Abstract
The present EEC and OECD Guidelines for testing skin sensitization have been reviewed in light of scientific evidence demonstrating that those methods which use Freund's Complete Adjuvant (FCA) are likely to be more accurate in predicting a probable skin-sensitizing effect of a new substance in humans than those methods not employing Freund's Complete Adjuvant. In this new test guideline, therefore, the primary testing of a substance should be carried out using one of the recommended Adjuvant methods. In special cases a non-adjuvant method may be performed in addition. Not all of the seven methods in the EEC Guideline or eight methods in the OECD Guideline have been included, but in a proposal for an updated test protocol two Adjuvant tests (Maximization test by Magnusson and Kligman and Optimization test by Maurer), and two non-Adjuvant tests (Open Epicutaneous test by Klecak and Buehler test) are suggested. The criteria for selecting these methods are based on the fact that they are well validated and widely used on a broad basis by the scientific community. Furthermore, it is considered appropriate to permit the use of a lower number of animals than presently recommended for the testing of skin sensitization. This is also in agreement with aspects of animal welfare.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Buehler EV (1965) Delayed contact hypersensitivity in the guinea pig. Arch Dermatol 91: 171–177
Buehler EV, Griffith JF (1975) Experimental skin sensitization in the guinea pig and man. In: Maibach HI (ed) Animal Models in Dermatology. Churchill Livingstone Edinburgh, p 56–66
Klecak G (1977) Identification of contact allergens: predictive tests in animals. In: Marzulli FN, Maibach HI (eds) Advances in modern toxicology, Vol. 4 Dermatotoxicology and pharmacology. Hemisphere Publishing Corporation, Washington/London. A Halsted Press Book, John Wiley & Sons, New York/London/Sidney/Toronto, p 305–339
Klecak G, Geleick H, Frey JR (1977) Screening of fragrance material for allergenicity in the guinea pig. A comparison of four testing methods. J Soc Cosmet Chem 28: 53–64
Magnusson B (1980) Identification of contact sensitizers by animal assay. Cont Derm 6: 46–50
Magnusson B, Kligman AM (1969) The identification of contact allergens by animal assay. The guinea pig maximization test. J Invest Dermatol 52: 268–276
Magnusson B, Kligman AM (1970) Allergic contact dermatitis in the guinea pig. Identifications of contact allergens. Charles C. Thomas, Springfield, Illinois
Marzulli FN, Maibach HI (1983) Dermatotoxicology, second Edition. Hemisphere Publishing Corporation. Washington/New York/London
Maurer TH (1983) In: Calna CP, Maibach HI (eds) Contact and Photocontact allergens. A manual of predictive test methods. Marcel Dekker Inc., New York and Basel
Maurer T, Thomann P, Weirich EG, Hess R (1975) The optimization test in the guinea pig. Agents Actions 5: 174–179
Maurer T, Thomann P, Weirich EG, Hess R (1978) Predictive evaluation in animals of the contact allergenic potential of medically important substances. Part I. Cont Derm 4: 321–333
Maurer T, Thomann P, Weirich EG, Hess R (1979) Predictive evaluation in animals of the contact allergenic potential of medically important substances. Part II. Cont Derm 5: 1–10
Maurer TH, Weirich EG, Hess R (1980) The optimization test in the guinea pig in relation to other predictive sensitization methods. Toxicology 15: 163–171
Ritz HL, Buehler EV (1980) Planning conduct and interpretation of guinea pig sensitization patch tests. In: Drill VA, Lazar P (eds) Current concepts in cutaneous toxicity. Academic Press, New York/London/Sydney/Toronto/San Francisco, p 25–40
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Schlede, E., Maurer, T., Potokar, M. et al. A differentiated approach to testing skin sensitization. Arch Toxicol 63, 81–84 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00316428
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00316428