Skip to main content
Log in

The myth of constant predator: prey ratios

  • Community Ecology
  • Published:
Oecologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Apparent constancy in the ratio of predator species to prey species has been offered as evidence that ecological communities are structured by interspecific interactions. If significantly different from random expectation, this effect would be one of the few sound pieces of evidence for community structure. The evidence was re-evaluated by using the data from previous studies to form species pools, and forming simulated ‘communities’ by drawing species at random from these pools (with replacement). Using a correlation coefficient (number of predator species versus number of prey species), and also the statistic used by the original workers (where different), the observed predator:prey correlation was compared to that for the random communities. In five studies, the observed predator:prey ratio was not significantly different from random expectation. In the only two studies where there was significant departure from the null model, it was with more variation in the ratio than expected on a random basis. It is concluded that there is as yet no evidence for near-constant predator:prey ratios.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Briand F, Cohen JE (1984) Community food webs have scale-invariant structure. Nature 307: 264–267

    Google Scholar 

  • Closs G (1991) Multiple definitions of food web statistics: an unnecessary problem for food web research. Aust J Ecol 16: 413–415

    Google Scholar 

  • Closs G, Watterson GA, Donnelly PJ (1993) Constant predator-prey ratios: an arithmetic artifact? Ecology 74: 238–243

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen JE (1977) Ratios of prey to predators in community food webs. Nature 270: 165–167

    Google Scholar 

  • Cole BJ (1980) Trophic structure of a grassland insect community. Nature 288: 76–77

    Google Scholar 

  • Colwell RK, Winkler CW (1984) A null model for null models in biogeography. In: Strong DR Jr, Simberloff D, Abele LG, Thistle AB (eds) Ecological communities: conceptual isues and the evidence. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, pp 344–359

    Google Scholar 

  • Connor EF, Simberloff D (1979) The assembly of species communities: chance or competition? Ecology 60: 1132–1140

    Google Scholar 

  • Diamond JM (1975) Assembly of species communities. In: Cody ML, Diamond JM (eds) Ecology and evolution of communities. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass, pp 342–444

    Google Scholar 

  • Diamond JM, Gilpin ME (1982) Examination of the “null” model of Connor and Simberloff for species co-occurrence on islands. Oecologia 52: 64–74

    Google Scholar 

  • Drake JA (1990) Communities as assembled structures: do rules govern pattern? Trends Ecol Evol 5: 159–164

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans FC, Murdoch WW (1968) Taxonomic composition, trophic structure and seasonal occurrence in a grassland insect community. J Anim Ecol 37: 259–273

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaston KJ, Warren PH, Hammond PM (1992) Predator:non-predator ratios in beetle assemblages. Oecologia 90: 417–421

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall SJ, Raffaelli D (1991) Food-web patterns: lessons from a species-rich web. J Anim Ecol 60: 823–842

    Google Scholar 

  • Heatwole H, Levins R (1972) Trophic structure stability and faunal change during recolonization. Ecology 53: 531–534

    Google Scholar 

  • Jeffries MJ, Lawton JH (1985) Predator-prey ratios in communities of freshwater invertebrates: the role of enemy free space. Freshwat Biol 15: 105–112

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawton JH (1987) Are there assembly rules for successional communities? In: Gray AJ, Crawley MJ, Edwards PJ (eds) Colonization, succession and stability. Blackwell, Oxford, pp 225–244

    Google Scholar 

  • Lockwood JA, Christiansen TA, Legg DE (1990) Arthropod prey-predator ratios in a sagebrush habitat: methodological and ecological implications. Ecology 71: 996–1005

    Google Scholar 

  • May RM (1988) How many species are there on earth? Science 241: 1441–1449

    Google Scholar 

  • Mithen SJ, Lawton JH (1986) Food-web models that generate constant predator-prey ratios. Oecologia 69: 542–550

    Google Scholar 

  • Moran VC, Southwood TRE (1982) The guild composition of arthropod communities in trees. J Anim Ecol 51: 289–306

    Google Scholar 

  • Pimm SL (1991) The balance of nature? University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Pimm SL, Lawton JH, Cohen JE (1991) Food web patterns and their consequences. Nature 350: 669–674

    Google Scholar 

  • Schoenly K, Beaver RA, Heumier TA (1991) On the trophic relations of insects: a food-web approach. Am Nat 137: 597–638

    Google Scholar 

  • Simberloff D (1976) Trophic structure determination and equilibrium in an arthropod community. Ecology 57: 395–398

    Google Scholar 

  • Simberloff DS, Wilson EO (1969) Experimental zoogeography of islands: the colonization of empty islands. Ecology 50: 278–296

    Google Scholar 

  • Stork NE (1987) Guild structure of arthropods from Bornean rain forest trees. Ecol Entomol 12: 69–80

    Google Scholar 

  • Sugihara G, Schoenly K, Trombla A (1989) Scale invariance in food web properties. Science 245: 48–52

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas CD (1994) Difficulties in deducing dynamics from static distributions. Trends Ecol Evol 9: 300

    Google Scholar 

  • Tokeshi M (1986) Resource utilization, overlap and temporal community dynamics: a null model analysis of an epiphytic chironomid community. J Anim Ecol 55: 491–506

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Valen LM (1982) A pitfall in random sampling. Nature 295: 171

    Google Scholar 

  • Warren PH, Gaston KJ (1992) Predator-prey ratios: a special case of a general pattern? Phil Trans R Soc Lond B 338: 113–130

    Google Scholar 

  • Warren PH, Lawton JH (1987) Invertebrate predator-prey body size relationships: an explanation for upper triangular food webs and patterns in food web structure? Oecologia 74: 231–235

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson JB (1991) Does Vegetation Science exist? J Veg Sci 2: 289–290

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson JB (1995) Null models for assembly rules: the Jack Horner effect is more insidious than the Narcissus effect. Oikos 72: 139–143

    Google Scholar 

  • Winemiller KO (1990) Spatial and temporal variation in tropical fish trophic networks. Ecol Monogr 60: 331–367

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wilson, J.B. The myth of constant predator: prey ratios. Oecologia 106, 272–276 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00328608

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00328608

Key words

Navigation