Skip to main content
Log in

Different effects of variation in Xanthium strumarium L. (Compositae) on two insect seed predators

  • Published:
Oecologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

To determine the relative importance of variation in several plant characters on susceptibility to herbivores, we examined patterns of seed predation by two monophagous insect species and patterns of variation in ten populations of the cocklebur, Xanthium strumarium. Multiple regression analysis disclosed that one seed predator was most influenced by plant chemical variation, the other was significantly influenced by both chemical and morphological variation, but variation in yet another character, general burr size, was most important in conferring resistance to both insects simultaneously. The plant populations differed most in this character. Although many of the plant characters were correlated with each other, those important in determining susceptibility to each insect species were uncorrelated and independent of those conferring resistance to both insects simultaneously.

These results imply that ecological similar herbivores may be influenced by different aspects of plant variation, and that predictions of evolutionary responses of local plant populations to herbivory may require knowledge of the structure of local herbivore communities and the dynamics of their establishment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Breedlove, D.E., Ehrlich, P.R.: Plant-herbivore coevolution: Lupines and lycaenids. Science 162, 671–672 (1968)

    Google Scholar 

  • Breedlove, D.E., Ehrlich, P.R.: Coevolution: Patterns of legume predation by a lycaenid butterfly. Oecologia 10, 99–104 (1972)

    Google Scholar 

  • DaCosta, C.P., Jones, C.M.: Cucumber beetle resistance and mite susceptibility controlled by the bitter gene in Cucumus sativus. Science 172, 1145–1146 (1971)

    Google Scholar 

  • Dethier, V.G.: Evolution of feeding preferences in phytophagous insects. Evolution 8, 33–54 (1954)

    Google Scholar 

  • Dolinger, P.M., Ehrlich, P.R., Fitch, W.L., Breedlove, D.E.: Alkaloid and predation patterns in Colorado lupine populations. Oecologia (Berl.) 13, 191–204 (1973)

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehrlich, P.R., Raven, P.H.: Butterflies and plants: a study in coevolution. Evolution 18, 586–608 (1964)

    Google Scholar 

  • Erickson, J., Feeny, P.: Sinigrin: a chemical barrier to the black swallowtail butterfly, Papilio polyxenes. Ecology 55, 103–111 (1974)

    Google Scholar 

  • Feeny, P.: Plant apparency and chemical defense. Recent Adv. Phytochem. 10, 1–40 (1976)

    Google Scholar 

  • Futuyma, D.J.: Food plant specialization and environmental predictibility in lepidoptera. Am. Nat. 110, 285–292 (1976)

    Google Scholar 

  • Futuyma, D.J., Gould, F.: Associations of plants and insects in a deciduous forest. Ecology (in press)

  • Green, T.W., Palmblad, I.G.: Effects of insect seed predators on Astragalus cibarius and Astragalus utahensis (Leguminosae). Ecology 56, 1435–1440 (1975)

    Google Scholar 

  • Hare, J.D.: The biology of Phaneta imbridana (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae), a seed predator of Xanthium strumarium (Compositae). Psyche 84, 179–182 (1977)

    Google Scholar 

  • Hare, J.D.: Variation and seed predation among local populations of Xanthium strumarium L., Ph.D. Thesis, State University of New York at Stony Brook (1978)

  • Janzen, D.H.: Seed predation by animals. Ann. Rev. Ecol. & Syst. 2, 465–492 (1971)

    Google Scholar 

  • Janzen, D.H.: Behavior of Hymenaea courbaril when its predispersal seed predator is absent. Science 189, 145–147 (1975a)

    Google Scholar 

  • Janzen, D.H.: Intra- and interhabitat variation in Guazuma ulmifolia (Sterculaceae) seed predation by Amblycerus cistelinus (Bruchidae) in Costa Rica. Ecology 56, 1009–1013 (1975b)

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, S.G.: The control of Noogoora and Bathurst burr by insects. J.Coun. Sci. Indus. Res. Aust. 4, 161–172 (1931)

    Google Scholar 

  • Kingsbury, J.M.: Poisonous plants of the United States and Canada. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall 1964

    Google Scholar 

  • Löve, D., Dansereau, P.: Biosystematic studies on Xanthium: Taxonomic appraisal and ecological status. Can. J. Bot. 37, 173–208 (1959)

    Google Scholar 

  • Maxwell, F.G., Jenkens, J.N., Parrott, W.L.: Resistance of plants to insects. Adv. Agron. 24, 187–265 (1972)

    Google Scholar 

  • Nie, N.H., Hull, C.N., Jenkens, J.C., Steinbrenner, K., Bent, D.J.: SPSS: Statistical package for the social sciences, 2nd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill 1975

    Google Scholar 

  • Rhoades, D.F., Cates, R.G.: A general theory of plant antiherbivore chemistry. Recent Adv. Phytochem. 10, 168–213 (1976)

    Google Scholar 

  • Sokal, R.R., Rohlf, F.J.: Biometry: the principle and practice of statistics in biological research. San Francisco: Freeman 1969

    Google Scholar 

  • Wasbauer, M.S.: An annotated host catalog of the fruit flies of America north of Mexico (Diptera: Tephritidae). Calif. Dept. Agric., Bull. Entomol. Occas. Papers #19 (1972)

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hare, J.D., Futuyma, D.J. Different effects of variation in Xanthium strumarium L. (Compositae) on two insect seed predators. Oecologia 37, 109–120 (1978). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00349997

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00349997

Keywords

Navigation