Skip to main content
Log in

Behavioral and electrophysiological responses of the blowfly, Phormia regina meigen, to acids

  • Published:
Zeitschrift für vergleichende Physiologie Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Flies of a standardized degree of thirst were tested for proboscis extension in response to mono- and dicarboxylic acids applied to the tarsi. Presence or lack of extension depended on pH for each acid, but acids of greater chain length were effective in preventing extension at higher pH values than those with shorter chain length (Fig. 1). Concentrated solutions of monocarboxylic acids at low pH values evoked a strange, delayed, hesitant form of proboscis extension which seemed to signify rejection rather than acceptance. It was not abolished by satiation with either water or sucrose (Fig. 2).

Electrophysiological tests of tarsal hairs with NaCl and sucrose showed that the corresponding hairs of each type on opposite sides of the same individual leg had almost identical neural responses to a given stimulus (Table). This meant that hairs on one side of a leg could be used as controls for hairs on the other side.

Comparisons were made of the neural responses to different pH values of each acid and of the responses to different acids at the same pH. For each acid, as the pH decreased the response increased both in number of neurons firing and in their firing frequency (Fig. 6). There were differences between the responses to different acids at the same pH correlated with the nature of the behavioral response at the pH value tested. In general, responses were greater to mono- than to dicarboxylic acids (Figs. 7–10).

Lack of proboscis extension was correlated with the firing of a small spike of regular frequency, especially prominent in responses of D4 hairs, and with firing of the salt receptor. The strange, hesitant extension was correlated with the indiscriminate firing of a large number of neurons at irregular frequencies. It is concluded that flies have available information enabling them to distinguish acids from salts, sugars, and water. The basis for this distinction is at least in part anatomical. Flies also can distinguish between different specific acids at the same pH, depending on the molecular structure of the acids.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Chadwick, L. E., and V. G. Dethier: The relationship between chemical structure and the response of blowflies to tarsal stimulation by aliphatic acids. J. gen. Physiol. 30, 255–262 (1947).

    Google Scholar 

  • Dethier, V. G.: The role of olfaction in alcohol ingestion by the blowfly. J. Insect Physiol. 6, 222–230 (1961).

    Google Scholar 

  • —: Chemosensory input and taste discrimination in the blowfly. Science 161, 389–391 (1968).

    Google Scholar 

  • —, and L. E. Chadwick: Rejection thresholds of the blowfly for a series of aliphatic alcohols. J. gen. Physiol. 30, 247–253 (1947).

    Google Scholar 

  • —, and L. E. Chadwick: An analysis of the relationship between solubility and stimulating effect in tarsal chemoreception. J. gen. Physiol. 33, 589–599 (1950).

    Google Scholar 

  • —, and D. R. Evans: The physiological control of water ingestion in the blowfly. Biol. Bull. 121, 108–116 (1961).

    Google Scholar 

  • —, and F. E. Hanson: Electrophysiological responses of the chemoreceptors of the blowfly to sodium salts of fatty acids. Proc. nat. Acad. Sci. (Wash.) 60, 1296–1303 (1968).

    Google Scholar 

  • —, R. L. Solomon, and L. H. Turner: Sensory input and central excitation and inhibition in the blowfly. J. comp. physiol. Psychol. 60, 303–313 (1965).

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, D. R.: The effect of odours on ingestion by the blowfly. J. Insect Physiol. 7, 299–304 (1961).

    Google Scholar 

  • —, and De F. Mellon: Electrophysiological studies of a water receptor associated with the taste sensilla of the blowfly. J. gen. Physiol. 45, 487–500 (1962a).

    Google Scholar 

  • —, and De F. Mellon: Stimulation of a primary taste receptor by salts. J. gen. Physiol. 45, 651–661 (1962b).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gillary, H. L.: Stimulation of the salt receptor of the blowfly. I. NaCl. J. gen. Physiol. 50, 337–350 (1966).

    Google Scholar 

  • Grabowski, C. T., and V. G. Dethier: The structure of the tarsal chemoreceptors of the blowfly, Phormia regina Meigen. J. Morph. 94, 1–17 (1954).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, D. L., V. A. Bell, and L. E. Chadwick: Rearing of the blowfly, Phormia regina Meigen, on a sterile synthetic diet. Ann. entomol. Soc. Amer. 40, 213–216 (1947).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodgson, E. S.: Electrophysiological studies of arthropod chemoreception. II. Responses of labellar chemoreceptors of the blowfly to stimulation by carbohydrates. J. Insect Physiol. 1, 240–247 (1957).

    Google Scholar 

  • —, J. Y. Lettvin, and K. D. Roeder: The physiology of a primary chemoreceptor unit. Science 122, 417 (1955).

    Google Scholar 

  • —, and K. D. Roeder: Electrophysiological studies of arthropod chemoreception. I. General properties of the labellar chemoreceptors of Diptera. J. cell. comp. Physiol. 48, 51–75 (1956).

    Google Scholar 

  • McCutchan, M. C.: The physiology of acid rejection by the blowfly, Phormia regina Meigen. Doctoral Dissertation, Univ. of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stürckow, B., J. R. Adams, and T. A. Wilcox: The neurons in the labellar nerve of the blow fly. Z. vergl. Physiol. 54, 268–289 (1967).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

This work was supported by National Science Foundation grant GB 1472 to Dr. V. G. Dethier and by a National Science Foundation Graduate Fellowship to the author.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

McCutchan, M.C. Behavioral and electrophysiological responses of the blowfly, Phormia regina meigen, to acids. Z. Vergl. Physiol. 65, 131–152 (1969). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00297681

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00297681

Keywords

Navigation