Skip to main content
Log in

Toward the physiological analysis of defensive responses of scorpions

  • Published:
Zeitschrift für vergleichende Physiologie Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

  1. 1.

    The response of many scorpions to a light touch is a vigorous convergence of the sting and the pedipalps towards the stimulated point (defensive strike response). They respond to a puff of air by pulling the pedipalps in towards the mouth, erecting the tail and scuttling backwards (defensive withdrawal). Response times of 20 to 150 msec have been measured for these two reflexes.

  2. 2.

    The defensive strike appears to be initiated by small receptors scattered over the surface of the legs and other parts of the body, and not by conspicuous structures such as long hairs and lyriform organs, nor by any variety of joint receptor.

  3. 3.

    Lesions in the cephalothoracic mass can unilaterally abolish the defensive strike while sparing locomotory and leg withdrawal movements. Sectioning one of the two connectives immediately behind the c.t.m. has no effect.

  4. 4.

    The strike pathway is characterized by strong resistance to habituation, graded response, and (at least in one species) longitudinal lability indicated by independent movement of the tail and pedipalps. Thus, in spite of its rapidity, the defensive strike does not closely resemble the evasive responses of the cockroach and earthworm.

  5. 5.

    Bilateral stimulation elicits a symmetrical response. Other attempts to modify the response, for example by altering or disrupting the proprioceptive input, have failed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature

  • Alexander, A. J.: On the stridulation of scorpions. Behaviour 12, 339–352 (1958).

    Google Scholar 

  • Babu, K. S.: Anatomy of the central nervous system of arachnids. Zool. Jb. Anat. 82, 1–154 (1965).

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisner, T.: Defense mechanisms of arthropods. II. The chemical and mechanical weapons of an earwig. Psyche 67, 62–70 (1960).

    Google Scholar 

  • —, J. Meinwald, A. Monro, and R. Ghent: Defense mechanisms of arthropods. I. The composition and function of the spray of the whipscorpion, Mastigoproctus giganteus (Lucas) (Arachnida, Pedipalpida). J. Insect Physiol. 6, 272–298 (1961).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanström, B.: Zur Kenntnis des zentralen Nervensystems der Arachnoiden und Pantopoden. Inaug. Diss., Lund. Aktiebologet Skånska 1919.

  • —: Further notes on the central nervous system of arachnids: scorpions, phalangids and trap-door spiders. J. comp. Neurol. 35, 249–274 (1923).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanström, B.: Vergleichende Anatomie des Nervensystems der wirbellosen Tiere unter Berücksichtigung seiner Funktion. Berlin: Springer 1928.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffmann, C.: Die Trichobothrien der Skorpione. Naturwissenschaften 52, 436–437 (1965).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy, D., W. H. Evoy, and J. T. Hanawalt: Release of coordinated behavior in crayfish by single central neurons. Science 154, 917–919 (1966).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuenzer, P.: Verhaltensphysiologische Untersuchungen über das Zucken des Regenwurms. Z. Tierpsychol. 15, 31–49 (1958).

    Google Scholar 

  • Markl, H., and M. Lindauer: Physiology of insect behavior. In M. Rookstein (ed.), The physiology of insecta, vol. II, p. 3–122. New York and London: Academic Press 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  • Millot, J., and M. Vachon: Ordre des scorpions. In P. P. Grassé (ed.), Traité de Zoologie, vol. VI, p. 386–436. Paris: Masson & Cie. 1949.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palka, J., and J. A. L. Cooke: In preparation.

  • Roberts, M. B. V.: The giant fibre reflex of the earthworm, Lumbricus terrestris L. II. Fatigue. J. exp. Biol. 39, 229–238 (1962).

    Google Scholar 

  • Roeder, K. D.: Organization of the ascending giant fiber system in the cockroach (Periplaneta americana L.). J. exp. Zool. 108, 243–262 (1948).

    Google Scholar 

  • Schöne, H.: Complex behavior. In T. H. Waterman (ed.), The Physiology of Crustacea, vol. II, p. 465–520. New York: Academic Press 1961.

    Google Scholar 

  • Selvarajan, V. R.: Thesis, Department of Zoology, Sri Venkateswara University, Tirupati (A.P.), India 1966.

    Google Scholar 

  • Venkateswararao, P.: Thesis, Department of Zoology, Sri Venkateswara University, Tirupati (A.P.), India 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiersma, C. A. G., and K. Ikeda: Interneurons commanding swimmeret movements in the crayfish Procambarus clarki (Girard). Comp. Biochem. Physiol. 12. 509–525 (1964).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

This work was performed while one of us (J. P.) was a Fulbright Lecturer at Sri Venkateswara University. Dr. R. P. S. Reddy, Museum National d'Histoire Naturelle, Paris, kindly identified the species used in these experiments. We are grateful to T. H. Bullock, J. A. L. Cooke, G. A. Horridge and especially D. C. Sandeman for critical reading of the manuscript.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Palka, J., Babu, K.S. Toward the physiological analysis of defensive responses of scorpions. Zeitschrift für vergleichende Physiologie 55, 286–298 (1967). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00349604

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00349604

Keywords

Navigation