Skip to main content
Log in

Trends in arthropod defensive secretions, an aquatic predator assay

  • Published:
Oecologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Twenty-five arthropod defensive chemicals were tested on a potential fish predator to assay basic repellency, interniche effectiveness and mimetic interactions among repellents, and predator tolerance to repellents.

The defensive secretions of aquatic arthropods are more effective repellents than those of terrestrial or cryptozoic arthropods. Phenolic compounds are more effective than carbonylic or acidic compounds. Repellency is most effective in compounds of reduced water solubility. Repeated exposure to gradually increasing molar concentrations of benzoic acid resulted in a greater acceptability of this compound to fish predators. It is suggested that Mullerian mimicry systems based on large numbers of species may be susceptible to dilution effects in terms of effectiveness.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Blum, M. S.: The chemical basis of insect sociality. In: Chemicals controlling insect behaviour, M. Beroza, ed. New York: Academic Press 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  • Calam, D. H., Youdeowei, A.: Identification and functions of secretion from the posterior scent gland of fifth instar larvae of the bug Dysdercus intermedius. J. Insect Physiol. 14, 1147–1158 (1968).

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisner, H. E., Alsop, D. W., Eisner, T.: Defensive mechanisms of arthropods. XX. Quantitative assessment of hydrogen cyanide production in two species of millipedes. Psyche 74, 107–117 (1967).

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisner, T.: Chemical defense against predation in arthropods. In: Chemical ecology, E. Sondheimer, J. B. Simeone, Eds. New York: Academic Press 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisner, T., Meinwald, J.: Defensive secretions of arthropods. Science 153, 1341–1350 (1966).

    Google Scholar 

  • Handbook of chemistry and physics, 45th edition. Cleveland: Chemical Rubber 1964.

  • Jacobson, M.: Chemical insect attractants and repellents. Ann. Rev. Entomol. 11, 403–422 (1966).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rettenmeyer, C. W.: Insect mimicry. Ann. Rev. Entomol. 15, 43–74 (1970).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothschild, M., Kellett, D. N.: Reactions of various predators to insects storing heart poisons (cardiac glycosides) in their tissues. J. Entomol., Ser. A. 46, 103–110 (1972).

    Google Scholar 

  • Schildknecht, H., Siewerdt, R., Maschwitz, U.: A vertebrate hormone as a defensive substance of the water beetle (Dytiscus marginalis). Angew. Chem. Intern. (English edition) 5, 421 (1966).

    Google Scholar 

  • Waterhouse, D. F., Gilby, A. R.: The adult scent glands and scent of nine gugs of the superfamily Coreiodidea. J. Insect Physiol. 10, 977–987 (1964).

    Google Scholar 

  • Weatherston, J., Percy, J. E.: Arthropod defensive secretions. In: Chemicals controlling insect behaviour, M. Beroza, Ed. New York: Academic Press 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, E. O.: Chemical communication within animal species. In: Chemical ecology, E. Sondheimer, J. B. Simeone, Eds. New York: Academic Press 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, E. O., Bossert, W. H.: Chemical communication among animals. Recent Progr. Hormone Res. 19, 673–716 (1963).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hepburn, H.R., Berman, N.J., Jacobson, H.J. et al. Trends in arthropod defensive secretions, an aquatic predator assay. Oecologia 12, 373–382 (1973). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00345049

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00345049

Keywords

Navigation