Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Female choice contributes to offspring fitness in the field cricket, Gryllus bimaculatus (De Geer)

  • Published:
Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Females of the field cricket, Gryllus bimaculatus, are known to mate non-randomly with respect to male size. The reproductive output of females allowed to choose their mates was compared with that of females allocated mates. Females allowed to choose their mates laid a greater proportion of their available eggs, thereby investing more heavily in reproduction. Female choice did not appear to influence hatching success, suggesting that no short term benefits are derived from non-random mating. However, the offspring of females allowed to choose their mates developed more rapidly and began their own reproductive output before those of females who had been allocated mates. Furthermore, the faster developing offspring of females who chose their mates tended to have a consistantly higher survival rate as well as a lower variance in survival (i.e. less risk of mortality) at adult eclosion. Female choice may therefore contribute to offspring fitness and thus to long term reproductive success. Females allocated large males as mates did not equal those of females allowed to choose their mates, in terms of reproductive output and offspring fitness. This suggests that females may choose their mates with regard to a mixture of characters of which male size is only one.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Andersson M (1982) Female choice selects for extreme tail length in a widowbird. Nature 299:818–820

    Google Scholar 

  • Arnold SJ (1983) Sexual selection: the interface of theory and empiricism. In: Bateson P (ed) Mate choice. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 67–107

    Google Scholar 

  • Bakker K (1961) An analysis of factors which determine success in competition for food among larvae of Drosophila melanogaster. Arch Neerl Zool 14:200–281

    Google Scholar 

  • Bakker K (1969) Selection for rate of growth and its influence on competition ability of larvae of Drosophila melanogaster. Neth J Zool 19:541–595

    Google Scholar 

  • Begon M (1984) Density and individual fitness: asymmetric competition. In: Shorrocks B (ed) Evolutionary ecology. Blackwell, Oxford, pp 175–194

    Google Scholar 

  • Bentur JS, Dakshayoni K, Mathud SB (1977) Mating induced oviposition and egg production in the crickets Gryllus bimaculatus de Geer and Plebiogryllus guttiventris Walker. Z Angew Entomol 84:129–135

    Google Scholar 

  • Breed MD, Smith SK, Gall BG (1980) Systems of mate selection in a cockroach species with male dominance hierarchies. Anim Behav 28:130–134

    Google Scholar 

  • Burley N (1981) Mate choice by multiple criteria in a monogomous species. Am Nat 117:515–526

    Google Scholar 

  • Charlesworth B (1984) The evolutionary genetics of life history. In: Shorrocks B (ed) Evolutionary ecology. Blackwell, Oxford, pp 117–133

    Google Scholar 

  • Cole LC (1954) The population consequences of life history phenomena. Quart Rev Biol 29:103–137

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins NC (1980) Developmental responses to food limitation as indicators of environmental conditions for Ephydra cinerea Jones. Ecology 61:650–661

    Google Scholar 

  • Cox CR, Le Boeuf BJ (1977) Female incitation of male competition: a mechanism in sexual selection. Am Nat 111:317–335

    Google Scholar 

  • Darwin CD (1871) The descent of man and selection in relation to sex. Murray, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Dingle H, Brown CK, Hegmann JP (1977) The nature of genetic variance influencing photoperiodic diapause in a migrant insect, Oncopeltus fasciatus. Am Nat 111:1047–1059

    Google Scholar 

  • Engelmann F (1970) The physiology of insect reproduction. Pergamon Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Falconer DS (1981) Introduction to quantitative genetics, 2nd ed. Longman, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher RA (1930) The genetic theory of natural selection, 2nd ed. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Gillespie JH (1977) Natural selection for variance in offspring numbers: a new evolutionary principle. Am Nat 111:1010–1014

    Google Scholar 

  • Halliday TR (1983) The study of mate choice. In: Bateson P (ed) Mate choice. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 3–32

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey IF, Corbet PS (1985) Territorial behaviour of larvae enhances mating success of male dragonflies. Anim Behav 33:561–565

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughes AL, Hughes MK (1985) Female choice of males in a polygynous insect, the whitespotted sawyer, Monochomus scutellatus. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 17:385–388

    Google Scholar 

  • Istock CA (1978) Fitness variation in a natural population. In: Dingle H (ed) Evolution of insect migration and diapause. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 171–190

    Google Scholar 

  • Istock CA (1983) The extent and consequences of heritable variation for fitness characters. In: King CE, Dawson PS (eds) Population biology: retrospect and prospect. Columbia University Press, Columbia, pp 61–96

    Google Scholar 

  • Kodric-Brown A (1983) Determinants of male reproductive success in pupfish (Cyprinoden pecesensis). Anim Behav 31:128–137

    Google Scholar 

  • Lande R (1976) The maintenance of genetic variability by mutation in a polygenic character with linked loci. Genet Res 26:221–235

    Google Scholar 

  • Lande R (1981) Models of specification by sexual selection of polygenic traits. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 78:3721–3725

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewontin RC (1965) Selection for colonizing ability. In: Baker HG, Stebbins GL (eds) The genetics of colonizing species. Academic Press, New York, pp 77–94

    Google Scholar 

  • Loher W, Rence B (1978) The mating behaviour of Teleogryllus commodus (Walker) and its central and peripheral control. Z Tierpsychol 46:225–259

    Google Scholar 

  • Maynard Smith J (1956) Fertility, mating behaviour and sexual selection in Drosophila subobscura. J Genet 54:261–279

    Google Scholar 

  • Maynard Smith J (1978) The evolution of sex. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Meats A (1971) The relative importance to population increase of fluctuations in mortality, fecundity and the time variable of the reproductive schedule. Oecologia (Berl) 6:223–237

    Google Scholar 

  • Merkel G (1977) The effects of temperature and food quality on the larval development of Gryllus bimaculatus (Orthoptera, Gryllidae). Oecologia (Berl) 30:129–140

    Google Scholar 

  • Moeur JE, Istock CA (1980) Ecology and evolution of the pitcher-plant mosquito. IV. Larval influence over adult reproductive performance and longevity. J Anim Ecol 49:775–792

    Google Scholar 

  • O'Donald P (1980) Sexual selection by female choice in a monogamous bird: Darwins theory corroborated. Heredity 45:201–217

    Google Scholar 

  • O'Donald P (1983) Sexual selection by female choice. In: Bateson P (ed) Mate choice. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 53–66

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker GA (1982) Phenotype-limited evolutionary stable strategies. In: Bertram BR, Clutton-Brock TH, Dunbar RIM, Rubenstein DI, Wrangham R (eds) Current problems in sociobiology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 173–201

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker GA (1983) Mate quality and mating decisions. In: Bateson P (ed) Mate choice. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 141–166

    Google Scholar 

  • Partridge L (1980) Mate choice increases a component of offspring fitness in fruit flies. Nature 283:290–291

    Google Scholar 

  • Partridge L (1983) Non-random mating and offspring fitness. In: Bateson P (ed) Mate choice. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 227–255

    Google Scholar 

  • Partridge L, Halliday TR (1984) Mating patterns and mate choice. In: Krebs JR, Davies NB (eds) Behavioural ecology: an evolutionary approach. Blackwell, London, pp 222–250

    Google Scholar 

  • Prout T, McChesney F (1985) Competition among immatures affects their adult fertility: population dynamics. Am Nat 126:521–558

    Google Scholar 

  • Qayyum HA, Wahla MM (1969) Biology of Gryllus bimaculatus De Geer. Pakist J Sci Res 21:112–116

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryan MJ (1980) Female mate choice in a neotropical frog. Science 209:523–525

    Google Scholar 

  • Rivnay E, Ziv M (1963) Contribution to the biology of Gryllus bimaculatus Deg, in Israel. Bull Ent Res 54:37–43

    Google Scholar 

  • Sang JH, Clayton GA (1957) Selection for larval development time in Drosophila. J Heredity 48:265–270

    Google Scholar 

  • Sigurjonsdottir H (1984) Food competition among Scatophaga stercoraria larvae with emphasis on its effects on reproductive success. Ecol Entomol 9:81–90

    Google Scholar 

  • Simmons LW (1986a) Intermale competition and mating success in the field cricket, Gryllus bimaculatus (De Geer). Anim Behav 34:567–579

    Google Scholar 

  • Simmons LW (1986b) Female choice in the field cricket, Gryllus bimaculatus (De Geer). Anim Behav 34:1463–1470

    Google Scholar 

  • Simmons LW (1987a) Competition between larvae of the field cricket, Gryllus bimaculatus (Orthoptera: Gryllidae) and its effects on some life history components of fitness. J Anim Ecol (in press)

  • Simmons LW (1987b) Male size, mating potential and lifetime reproductive success in the field cricket, Gryllus bimaculatus (De Geer). Anim Behav (in press)

  • Simmons LW (1987c) Heritability of a male character chosen by females of the field cricket, Gryllus bimaculatus. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 21:129–133

    Google Scholar 

  • Simmons LW (1987d) Sperm competition as a mechanism of female choice in the field cricket, Gryllus bimaculatus. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 21:197–202

    Google Scholar 

  • Thornhill R (1980) Competitive charming males and choosy females: was Darwin correct? Fla Entomol 63:5–30

    Google Scholar 

  • Thornhill R (1983) Cryptic female choice and its implications in the scorpion fly Horpobittacus nigriceps. Am Nat 122:765–788

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Noordwijk AJ, Van Balan JH, Scharloo W (1980) Heritability of ecologically important traits in the great tit (Parus major L.). Ardea 68:193–203

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams GC (1975) Sex and evolution. Princeton University Press, Princeton USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams SM (1985) The maintenance of polymorphism owing to differences in development time and competition. Can J Genet Cytol 27:328–333

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Author notes

  1. L. W. Simmons

    Present address: Department of Zoology, University of Liverpool, Brownlow Street, P.O. Box 147, L69 3BX, Liverpool, United Kingdom

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Animal Behaviour Research Group, Department of Zoology, University of Nottingham, University Park, NG7 2RD, Nottingham, United Kingdom

    L. W. Simmons

Authors
  1. L. W. Simmons
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Simmons, L.W. Female choice contributes to offspring fitness in the field cricket, Gryllus bimaculatus (De Geer). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 21, 313–321 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00299969

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00299969

Keywords

Search

Navigation