Skip to main content
Log in

Radiation induced asynaptic mutations in durum wheat (Triticum durum DESF.)

  • Published:
Chromosoma Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The cytological behaviour and the inheritance of two asynaptic mutations independently obtained by neutron treatment of durum wheat seeds of var. Cappelli and Aziziah are considered. Mutant individuals of both lines have normal morphology, but are completely sterile. Analysis of chromosome behaviour at the several stages of PMC meiosis has been thoroughly accomplished in mutant progenies of both varieties during two subsequent generations. A completely random chromosome disjunction was found at anaphase I, together with multipolar spindles, laggard chromosomes etc. At meiotic second division a large amount of abnormalities were found, as a consequence of previous asynapsis and irregular polarization. Some differences in cytological behaviour were found between the asynaptic mutants of Cappelli and the asynaptics of Aziziah. - Genetic analysis demonstrated that both mutations behave as monogenic recessives.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature

  • Beadle, G. W.: A gene for supernumerary mitoses during spore development in Zea mays. Science 70, 406–407 (1929); - Genetical and cytological studies of mendelian asinapsis in Zea mays. Mem. Cornell Univ. Agric. Exper. Station 129 (1930); - Genes in maize for pollen sterility. Genetics 17, 413–431 (1932a); - A gene in Zea mays for failure of cytokinesis during meiosis. Cytologia (Tokyo) 3, 142–155 (1932b); - Further studies of asynaptic maize. Cytologia (Tokyo) 4, 269–289 (1933a); - Polymitotic maize and the precocity hypothesis of chromosome conjugation. Cytologia (Tokyo) 5, 118–121 (1933b).

    Google Scholar 

  • Beasley, J. O., and M. S. Brown: Asynaptic Gossypium plants and their polyploids. J. agric. Res. 65, 421–427 (1942).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bergner, A. D., J. L. Cartledge, and A. F. Blakeslee: Chromosome behaviour due to a gene which prevents metaphase pairing in Datura. Cytologia (Tokyo) 6, 19–37 (1935).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bozzini, A.: Mutanti chromosomici indotti da radiazioni ionizzanti in grano duro ≫Cappelli≪. Atti Assoc. genet. Italiana 6, 365–370 (1961).

    Google Scholar 

  • -, and G. Martini: Fertility of interchange heterozygotes in Triticum durum Dese. Caryologia (Firenze) (1966) (in press).

  • Catcheside, D. G.: An asynaptic Oenothera. New Phytologist 38, 324–334 (1939).

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, F. J.: Cytogenetic studies of divergent meiotic spindle formation in Zea mays. Amer. J. Bot. 27, 547–559 (1940).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehrenberg, C. E.: Studies on asynapsis in the elm, Ulmus glabra Huds. Hereditas (Lund) 35, 1–26 (1949).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ekstrand, H.: Ein neuer Fall von erblicher Asyndese bei Hordeum. Svensk bot. T. 26, 292–301 (1932).

    Google Scholar 

  • Enns, H., and E. R. Larter: Note on the inheritance of ds.; a gene governing meiotic chromosome behaviour in barley. Canad. J. Plant Sci. 40, 569–571 (1960).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gottschalk, W., and A. Jahn: Cytogenetical investigations on desynaptic and male-sterile mutants of Pisum. Z. Vererbungsl. 95, 150–166 (1964).

    Google Scholar 

  • —, and R. V. Villalobos-Pietrini: The influence of mutant genes on chiasmata formation in Pisum sativum. Cytologia (Tokyo) 30, 88–97 (1965).

    Google Scholar 

  • Huskins, G. L., and E. M. Hearne: Meiosis in asynaptic dwarf oats and wheat. J. roy. micr. Soc. 53, 109–117 (1933).

    Google Scholar 

  • Khoshoo, J. N.: Cytology of conifers III. Partial failure of meiotic spindle in Cephalotaxus drupacea var. pedunculata. Cytologia (Tokyo) 22, 80–89 (1957).

    Google Scholar 

  • Koller, P. C.: Asynapsis in Pisum sativum. J. Genet. 36, 275–306 (1938).

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, H. W., W. K. Pao, and C. H. Li: Desynapsis in the common wheat. Amer. J. Bot. 32, 92–101 (1945).

    Google Scholar 

  • Malik, C. P., and Sl. L. Tandon: Meiotic abnormalities and failure of spindle mechanism in Suaeda fruticosa Forsk. Caryologia (Firenze) 13, 516–524 (1960).

    Google Scholar 

  • Martini, G.: Analisi meiotica di mutanti vitali radioindotti in frumento duro Cappelli. Genet. agrar. 18, 174–182 (1964); - Risultati dell'analisi meiotica di mutanti vitali di frumento duro indotti da mutageni fisici e chimici. Caryologia (Firenze) (1966) (in press).

    Google Scholar 

  • —, e A. Bozzini: Analisi di un mutante “sticky” indotto da radiazioni in frumento duro Cappelli. Genet. agrar. 19, 184–194 (1965).

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller jr., O. L.: Cytological studies in asynaptic maize. Genetics 48, 1445–1466 (1963).

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan jr., D. T.: Asynapsis and plasmodial microsporocytes in maize following X-irradiation of the pollen. J. Hered. 47, 269–274 (1956); - Asynapsis in Pepper following X-irradiation of the pollen. Cytologia (Tokyo) 28, 102–107 (1963).

    Google Scholar 

  • Morrison, J. W.: Chromosome behaviour in wheat monosomics. Heredity 7, 203–217 (1953).

    Google Scholar 

  • Okamoto, M.: Asynaptic effect of chromosome V. Wheat Inform Service 5, 6 (1957); - Mutation of a gene (or genes) for asynapsis and its use in plant breeding. Wheat Inform. Service 15/16, 43–44 (1963).

    Google Scholar 

  • Prakken, R.: Studies of asynapsis in rye. Hereditas (Lund) 29, 475–495 (1943).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramanujam, S., and N. Parthasarathy: Asynaptic mutant in rice (Oryza sativa, L.). Proc. Indian Acad. Sci. 2, 80 (1935).

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, M. M.: Meiosis in Crepis. II. Failure of pairing in Crepis capillaris (L.) Vallr. J. Genet. 31, 119–143 (1935).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rieger, R., u. A. Michaelis: Genetisches und cytogenetisches Wörterbuch. Berlin-Göttingen-Heidelberg: Springer 1958.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riley, R.: Chromosome pairing and haploids in wheat. Proc. 10th Intern. Gen. Congr., Montreal 2, 234–235 (1958).

    Google Scholar 

  • Scarascia-Mugnozza, G. T., and A. Bozzini: Inheritance studies in durum wheat. 4th Eucarpia Congress, Lund (in press, 1965).

  • Sears, E. R.: Misdivision of univalents in common wheat. Chromosoma (Berl.) 4, 535–550 (1952).

    Google Scholar 

  • —, and M. Okamoto: Intergenomic chromosome relationship in hexaploid wheat. Proc. 10th Intern. Gen. Congr., Montreal 2, 258–259 (1958); - Genetic and structural relationships of non-homologous chromosomes in wheat. Cytologia (Tokyo). Proc. of the Intern. Genet. Symposium, 332–335 (1956).

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, L.: Cytogenetic studies in Triticum monococcum L. and T. Aegilopoides Bal. Univ. Missouri Agr. Exp. Sta. Res. Bull. 248, 1–38 (1936).

    Google Scholar 

  • Soost, R. K.: Comparative cytology and genetics of asynaptic mutants in Lycopersicon esculentum Mill. Genetics 36, 410–434 (1951).

    Google Scholar 

  • Yamamoto, Y.: Reifungssteilungen bei einer asynaptischen Pflanze von Rumex acetosa. Bot. and Zool. 2, 1160–1168 (1934).

    Google Scholar 

  • Vaamara, A.: Spindle abnormalities and variation in chromosome number in Ribes nigrum. Hereditas (Lund) 35, 136–162 (1949).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Contribution No. 139 from the Laboratory for the Application of nuclear energy to Agriculture, Casaccia Nuclear Studies Centre, Roma, Italy. - Part of the investigation was supported by Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche (Gruppo di lavoro per il miglioramento genetico delle piante erbacee e cultivate, Sottogruppo per il grano duro).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Martini, G., Bozzini, A. Radiation induced asynaptic mutations in durum wheat (Triticum durum DESF.). Chromosoma 20, 251–266 (1966). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00335211

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00335211

Keywords

Navigation