Skip to main content
Log in

Dose-effect relationship of rilmenidine after chronic administration

  • Originals
  • Published:
European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

The antihypertensive efficacy and acceptability of 3 doses of rilmenidine (0.5, 1 and 2 mg, once daily) and a placebo over a 4 week period have been compared in a randomised, double-blind, parallel-group trial in 60 mild to moderate hypertensive patients. Six patients dropped out: 4 in the 2 mg-group and one in the 1 mg-group because of adverse events, and one in the placebo group for personal reason. The blood pressure was significantly decreased after the 1 and 2 mg doses with the maximum antihypertensive effect already being obtained after 1 mg. A significant dose-effect relationship was shown for supine systolic blood pressure (P=0.05) but not for the supine diastolic blood pressure.

The most beneficial efficacy/acceptability ratio was achieved at the dose of 1 mg once daily, which demonstrated the maximum antihypertensive effect associated with a low incidence of adverse events.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Gomez RE, Ernsberger P, Feinland G, Reis D (1991) Rilmenidine lowers arterial pressure via imidazole receptors in brainstem C1 area. Eur J Pharmacol 195: 181–191

    Google Scholar 

  2. Dollery CT, Davies DS, Duchier J, Pannier B, Safar ME (1988) Dose and concentration-effect relations for rilmenidine. Am J Cardiol 61: 60D-66D

    Google Scholar 

  3. Ostermann G, Brisgand B, Schmitt J, Fillastre JP (1988) Efficacy and acceptability of rilmenidine for mild to moderate systemic hypertension. Am J Cardiol 61: 76D-80D

    Google Scholar 

  4. Chalmers J, Wing L, Taylors S (1990) Analysis of time trends, individual subject responses and background variation in crossover factorial studies with antihypertensive drugs. J Hypertens 8 [Suppl 4]: S27-S35

    Google Scholar 

  5. Fillastre JP, Letac B, Galinier F, Le Bihan G, Schwartz J (1988) A multicenter double-blind comparative study of rilmenidine and clonidine in 333 hypertensive patients. Am J Cardiol 61: 81D-85D

    Google Scholar 

  6. Galley P, Manciet G, Hessel JL, Michel JP (1988) Antihypertensive efficacy and acceptability of rilmenidine in elderly hypertensive patients. Am J Cardiol 61: 86D-90D

    Google Scholar 

  7. United Kingdom Working Party on Rilmenidine (1990) Rilmenidine in mild to moderate essential hypertension. A doubleblind, randomised, parallel-group, multicenter comparison with methyldopa in 157 patients. Current Therap Res 47: 194–211

    Google Scholar 

  8. Dallochio M, Gosse P, Fillastre JP, Grollier G, Morand P, Drici M, Corcoran C (1991) La rilmenidine, un nouvel antihypertenseur dans le traitement de première intention de l'hypertension artérielle essentielle. Presse Med 20: 1265–1271

    Google Scholar 

  9. Fiorentini C, Guillet C, Guazzi M (1989) A multicentre coubleblind trial comparing rilmenidine 1 mg and hydrochlorothiazide 25 mg in 244 patients. Arch Mal Coeur 82: 39–46

    Google Scholar 

  10. Bousquet P, Feldman J, Schwartz J (1984) Central cardiovascular effect of alpha-adrenergic drug: differences between catecholamines and imidazoles. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 230: 232–236

    Google Scholar 

  11. Coupry I, Lachaud V, Podevin RA, Koenig E, Parini A (1989) Different affinities of α2 agonist for imidazoline and α2 adrenergic receptors. Am J Hypertens, 2: 468–470

    Google Scholar 

  12. Langin D, Paris H, Dauzats M, Lafontan M (1990) Discrimination between alpha 2-adrenoceptors and [3H]idazoxan — labelled non-adrenergic sites in rabbit white fat cells. Eur J Pharmacol, 188: 261–272

    Google Scholar 

  13. Lachaud-Pettiti V, Podevin RA, Chretien Y, Parini A (1991) Imidazoline-guanidinium and alpha 2 adrenergic binding sites in basolateral membranes from human kidney. Eur J Pharmacol, 206: 23–31

    Google Scholar 

  14. Tesson F, Prip-Buus C, Lemoine A, Pegorier JP, Parini A (1991) Subcellular distribution of imidazoline-guanidinium-receptive sites in human and rabbit liver. J Biol Chem 266: 155–160

    Google Scholar 

  15. Bricca G, Dontenwill M, Molines A, Feldman J, Tibirica E, Belcourt A, Bousquet P (1989) Rilmenidine selectivity for imidazoline receptors in human brain. Eur J Pharmacol 163: 373–377

    Google Scholar 

  16. Van Zwieten PA, Thoulen JMC, Jonkman FAM, Wilffert B, De Jonge A, Timmermans PBMWM (1986) Central and peripheral effects of S3341 [(N-dicyclopropylmethyl)-amino-2-oxazoline] in animal models. Arch Int Pharmacodyn Ther, 279: 130–149

    Google Scholar 

  17. Beau B, Mahieux F, Paraire M, Laurin S, Brisgand B, Vitou P (1988) Efficacy and safety of rilmenidine for arterial hypertension. Am J Cardiol 61: 95D-102D

    Google Scholar 

  18. Gould BA, Mann S, Davies AB, Altman DG, Raftery EB (1981) Does placebo lower blood pressure? Lancet II: 1377–1381

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Luccioni, R., Lambert, M., Ambrosi, P. et al. Dose-effect relationship of rilmenidine after chronic administration. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 45, 157–160 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00315498

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00315498

Key words

Navigation