Abstract
This paper reports on a project that incorporated mathematical modelling within a pre-university subject at a secondary college. The program emphasised modelling rather than models and extended over two years. A qualitative methodology was used to evaluate the program with information collected in a variety of forms including student written reports, oral interviews, video reports, diaries, questionnaire data, as well as informal observation. The program was evaluated in terms of five criteria derived from the stated aims. Erom the synthesis and triangulation of the data it was inferred that the program aims were achieved to an encouraging degree. The paper describes and illustrates key aspects of the program and its evaluation.
References
Berry, J. S., Burghes, D. N., Huntley, I. D., James, D. J. G. and Moscardini, A. O.: 1984, Teaching and Applying Mathematical Modelling, Ellis-Horwood.
Burkhardt, H.: 1984, ‘Modelling in the classroom—How can we get it to happen?’, in Berry J. S. et al., Teaching and Applying Mathematical Modelling, pp. 39–47.
Burkhardt, H.: 1983, The Real World and Mathematics, Blackie.
CockcroftW. H.: 1982, Mathematics Counts. Report of the Committee of Inquiry into the Teaching of Mathematics in School, London, HMSO.
The Open University: 1978, Mathematics Foundation Course, Mathematical Modelling Units 1 to 5, Open University Press.
The Spode Group: 1981, Solving Real Problems with Mathematics, Volume 1, Cranfield Press.
The Spode Group: 1982, Solving Real Problems with Mathematics, Volume 2, Cranfield Press.
The Spode Group: 1983, Solving Real Problems with CSE Mathematics, Cranfield Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Galbraith, P.L., Clatworthy, N.J. Beyond Standard Models—Meeting the Challenge of Modelling. Educ Stud Math 21, 137–163 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00304899
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00304899