Skip to main content
Log in

A principle of concretization permanence for the formation of arithmetical concepts

  • Published:
Educational Studies in Mathematics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The celebrated principle of the permanence of the rules of calculation is contrasted here with another principle, called concretization permanence principle (c.p.p.). Both apply to situations where some arithmetical operation known to children for numbers of a certain kind is to be extended so as to include further numbers (these numbers are already known to the children). In such a case, c.p.p. advises that a suitable concretization schema and a suitable paradigmatic example be chosen and then extended so as to include numbers of the broader domain; students should explore what the given concept becomes in the new situation and in this way find values of the extended operation for a sequence of examples with fixed concretization (or fixed concretization schema) and varying numbers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Dienes, Z. P.: 1963, An Experimental Study of Mathematics Learning, Hutchinson, London, New York.

  • Dienes, Z. P.: 1969, Building up Mathematics, Hutchinson, London, New York.

  • DienesZ. P. and GoldingE. W.: 1971, Approach to Modern Mathematics, Herder, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • EvesH.: 1981, Great Moments in Mathematics (after 1650), Dolciani Math. Expositions No. 7, Math. Association of America, Washington.

    Google Scholar 

  • FreudenthalH.: 1973, Mathematics as an Educational Task, Reidel, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • FreudenthalH.: 1978, Weeding and Sowing, Reidel, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freudenthal, H.: 1984: ‘The implicit philosophy of mathematics history and education’, Proceedings of the International Congress of Mathematicians in Warsaw, in print.

  • GlaeserG.: 1981, ‘Epistemologie des nombres relatifs’, Recherches en Didactiques des Mathématiques 2, 303–346.

    Google Scholar 

  • KambartelF.: 1961, ‘Logische Stellung und Konstruktive Bedeutung mathematischer Permanenzprinzipien’, Der Mathematikunterricht 7, 57–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krygowska, Z.: 1982, ‘Variables dans le raisonnement des enfants à l'âge de 8 ans’, Actes du colloque à Trento.

  • PuchalskaE.: 1983, ‘Un type d'abaque interessant, mais peu connu’, Instantanés Mathématiques (APAME Québec) 19, No. 3, 12–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • ResnickL. R. and FordW. W.: 1981, The Psychology of Mathematics for Instruction, Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, N.J.

    Google Scholar 

  • SemadeniZ.: 1983, ‘Integration of content and pedagogy in preservice training of mathematics teachers’, Proceedings Fourth Internat. Congress on Math. Education (held in Berkeley in1980), Birkhäuser, Boston, 96–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • VinnerS.: 1975, ‘The naive Platonic approach as a teaching strategy in arithmetics’, Educational Studies in Mathematics 6, 339–350.

    Google Scholar 

  • WaismannF.: 1959, Introduction to Mathematical Thinking, Harper, New York.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Semadeni, Z. A principle of concretization permanence for the formation of arithmetical concepts. Educ Stud Math 15, 379–395 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00311113

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00311113

Keywords

Navigation