Skip to main content
Log in

Niche dimensions of New England cottontails in relation to habitat patch size

  • Original Papers
  • Published:
Oecologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We examined physical condition, niche dimensions, and survival of New England cottontails (Sylvilagus transitionalis) that occupied 21 habitat patches of different sizes during winter. Rabbits on small patches (≤2.5 ha) were predominantly males, and both sexes had lower body mass than individuals on large patches (≥5.0 ha). Niche indices (β, where β ranges from 0 to 1. and values approaching 1 indicate generalized resource use) of habitat use revealed that rabbits on small patches used a greater variety of microhabitats (based on understory stem density: βs, and proximity to cover: βc) than rabbits occupying large patches (βs=0.65, βc=0.66). Rabbits on small patches also consumed low quality forage more often and fed at sites farther from escape cover than rabbits on large patches. There were no significant correlations between rabbit densities and niche dimensions. Niche expansion was not a result of compertitive release or relaxation of predator pressure. Rabbits on small patches apparently modified their niche dimensions in response to resource limitations. This response included occupying sites with limited understory cover that apparently resulted in rabbits on small patches having a lower survival rate (0.35) than rabbits on large patches (0.69) during a 10-week monitoring period. Skewed sex ratios and low survival rates among rabbits on small patches suggest that these habitats act as sinks to dispersing, juveniles from large (source) patches. As a result, local populations of New England cottontails may become vulnerable to extinction if larte patches of habitat are not maintained.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Andrén H, Anglestam P (1988) Elevated predation rates as an edge effect in habitat islands: experimental evidence. Ecology 69:544–547

    Google Scholar 

  • Angelstam P (1986) Predation on ground-nesting birds' nests in relation to predator densities and habitat edge. Oikos 47:365–373

    Google Scholar 

  • Bland JA, Temple SA (1990) Effects of predation-risk on habitat use by Himalayan snowcocks. Oecologia 82:187–191

    Google Scholar 

  • Bothma JP, Teer JG, Gates CE (1972) Growth and age determination of cottontail in south Texas. J Wildl Manage 36:1209–1221

    Google Scholar 

  • Boutin S (1984) Effect of late winter food addition on numbers and movements of snowshoe hares. Oecologia 62:393–400

    Google Scholar 

  • Cameron AW (1964) Competitive exclusion between rodent genera Microtus and Clethrionomys. Evolution 18:630–634

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll JP (1988) Bonfz 2.0: A basic program for analyzing availability-utilization data. Contribution No 10 Institute of Ecological Studies, University of North Dakota, Grand Forks

    Google Scholar 

  • Chapman JA, Cramer KL, Dippenaar NJ, Robinson TJ (1992) Systematics and biogeography of the New England cottontail, Sylvilagus transitionalis (Bangs, 1895), with the description of a new species from the Appalachian Mountains. Proc Biol Soc Wash 105:841–866

    Google Scholar 

  • Clough GC (1987) Ecology of island muskrats, Ondatra zibethicus, adapted to upland habitat Can Field-Nat 101:63–69

    Google Scholar 

  • Cottam G, Curtis JT (1956) The use of distance measures in phytosociological sampling. Ecology 37:451–460

    Google Scholar 

  • Crowell KL (1983) Experimental zoogeography: introductions of mice to small islands. Am Nat 107:535–555

    Google Scholar 

  • Crowell KL (1983) Islands-insight or artifact? Population dynamics and habitat utilization in insular rodents. Oikos 41:442–454

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunning JB, Danielson BJ, Pulliam HR (1992) Ecological processes that affect populations in complex landscapes. Oikos 65:169–175

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards J (1983) Diet shifts in moose due to predator avoidance. Oecologia 60:185–189

    Google Scholar 

  • Feinsinger P, Spears EE, Poole RW (1981) A simple measure of niche breadth. Ecology 62:27–32

    Google Scholar 

  • Grant PR (1969) Experimental studies of competitive interactions in two-species systems. I. Microtus and Clethrionomys in enclosures. Can J Zool 47:1099–1110

    Google Scholar 

  • Grant PR (1972) Interspecific competition among rodents. Ann Rev Ecol Syst 3:79–106

    Google Scholar 

  • Heisey DM, Fuller DK (1985) Evaluation of survival and causespecific mortality rates using telemetry data. J Wildl Manage 49:668–674

    Google Scholar 

  • Karieva P (1987) Habitat fragmentation and the stability of predatory-prey interactions. Nature 326:388–390

    Google Scholar 

  • Lidicker WJ Jr (1975). The role of dispersal in the demography of small mammals. In: Golley FB, Petrusewicz K, Ryszkowski (eds) Small mammals: their productivity and population dynamics. Cambridge University Press, New York, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Lima SL, Dill LM (1990) Behavioral decisions made under the risk of predation: a review and prospectus. Can J Zool 68:619–640

    Google Scholar 

  • Lima SL, Valine TJ, Caraco T (1985) Foraging efficiency-predation risk trade-off in the grey squirrel. Anim Behav 33:155–165

    Google Scholar 

  • Litvaitis JA (1993) Response of early successional vertebrates to historic changes in land use. Conserv Biol 7 (in press)

  • Litvaitis JA, Sherburne JA, Bissonette JA (1985a) Influence of understory characteristics on snowshoe hare habitat use and density. J Wildl Manage 49:866–873

    Google Scholar 

  • Litvaitis JA, Sherburne JA, Bissonette JA (1985b) A comparison of methods used to examine snowshoe hare habitat use. J Wildl Manage 49:632–635

    Google Scholar 

  • Litvaitis JA, Verbyla DL, Litvaitis MK (1991) A field method to differentiate New England and eastern cottontails. Trans Northeast Sect Wildl Soc 48:11–14

    Google Scholar 

  • MacArthur RH, Wilson EO (1967) The theory of island biogeography. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • Magnhagen C (1988) Predation risk and foraging in juvenile pink (Oncorhynchus gorbuscha) and chum salmon (O. keta). Can J Fish Aquat Sci 45:592–596

    Google Scholar 

  • McNamara JM, Houston AI (1984) Starvation and predation as factor limiting population size. Ecology 68:1515–1519

    Google Scholar 

  • Neu CW, Byers CR, Peek JM (1974) A technique for analysis of utilization availability data. J Wild Manage 38:541–545

    Google Scholar 

  • NOAA (National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration) (1970–1992) Climatological Data Monthly Reports. New England 82:12–98

    Google Scholar 

  • Pease JL, Vowles RH, Keith LB (1979) Interaction of snowshoe hares and woody vegetation. J Wildl Manage 43:43–60

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollock KH, Winterstein SR, Bunck CM, Curtin PD (1989) Survival analysis in telemetry studies: the staggered entry design. J Wildl Manage 53:7–15

    Google Scholar 

  • Rolstad J (1991) Consequences of forest fragmentation for the dynamics of bird populations: conceptual issues and the evidence. Biol J Linnean Soc 42:149–163

    Google Scholar 

  • SAS (1985) SAS user's guide: statistics. SAS Institute, Cary, NC

    Google Scholar 

  • Sievert PR, Keith LB (1985) Survival of snowshoe hares at a geographic range boundary. J Wildl Manage 49:854–866

    Google Scholar 

  • Small MF, Hunter ML (1988) Forest fragmentation and avian nest predation in forested landscapes. Oecologia 76:62–64

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith AT (1974) The distribution and dispersal of pikas: consequences of insular population structure. Ecology 55:1112–1119

    Google Scholar 

  • Sweitzer RA, Berger J (1992) Size-related effects of predation on habitat use and behavior of porcupines (Erethizon dorsatum). Ecology 73:867–875

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas DL, Taylor EJ (1990) Study designs and tests for comparing resource use and availability. J Wildl Manage 54:322–330

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Horne B (1982) Niches of adult and juvenile deer mice in seral stages of coniferous forest. Ecology 63:992–1003

    Google Scholar 

  • Verboom J, Schotman A, Opdam P, Metz JAJ (1991) European nuthatch metapopulations in a fragmented agricultural landscape. Oikos 61:149–156

    Google Scholar 

  • Vickery PD, Hunter ML, Wells JV (1992) Evidence of incidental nest predation and its effects on nests of threatened grassland birds. Oikos 63:281–288

    Google Scholar 

  • Weddell BJ (1991) Distribution and movements of Columbia ground squirrels (Spermophilus columbianus): are habitat patches like islands? J Biogeog 18:385–394

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilcove DS (1985) Nest predation in forest tracts and the decline of migratory songbirds. Ecology 66:1211–1214

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolff JO (1880) The role of habitat patchiness in the population dynamics of snowshoe hares. Ecol Monogr 50:111–130

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Barbour, M.S., Litvaitis, J.A. Niche dimensions of New England cottontails in relation to habitat patch size. Oecologia 95, 321–327 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00320983

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00320983

Key words

Navigation