994, pp. 330–338

    Google Scholar 

  • Box, G. E. P.; Behnken, D. W.: Some New Three Level Designs for the Study of Quantitative Variables, Technometrics, Vol. 2, No. 4, November, 1960, pp. 455–475

    Google Scholar 

  • Box, M. J.; Draper, N. R.: Factorial Designs, the |XTX| Criterion, and Some Related Matters, Technometrics, Vol. 13, No. 4, 1971, pp. 731–742

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlson, H. W.; Walkley, K. B.: Numerical Methods and a Computer Program for Subsonic and Supersonic Design and Analysis of Wings with Attainable Thrust Considerations, NASA CP 3808, 1984

  • Dudley, J.; Huang, X.; Haftka, R. T.; Grossman, B.; Mason, W. H.: Variable-Complexity Interlacing of Weight Equation and Structural Optimization for the Design of the High Speed Civil Transport, AIAA Paper 94-4377, 1994

  • Dudley, J.; Huang, X.; MacMillin, P. E.; Grossman, B.; Haftka, R. T.; Mason, W. H.: Multidisciplinary Optimization of the High-Speed Civil Transport, AIAA Paper 95-0124, 1995

  • Giunta, A. A.; Dudley, J. M.; Narducci, R.; Grossman, B.; Haftka, R. T.; Mason, W. H.; Watson, L. T.: Noisy Aerodynamic Response and Smooth Approximations in HSCT Design, AIAA Paper 94-4376, 1994

  • Grandhi, R. V.; Thareja, R.; Haftka, R. T.; NEWSUMT-A: A General Purpose Program for Constrained Optimization Using Approximation, ASME J. Mechanisms, Transmissions and Automation in Design, Vol. 107, 1985, pp. 94–99

    Google Scholar 

  • Hinkelman, Klaus; Kempthorne, Oscar: Design and analysis of experiments, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 1994, pp. 297–299

  • Huang, X.: Structural Optimization and its Interaction with Aerodynamic Optimization for a High Speed Civil Transport, Ph.D. Dissertation, VPI & SU, November 1994

  • Huang, X.; Haftka, R. T.; Grossman, B.; Mason, W.: Comparison of Statistical-based Weight Equations with Structural Optimization for Supersonic Transport Wings, AIAA Paper 94-4379, 1994

  • Hutchison, M. G.: Multidisciplinary Optimization of High-Speed Civil Transport Configurations Using Variable Complexity Modeling, Ph.D. Dissertation, VPI & SU, March 1993

  • Hutchison, M. G.; Huang, X.; Mason, W. H.; Haftka, R. T.; Grossman, B.: Variable-Complexity Aerodynamic-Structural Design of a High-Speed Civil Transport Wing, AIAA Paper 92-4695, 4th AIAA/USAF/NASA/OAI Symposium on Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization, Cleveland, OH, Sept. 21–23, 1992

  • Hutchison, M. G.; Unger, E. R.; Mason, W. H.; Grossman, B.; Haftka, R. T.: Aerodynamic Optimization of an HSCT Wing Using Variable-Complexity Modeling, Paper AIAA 93-0101, Jan. 1993

  • Hutchison, M. G.; Unger, E. R.; Mason, W. H.; Grossman, B.; Haftka, R. T.: Variable Complexity Aerodynamic-Structural Design of a High Speed Civil Transport Wing, AIAA Paper 92-4695, Sept. 1992

  • Hutchison, M. G.; Unger, E. R.; Mason, W. H.; Grossman, B.; Haftka, R. T.: Variable-Complexity Aerodynamic Optimization of an HSCT Wing Using Structural Wing-Weight Equations, J. Aircraft, Vol. 31, No. 1, 1994, pp. 110–116

    Google Scholar 

  • Khuri, A. I.; Cornell, J. A.: Response Surfaces: Designs and Analyses, Marcel Dekker, New York, NY, 1987

    Google Scholar 

  • Malone, B.; Woyak, S. A.: An Object-Oriented Analysis and Optimization Control Environment for the Conceptual Design of Aircraft, AIAA Paper 95-3862, 1st AIAA Aircraft Engineering, Technology, and Operations Congress, Los Angeles, CA, Sept. 19–21, 1995

  • Mason, R. L.; Gunst, R. F.; Hess, J. L.: Statistical Design and Analysis of Experiments, John Wiley & Sons, New York, N. Y., 1989, pp. 215–221

    Google Scholar 

  • McCullers, L. A.: Aircraft Configuration Optimization Including Optimized Flight Profiles, Proceedings of a Symposium on Recent Experiences in Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization, J. Sobieski, compiler, NASA Cp-2327, April 1984, pp. 395–412

  • Myers, R. H.; Montgomery, D. C.: Response Surface Methodology: Process and Product Optimization Using Designed Experiments, John Wiley & Sons, New York, N. Y., 1995, pp. 650–651

    Google Scholar 

  • Unger, E. R.; Hutchison, M. G.; Rais-Rohani, M.; Haftka, R. T.; Grossman, B.: Variable-Complexity Design of a Transport Wing, Intl. J. Systems Automation: Res. and Appl. (SARA), No. 2, 1992, pp. 87–113

  • Vanderplaats, Miura and Associates.: Inc., GENESIS User Manual, Version 1.3, Dec. 1993

  • Woyak, Scott A.; Malone, B.; and Myklebust, A.: An Architecture for Creating Engineering Applications: The Dynamic Integration System, Proceedings of the Computers in Engineering Conference and the Engineering Database Symposium, ASME, Sept. 17–20, 1995, Boston, MA, pp. 1–8

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Communicated by S. N. Atluri, 23 January 1996

Dedicated to the 10th anniversary of Computational Mechanics

This work was supported by NASA Grants NAG-1-1562 and NAG-1-1160.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kaufman, M., Balabanov, V., Giunta, A.A. et al. Variable-complexity response surface approximations for wing structural weight in HSCT design. Computational Mechanics 18, 112–126 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00350530

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00350530

Keywords

Navigation