Skip to main content
Log in

Interspecific competitive interactions between pairs of fungal species in natural substrates

  • Original Papers
  • Published:
Oecologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The role of interspecific competition in fungal communities in natural substrates is poorly understood because fungi do not form easily definable populations. A new approach to investigating fungal competition, using natural substrates containing a range of known biomass concentrations of each of two species, is described. Relative competitive success of each species is assessed over time in terms of propagule production and substrate colonisation by each species. In an agricultural soil Mucor hiemalis usually out-competed Trichoderma harzianum. After 27 days, the success of both species in the mixtures was independent of the initial biomass concentration of either species, although the success of T. harzianum in these mixtures was substantially inhibited relative to the T. harzianum monocultures. In a forest soil, T. polysporum maintained a competitive advantage over M. hiemalis, and induced M. hiemalis to produce propagules rather than mycelia. Coexistence of both species always occurred in both experiments, and in the forest soil experiment the two-species mixtures all contained a higher total microbial biomass than the monocultures of either species by day 47, suggesting some niche differentiation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Antonovics J, Fowler NL (1985) Analysis of frequency and density effects on growth in mixtures of Salvia splendens and Linum grandiflora using hexagonal designs. J Ecol 73: 219–234

    Google Scholar 

  • Bissett J, Widden P (1972) An automatic multi-chamber soil moisture apparatus for removing fungal spores from soil. Can J Microbiol 18: 1399–1409

    Google Scholar 

  • Brame C, Flood J (1983) Antagonism of Aureobasidium pullulans towards Alternaria solani. Trans Br Mycol Soc 81: 621–624

    Google Scholar 

  • Canada Soil Survey Committee (1978) The Canadian system of soil classification. Research Branch, Canadian Department of Agriculture Publication 1646

  • Chand T, Logan C (1984) Antagonists and parasites of Rhizoctonia solani and their efficacy in reducing stem canker of potato under controlled conditions. Trans Br Mycol Soc 83: 107–112

    Google Scholar 

  • Connell JH (1983) On the prevalence and relative importance of interspecific competition: evidence from field experiments. Am Nat 122: 661–696

    Google Scholar 

  • Connolly J (1987) On the use of response models in mixture experiments. Oecologia 72: 95–103

    Google Scholar 

  • Connolly J (1988) What is wrong with replacement series? Trends Ecol Evol 3: 24–26

    Google Scholar 

  • De Wit CT (1960) On competition. Versl Landbouwk Onderz 66: 1–82

    Google Scholar 

  • Domsch KH, Gams W, Anderson T-H (1980) Compendium of soil fungi. Academic Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Firbank LG, Watkinson AR (1985) On the analysis of competition within two-species mixtures of plants. J Appl Ecol 22: 503–517

    Google Scholar 

  • Fravel DR (1988) Role of antibiosis in the biocontrol of plant diseases. Ann Rev Phytopathol 26: 75–91

    Google Scholar 

  • Garrett SD (1963) Soil fungi and soil fertility. Permagon Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Garrett SD (1965) Cellulose-decomposing ability of some cereal root-rot fungi in relation to their saprophytic ability. Trans Br Mycol Soc 49: 57–68

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerson U, Chet I (1981) Are allochthonous and autochthonous soil micro-organisms r- and k-selected? Rev Ecol Biol Sol 18: 285–289

    Google Scholar 

  • Inouye RS, Schaffer WM (1981) On the ecological meaning of ratio (de Wit) diagrams in plant ecology. Ecology 62: 1679–1681

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenkinson DS (1988) Determination of microbial biomass carbon and nitrogen in soil. In: Wilson JB (ed) Advances in nitrogen cycling. C.A.B. International, Wallingford, pp 368–386

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenkinson DS, Powlson DS (1976) The effects of biocidal treatments on metabolism in soil. V. A method for measuring soil biomass. Soil Biol Biochem 8: 204–213

    Google Scholar 

  • Keddy PA (1989) Competition. Chapman and Hall, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Law R, Watkinson AR (1987) Response-surface analysis of two-species competition: an experiment on Phleum arenarium and Vulpia fasciculata. J Ecol 75: 871–886

    Google Scholar 

  • Machin D, Sanderson B (1977) Computing maximum-likelihood estimates for the parameters of the de Wit competition model. Appl Statist 26: 1–8

    Google Scholar 

  • National Algorithms Group (1988) GENSTAT 5 Reference Manual. National Algorithms Group, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson EB, Kutter GA, Hoitink HAJ (1983) Effects of fungal antagonists and compost age on suppression of Rhizoctonia damping-off in container media amended with hardwood bark. Phytopathol 73: 1458–1462

    Google Scholar 

  • Papavizas GC (1985) Trichoderma and Gliocladium: biology, ecology, and potential for biocontrol. Annu Rev Phytopathol 23: 23–54

    Google Scholar 

  • Parkinson D (1981) Ecology of soil fungi. In: Coles GT, Kendric B (eds) Biology of fungi. Vol. 1. Academic Press, London, pp 277–294

    Google Scholar 

  • Parkinson D, Gray TRG, Williams ST (1971) Methods for studying the ecology of soil micro-organisms. Black well, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Prescott CE, Corbin JP, Parkinson D (1989) Biomass, productivity, and nutrient-use efficiency of aboveground vegetation in four Rocky Mountain coniferous forests. Can J For Res 19: 309–317

    Google Scholar 

  • Rai B, Upadhyay RS (1983) Competitive saprophytic colonisation of pigeon-pea substrate by Fusarium udum in relation to environmental factors, chemical treatments and microbial antagonism. Soil Biol Biochem 15: 187–191

    Google Scholar 

  • Schoener TW (1974) Resource partitioning in ecological communities. Science 185: 27–39

    Google Scholar 

  • Schoener TW (1983) Field experiments on interspecific competition. Am Nat 122: 240–285

    Google Scholar 

  • Seifert RP (1981) Applications of a mycological data base to principles and concepts of population and community ecology. In: Wicklow DT, Carroll GC (eds). The fungal community its organisation and role in the ecosystem. Marcel Dekker, New York, pp 11–23

    Google Scholar 

  • Snaydon RW (1991) Replacement or additive designs for competition studies? J Appl Ecol 28: 930–946

    Google Scholar 

  • Snaydon RW, Satoore EH (1989) Bivariate diagrams for plant competition data: modifications and interpretation. J Appl Ecol 26: 1043–1057

    Google Scholar 

  • Tillekeratne LKD (1989) Some aspects of fungal roles in the decomposition of lodgepole pine and white spruce leaf litter. Dissertation, University of Calgary, Alberta, Canada.

  • Toth JA, Papp LB, Lenkey B (1975) Litter decomposition in an oakforest ecosystem (Quercetum petraeas cerris) of northern Hungary studied in the framework of the “Sikfokut Project”. In: Kilbertus G, Reisenger O, Mourney A, Cancela da Fonsca JA (eds). Biodegradation et humification. Nancy University, Pierron, pp 41–58

    Google Scholar 

  • Trenbath BR (1974) Biomass productivity of mixtures. Adv Agron 26: 177–210

    Google Scholar 

  • Wardle DA, Parkinson D (1990a) Influence of the herbicide glyphosate on soil microbial community structure. Plant Soil 122: 29–37

    Google Scholar 

  • Wardle DA, Parkinson D (1990b) Determination of bacterial and fungal fumigation k c factors across a soil moisture gradient. Soil Biol Biochem 22: 811–816

    Google Scholar 

  • Wardle DA, Parkinson D (1990c) Comparison of physiological techniques for estimating the response of the soil microbial biomass to soil moisture. Soil Biol Biochem 22: 817–823

    Google Scholar 

  • Wardle DA, Parkinson D (1990d) Interactions between microclimate variables and the soil microbial biomass. Biol Fertil Soil 9: 273–280

    Google Scholar 

  • Wardle DA, Parkinson D (1991) Analysis of co-occurrence in a fungal community. Mycol Res 95: 504–507

    Google Scholar 

  • Webber JF, Hedger JN (1986) Comparison of interactions between Ceratocystis ulmi and elm bark saprobes in vitro and in vivo. Trans Brit Mycol Soc 86: 93–101

    Google Scholar 

  • Whipps JM (1987) Effect of media on growth and interactions between a range of soil-borne glasshouse pathogens and antagonistic fungi. New Phytol 107: 127–142

    Google Scholar 

  • Widden P (1981) Patterns of phenology among fungal populations. In: Wicklow DT, Carroll GC (eds). The fungal community-its organisation and role in the ecosystem. Marcel Dekker, New York, pp 387–401

    Google Scholar 

  • Widden P (1984) The effects of temperature on competition for spruce needles among sympatric species of Trichoderma. Mycologia 76: 873–883

    Google Scholar 

  • Widden P, Hsu D (1987) Competition between Trichoderma species: effects of temperature and litter type. Soil Biol Biochem 19: 89–93

    Google Scholar 

  • Willey RW, Rao MR (1981) A systematic design to examine effects of plant population and spacial arrangement in intercropping, illustrated by an experiment on chickpea/safflower. Exp Agric 17: 63–73

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson JB (1988) Shoot competition and root competition. J Appl Ecol 25: 279–296

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright T (1981) The analysis of yield-density relationships in binary mixtures using inverse polynomials. J Agric Sci 96: 561–567

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wardle, D.A., Parkinson, D. & Waller, J.E. Interspecific competitive interactions between pairs of fungal species in natural substrates. Oecologia 94, 165–172 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00341313

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00341313

Key words

Navigation