Skip to main content
Log in

Ecosystems, externalities, and economies

  • Published:
Environmental and Resource Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper incorporates an ecosystem model into a model of a simple economy. The decisionmaking agents in the ecosystem are individual organisms aggregated to the species level. A species may provide utility directly to humans, or it may provide utility indirectly because it is used either as a raw material in goods fabrication or as sustenance for other species. We describe a comparative static equilibrium of the ecosystem where species' demands for other species are equal to the supplies of those other species, and energy is conserved. The ecosystem is then embedded in the economy so that the effects of human intervention can be traced through both the ecosystem and the economy. Human intervention creates ecosystem externalities such that ecosystem equilibria are shifted and the new equilibria affect the utility or the production processes of other humans. This framework allows us to describe in principle which ecosystem services can be efficiently usurped by humans, which waste flows can be efficiently allowed into ecosystems, and which ecosystem organisms and physical attributes can be efficiently maintained.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Caraco, T. and S. L. Lima (1985), ‘Survivorship, Energy Budgets, and Foraging Risk’, in M. Commons, S. J. Shettleworth, and J. Nevin, eds., Quantitative Analyses of Behavior, Vol. 6, Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hannon, B. (1976), ‘Marginal Product Pricing in the Ecosystem’, Journal of Theoretical Biology 56, 253–267.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirshleifer, J. (1977), ‘Economics from a Biological Standpoint’, The Journal of Law and Economics 20, 1–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hof, J., D. Rideout, and D. Binkley (1990), ‘Carbon Fixation in Trees as a Micro Optimization Process: An Example of Combining Ecology and Economics’, Ecological Economics 2, 286–294.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lotka, A. J. (1925), Elements of Physical Biology, Williams and Wilkins, Baltimore, MD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Menge, B. (1972), ‘Foraging Strategy of a Starfish in Relation to Actual Prey Availability and Environmental Predictability’, Ecological Monographs 42, 25–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muize, K. P. (1977), ‘The Great Kern County Mouse War’, Audobon 79, 159.

    Google Scholar 

  • Odum, E. P. (1971), Fundamentals of Ecology, Philadelphia: W.B. Sanders Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pimm, S. L. (1982), Food Webs, New York, NY: Chapman and Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rapport, D. J. (1978), ‘Foraging Behavior of Stentor Coeruleus: A Microeconomic Interpretation’, in A. C. Hamil and T. D. Sargent, eds., Foraging Behavior, Ecological, Ethological, and Psychological Approaches, Garland STPM Press, New York, pp. 77–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Staddon, J. E. R. (1980), Limits to Action: The Allocation of Individual Behavior, New York, NY: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ulanowicz, R. E. (1972), ‘Mass and Energy Flow in Closed Ecosystems’, Journal of Theoretical Biology 34, 239–253.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zucahetto, J. (1975), ‘Energy-Economic Theory and Mathematical Models for Combining the Systems of Man and Nature’, Ecological Modelling 1, 241–268.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Crocker, T.D., Tschirhart, J. Ecosystems, externalities, and economies. Environmental and Resource Economics 2, 551–567 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00330283

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00330283

Key words

Navigation