Abstract
The receptive fields of “complex” neurons within area 18 of the cerebral cortex of the cat were determined by a computer-assisted method using a moving light bar substantially shorter than the long diameter of the receptive field as a visual stimulus. The visual cells repeatedly generated nerve impulses when the stimulus crossed well-defined “active points” within their receptive fields. Outside of these active points, the cells remained silent. It is suggested that the receptive fields are formed by a discontinuous accumulation of such active points. When the electrical activities of two neighbouring visual neurons are recorded simultaneously, their active points do not coincide. In addition, some active points were located outside the most prominent excitatory part of the receptive field of the studied cells. Individual visual cells typically differ in the number and distribution of active points. Since these cells best respond to a stimulus moving in a certain direction, it is suggested that they may act as direction of movement and/or velocity detectors. Alternate firing of a number of neighboring cells connected to a distributed pattern of peripheral receptors may form a system which is able to code for velocity and direction of the moving stimulus.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Albrecht DG, De Valois R, Thorell LG (1980) Visual cortical cells: are bars or gratings the optimal stimuli? Science 207:88–90
Berrux B, Echallier JF, Pernier J (1975) Systeme d'acquisition de champs recepteurs de neurones visuels. Int J Biomed Comput 6:231–240
Bishop PC, Coombs JS, Henry GH (1971) Interaction effects of visual contours on the discharge frequency of simple striate neurons. J Physiol (London) 219:659–687
De Valois KK, De Valois R, Yund EW (1979) Responses of striate cortex cells to grating and checkerboard patterns. J Physiol (London) 291:483–505
De Valois RL, Albrecht DG, Thorell LG (1982) Spatial frequency selectivity of cells in macaque visual cortex. Vision Res 22:549–559
Hubel DH, Wiesel TN (1962) Receptive fields, binocular interaction and functional architecture in the cat's visual cortex. J Physiol (London) 160:106–154
Hubel DH, Wiesel TN (1965) Receptive fields and function architecture in two nonstriate visual areas (18 and 19) of the cat. J Neurophysiol 28:229–289
Movshon JA (1975) The velocity tuning of single units in cat striate cortex. J Physiol (London) 249:445–468
Pettigrew JD, Nikara T, Bishop PO (1968) Responses to moving slits by single units in cat striate cortex. Exp Brain Res 6:373–390
Poggio T, Reichardt W (1973) Considerations on models of movement detection. Kybernetik 13:223–227
Pollen DA, Ronner SF (1975) Periodic excitability changes across the receptive fields of complex cells in the striate and parastriate cortex of the cat. J Physiol (London) 245:667–697
Reinis S, Weiss DS (1987) Mass correlograms of visually responsive neurons in cortical area 18 of the cat. Neuroscience 13:629 (abstr)
Reinis S, Landolt JP, Weiss DS (1985) Effects of nitrous oxide on the functional characteristics of cells in the extrastriate cortex of the cat. Exp Brain Res 59:463–469
Reinis S, Landolt JP, Money KE, Lahue RH, Weiss DS (1986) Effect of head tilt on visual cortical cell function in the intact and labyrithectomized cat. Exp Neurol 91:102–126
Spinelli DN, Barrett TW (1968) Visual receptive field organization of single units in the cat's visual cortex. Exp Neurol 24:76–98
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Reinis, S., Weiss, D.S. & Landolt, J.P. Lack of homogeneity of receptive fields of visual neurons in the cortical area 18 of the cat. Biol. Cybern. 59, 41–48 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00336889
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00336889