Skip to main content
Log in

Chromosome micromanipulation

I. The mechanics of chromosome attachment to the spindle

  • Published:
Chromosoma Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The attachment of individual chromosomes to the spindle has been studied by micromanipulation in functionally normal grasshopper spermatocytes. Prometaphase to anaphase I chromosomes can be repeatedly stretched with a microneedle without much increase in the distance between the kinetochores and the poles. Individual chromosomes can, however, be displaced laterally (prometaphase-anaphase) or toward the pole (anaphase) without loss of spindle attachment and without greatly disturbing other chromosomes. It is concluded that chromosomes are firmly and individually attached to the spindle by chromosomal spindle fibers which are capable of bearing any normal mitotic load, including the stretching of dikinetic (dicentric) chromosomes in anaphase. Prolonged or severe manipulation can produce a small — three or four micron — increase in the kinetochore-to-pole distance. Anaphase motion continues normally in spite of lateral or poleward displacements or of small increases in the kinetochore-to-pole distance. In late anaphase, chromosomes can be displaced to the opposite pole. An unusual, rapid motion back toward the original pole follows such displacements, but repeated displacements eventually result in non-disjunction. No evidence for firm interzonal connections between anaphase chromosomes was obtained. Prometaphase and metaphase bivalents can be detached from the spindle by manipulations other than bivalent stretching, but half-bivalents in anaphase are never detached by these manipulations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bajer, A.: Observations on dicentrics in living cells. Chromosoma (Berl.) 14, 18–30 (1963); - Ciné-micrographic studies on dicentric chromosomes. Chromosoma (Berl.) 15, 630–651 (1964).

    Google Scholar 

  • —, and R. D. Allen: Structure and organization of the living mitotic spindle of Haemanthus endosperm. Science 151, 572–574 (1966).

    Google Scholar 

  • Behnke, O., and A. Forer: Some aspects of microtubules in spermatocyte meiosis in a crane fly (Nephrotoma suturalis Loew): intranuclear and intrachromosomal microtubules. C. R. Trav. Lab. Carlsberg 35, 437–455 (1966).

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlson, J. G.: Microdissection studies of the dividing neuroblast of the grasshopper, Chortophaga viridifasciata (De Geer). Chromosoma (Berl.) 5, 199–220 (1952).

    Google Scholar 

  • Chambers, R.: Some physical properties of the cell nucleus. Science 40, 824–827 (1914); - Études de microdissection. IV. Les structures mitochondriales et nucléaires dans les cellules germinales mâles chez la sauterelle. La Cellule 35, 107–124 (1925).

    Google Scholar 

  • —, and E. L. Chambers: Explorations into the nature of the living cell. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press 1961.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, G.: Piezoelectric micromanipulators. Science 138, 84–91 (1962).

    Google Scholar 

  • Fawcett, D. W., and F. Witebsky: Observations on the ultrastructure of nucleated erythrocytes and thrombocytes, with particular reference to the structural basis of their discoidal shape. Z. Zellforsch. 62, 785–806 (1964).

    Google Scholar 

  • Forer, A.: Characterization of the mitotic traction system, and evidence that birefringent spindle fibers neither produce nor transmit force for chromosome movement. Chromosoma (Berl.) 19, 44–98 (1966).

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldstein, L., and J. M. Eastwood: Micrurgy of tissue culture cells. In: Methods in cell physiology, vol. I, p. 403–416 (D. M. Prescott, ed.). New York: Academic Press (1964).

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, P.: Some structural and functional aspects of the mitotic apparatus in sea urchin embryos. J. Cell Biol. 14, 475–487 (1962).

    Google Scholar 

  • Inoué, S.: Organization and function of the mitotic spindle. In: Primitive motile systems in cell biology, p. 549–594 (R. D. Allen and N. Kamiya, eds.) New York: Academic Press 1964.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, and A. Bajer: Birefringence in endosperm mitosis. Chromosoma (Berl.) 12, 48–63 (1961).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lockwood, A. P. M.: “Ringer” solutions and some notes on the physiological basis of their ionic composition. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. 2, 241–289 (1961).

    Google Scholar 

  • Mazia, D.: Mitosis and the physiology of cell division. In: The cell, vol. III, p. 77–412 (J. Brachet and A. E. Mirsky, eds.). New York: Academic Press (1961.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicklas, R. B.: Recurrent pole-to-pole movements of the sex chromosome during prometaphase I in Melanoplus differentialis spermatocytes. Chromosoma (Berl.) 12, 97–115 (1961); - A quantitative study of chromosomal elasticity and its influence on chromosome movement. Chromosoma (Berl.) 14, 276–295 (1963); - Chromosome velocity during mitosis as a function of chromosome size and position. J. Cell Biol. 25, Mitosis Suppl., 119–135 (1965); - Chromosome micromanipulation. II. Induced reorientation and the experimental control of segregation in meiosis. Chromosoma (Berl.) 21, 17–50 (1967).

    Google Scholar 

  • Östergren, G., J. Molè-Bajer, and A. Bajer: An interpretation of transport phenomena at mitosis. Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 90, 381–408 (1960).

    Google Scholar 

  • Roth, L. E., and E. W. Daniels: Electron microscope studies of mitosis in amebae. I. The giant ameba Pelomyxa carolinensis. J. Cell Biol. 12, 57–78 (1962).

    Google Scholar 

  • Schrader, F.: On the reality of spindle fibers. Biol. Bull. 67, 519–533 (1934); - Mitosis, 2nd ed. New York: Columbia Unversity Press 1953.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shimamura, T.: On the mechanism of nuclear division and chromosome arrangement. VI. Studies on the effect of the centrifugal force upon nuclear division. Cytologia (Tokyo) 11, 186–216 (1940).

    Google Scholar 

  • Slautterback, D. B.: Cytoplasmic microtubules. I. Hydra. J. Cell Biol. 18, 367–388 (1963).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

This investigation was supported in part by research grants GM-8480 and GM-13745 from the Division of General Medical Sciences, United States Public Health Service.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Nicklas, R.B., Staehly, C.A. Chromosome micromanipulation. Chromosoma 21, 1–16 (1967). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00330544

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00330544

Keywords

Navigation