Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The role of chemotactile stimuli in the oviposition preferences of Colias butterflies

  • Published:
Oecologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

The legume foodplants of Colias butterflies possess specific chemical components which stimulate oviposition in females of the genus. Different legumes provide different degrees of stimulation, as demonstrated by close correlation between field observations and laboratory experiments with a new behavioral assay. Several generalizations emerge from this study. 1) Chemical preferences for various foodplants are under genetic control in C. meadii, and are at least partly independent of an individual's previous exposure to different legumes. 2) In some cases, chemical cues alone do not allow females to discriminate between species. Long-range search cues may be used to enhance discrimination in such instances. 3) Lupinus, a legume which is not usually utilized by Colias, stimulates oviposition in the laboratory, indicating its chemical affinity with other Leguminosae. The behavioral assay described should prove useful for the future identification of specific oviposition stimulants and deterrents. It is stressed, however, that chemotactile cues are involved only in the final step of oviposition, and that understanding foodplant choice in nature will require in-depth investigation into the mechanics of individual search processes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barrell, J.: Flora of the Gunnison Basin; Gunnison, Saguache, and Hinsdale Counties, Colorado. Rockford, Ill.: Natural land Inst. 1969

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell, E.A.: Comparative biochemistry of non-protein amino acids. In: Chemotaxonomy of the Leguminosae (J.B. Harborne and B.L. Turner, eds.), New York: Academic Press 1971

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, F.M.: Colorado butterflies, Proceedings of the Denver Museum of Natural history. Denver, Colorado. 368 p. 1957

  • Charnov, E.L.: Optimal foraging: attack strategy of a mantid. Amer. Natur. 110, 141–151 (1976)

    Google Scholar 

  • Chew, F.S.: Coevolution of Pierid butterflies and their cruciferous foodplants. II. The distribution of eggs on potential foodplants. Evolution 31, 568–579 (1977)

    Google Scholar 

  • Cody, M.L.: Optimization in ecology. Science 183, 1156–1164 (1974)

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook, R.M., Hubbard, S.F.: Adaptive searching strategies in insect parasites. J. Anim. Ecol. 46, 115–125 (1977)

    Google Scholar 

  • David, W.A.L. and Gardiner, B.O.C.: Oviposition and the hatching of eggs of Pieris brassicae (L.) in a laboratory culture. Bull. Entomol. Res. 53, 91–109 (1962)

    Google Scholar 

  • DeBoer, G., Dethier, V.G., Schoonhoven, L.M.: Chemoreceptors in the preoral cavity of the tobacco hornworm Manduca sexia, and their possible function in feeding behavior. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 21, 287–298 (1977)

    Google Scholar 

  • Dethier, V.G.: Chemical factors determining the choice of foodplants in Papilio larvae. Amer. Natur. 75, 61–73 (1941)

    Google Scholar 

  • Dethier, V.G.: Evolution of feeding preferences in phytophagous insects. Evolution 8, 33–54 (1954)

    Google Scholar 

  • Dethier, V.G.: Chemical interactions between plants and insects. In: Chemical ecology (E. Sondheimer and J.B. Simeone, eds.), pp. 83–102. New York: Academic Press 1970

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehrlich, P.R., Ehrlich, A.H.: How to know the butterflies. Dubuque, Iowa: W.C. Brown Co. 1961

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehrlich, P.R., Raven, PH: Butterflies and plants: A study in coevolution. Evolution 18, 586–608 (1965)

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, S.L.: Field observations on Colias alexandra Edwards (Pieridae). J. Lepid. Soc. 28, 114–125 (1973)

    Google Scholar 

  • Feeny, P.P.: Biochemical coevolution between plants and their insect herbivores. In: Coevolution of animals and plants (L.E. Gilbert and P.H. Raven, eds.), pp. 3–19. Austin: Univ. of Texas Press 1975

    Google Scholar 

  • Feeny, P.P.: Plant apparency and chemical defense. In: Recent Advances in Biochemistry. Vol. 10, Biochemical interaction between plants and insects (J.W. Wallace and R.L. Mansell, eds.), pp. 1–40. New York-London: Plenum Press 1976

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraenkel, G.: Evaluation of our thoughts on secondary plant substances. Entomol. Exp. App. 12, 473–486 (1969)

    Google Scholar 

  • Futuyma, D.J.: Food plant specialization and environmental predictability in Lepidoptera. Amer. Natur. 110, 285–292 (1976)

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, L.E.: Ecological consequences of a coevolved mutualism between butterflies and plants. In: Coevolution of animals and plants (L.E. Gilbert and P.H. Raven, eds.), pp. 210–240. Austin: Univ. of Texas Press 1975

    Google Scholar 

  • Gupta, P.D., thorsteinson, A.J.: Food plant relationships of the Diamond Backed moth (Plutella maculipennis) II. Sensory regulation of oviposition in the adult female. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 3, 305–314 (1960)

    Google Scholar 

  • Harborne, J.B.: Phytochemical methods; a guide to modern techniques of plant analysis. London: Chapman and Hall 1973

    Google Scholar 

  • Harborne, J.B., Boulter, D.L., Turner, B.L. (eds.): Chemotaxanomy of the Leguminosae. New York: Academic Press 1971

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrington, H.D.: Manual of the plants of Colorado, second edition. Chicago: Sage Books 1964

    Google Scholar 

  • Hopkins, H.D.: A discussion of C.G. Hewett's paper on insect behavior. J. Econ. Entomol. 10, 92–93 (1917)

    Google Scholar 

  • Hovanitz, W.: The biology of Colias butterflies. I. The distribution of the North American species. Wasmann J. Biol. 8, 49–74 (1950)

    Google Scholar 

  • Hovanitz, W., Chang, V.C.S.: Adult oviposition responses in Pieris rapae. J. Res. Lepid 3, 159–172 (1964)

    Google Scholar 

  • Isle, D.: New observations on responses to colors in egg-laying butterflies. Nature 140, 544–545 (1937)

    Google Scholar 

  • Klots, A.B.: A field guide to the butterflies; East of the Great Plains. Boston: Houghton and Mifflin Co. 1951

    Google Scholar 

  • Levins, R., MacArthur, R.H.: An hypothesis to explain the incidence of monophagy. Ecology 50, 910–911 (1969)

    Google Scholar 

  • Lundgren, L.: Natural plant chemicals acting as oviposition deterrents on cabbage butterflies (Pieris brassicae L. and P. rapae L.). Zoologica Scripta 4, 253–258 (1975)

    Google Scholar 

  • Ma, W.C., Kubo, I.: Phagostimulants for Spodoptera exempta: Identification of adenosine from Zea mays. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 22, 107–112 (1977)

    Google Scholar 

  • Marten, G.: An optimization equation for predation. Ecology 54, 92–101 (1973)

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, N.D.: Differential host selection by Pieris brassicae on Brassica oleracea subsp. oleracea (the wild cabbage). Entomol. Exp. Appl. 22, 208–219 (1977)

    Google Scholar 

  • Myers, J.: The distribution of foodplant chemoreceptors on the female Florida Queen butterfly Danaus glippus (Nymphalidae). J. Lepid. Soc. 23, 196–198 (1969)

    Google Scholar 

  • Pecket, R.C.: The constituents of leaf extracts in the genus Lathyrus. New Phytol. 58, 182–187 (1960)

    Google Scholar 

  • Pulliam, H.R.: On the theory of optimal diets. Amer. Natur. 108, 59–74 (1973)

    Google Scholar 

  • Pyke, G.: Are animals efficient harvesters? Animal Behaviour, in press (1978)

  • Rauscher, M.D.: Search image for leaf shape in a butterfly. Science 200, 1071–1073 (1978)

    Google Scholar 

  • Remington, C.L.: The biology of some nearctic lepidopteran larvae. I. Foodplants and life histories of Colorado Papilionidae. Psyche 59, 61–69 (1952)

    Google Scholar 

  • Rhoades, D.F., Cates, R.G.: Toward a general theory of plant antiherbivore chemistry. In: Recent Advances in Phytochemistry, Vol. 10, Biochemical interaction between plants and insects (J.W. Wallace and R.L. Mansell, eds.), pp. 168–213. New York: Plenum Press 1976

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothschild, M.E.: Secondary plant substances and warning coloration. In: Insect/plant realtionships (H.F. van Emden, ed.), pp. 59–83. Oxford: Blackwell Scientific Publications 1973

    Google Scholar 

  • Saxena, K.N., Prahba, S.: Relationship between the olfactory sensilla of Papilio demoleus L. larvae and their orientation responses to different odours. J. Entomol. (A), 50, 119–126 (1977)

    Google Scholar 

  • Saxena, K.N., Saxena, R.C.: Patterns of relationships between certain leafhoppers and plants, Part III. Range and interaction of sensory stimuli. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 18, 194–206 (1975a)

    Google Scholar 

  • Saxena, K.N., Saxena, R.C.: Patterns of relationships between certain leafhoppers and plants, Part IV. Sequence of stimuli determining arrival on plant. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 18, 207–212 (1975b)

    Google Scholar 

  • Schoonhoven, L.M.: Secondary plant substances and insects. In: Structural and functional aspects of phytochemistry. Recent Advances in Phytochemistry, Vol. 5 (V.C. Runeckles and T.C. Tso, eds.), pp. 197–224. London-New York: Academic Press 1972

    Google Scholar 

  • Sevastopuolo, D.G.: Lepidoptera ovipositing on plants toxic to larvae. J. Lepid. Soc. 18, 104 (1964)

    Google Scholar 

  • Sherman, P.W., Watt, W.B.: The thermal ecology of some Colias larvae. J. Comp. Physiol. 83, 25–40 (1973)

    Google Scholar 

  • Singer, M.C.: Evolution of foodplant preference in the butterfly Euphydryas editha. Evolution 25, 383–389 (1971)

    Google Scholar 

  • Sokal, R.R., Rohlf, F.J.: Biometry. San Francisco: Freeman 1969

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanton, M.L.: The mechanisms and evolutionary origins of oviposition selectivity in Colias butterflies. Undergraduate honors thesis. Stanford University 1975

  • Takata, N.: Studies on the host preference of the common cabbage butterfly Pieris rapae crucivora (Bdv.) XI. Continued studies on the oviposition preference of adult butterflies. Jap. J. Ecol. 14, 124–133 (1961)

    Google Scholar 

  • Vaidya, V.G.: On the phenomenon of drumming in egg-laying female butterflies. J. Bombay Nat. Hist. Soc. 54, 216–217 (1956)

    Google Scholar 

  • Watt, W.B., Chew, F.S., Snyder, L.R.G., Watt, A., Rothschild, D.E.: Population structure of pierid butterflies. I. Numbers and movements of some Colias species. Oecologia (Berl.) 27, 1–22 (1977)

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiklund, C.: Oviposition preferences of Papilio machaon in relation to the host plants of the larvae. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 17, 189–198 (1974)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Author notes

  1. Maureen L. Stanton

    Present address: The Biological Laboratories, Harvard University, 16 Divinity Avenue, 02138, Cambridge, Mass, USA

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Biology, Organismal and Evolutionary Biology Division, Harvard University, USA

    Maureen L. Stanton

  2. The Rocky Mountain Biological Laboratory Crested Butte, Colorado, USA

    Maureen L. Stanton

Authors
  1. Maureen L. Stanton
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Stanton, M.L. The role of chemotactile stimuli in the oviposition preferences of Colias butterflies. Oecologia 39, 79–91 (1979). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00345999

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00345999

Keywords

Search

Navigation