Skip to main content
Log in

Iohexol compared to Urografin Meglumine in cerebral angiography

A randomized, double blind cross-over study

  • Originals
  • Published:
Neuroradiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

In a double blin cross-over study the non ionic, water soluble contrast medium iohexol has been compared to Urografin Meglumine by angiography in common carotid artery and vertebral artery. More subjective adverse effects were generally seen with Urografin than with iohexol and statistically there were significantly less changes in heart rate after iohexol but no significant changes in the intra-arterial recorded blood pressure.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Lindgren E (ed) (1980) Iohexol. A non-ionic contrast medium. Acta Radiol [Suppl] (Stockh) 362

  2. Nakstad P, Sortland O, Aaserud O, Lundervold A (1982) Cerebral angiography with the non-ionic, water soluble contrast medium Iohexol and Meglumine-Ca-metrizoate. A randomized, double blind, parallel study in man. Neuroradiology 23:199–202

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ahlgren, P. Iohexol compared to Urografin Meglumine in cerebral angiography. Neuroradiology 23, 195–198 (1982). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00342539

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00342539

Key words

Navigation