Skip to main content
Log in

Male choice

Experimental demonstration in a brentid weevil

  • Published:
Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Male preference for large females as mates was demonstrated in the wood-boring weevil, Brentus anchorago (Coleoptera: Brentidae) by observation and by mate choice experiments in which the complicating factor of male rivalry was eliminated. Adult weight varied at least 23-fold in a large breeding aggregation in Panama. Drilling females guarded by males were larger than unguarded drilling females, and the number of males attending a drilling female increased with length of the female. Thus despite a sex ratio of about 1:1, males were unevenly distributed among the females. A male attending a female had on average about 1 rival male in his vicinity (Lloyd's Index of Mean Crowding). Male preference for large females in the absence of rival males was directly tested in choice arenas on the surface of the host tree. When a large and a small female were simultaneously presented, large and small males alike mated first with the large female. Male choice of large females is probably adaptive in Brentus anchorago because larger females lay larger eggs, which produce larger offspring in a competitive larval environment. Male choice in this species is associated with high male mating investment and time commitment per female, and not with high male parental investment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adams TS, Mulla MS (1968) Ovarian development, pheromone production and mating in the eye gnat, Hippelates collusor. J Insect Physiol 14:627–635

    Google Scholar 

  • Alcock J (1979) Multiple mating in Calopteryx maculata (Odonata: Calopterygidae) and the advantage of non-contact guarding by males. J Nat Hist 13:439–446

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewsbury DA (1982) Ejaculate cost and male choice. Am Nat 119:601–610

    Google Scholar 

  • Fitzgerald KT (1979) Mate selection as a function of male choice and female body size in lizards. Paper presented at meeting of Anim Behav Society, June 1979, New Orieans

  • Gwynne DT (1983) Male nutritional investment and the evolution of sexual differences in Tettigoniidae and other Orthoptera. In: Gwynne DT, Morris GK (eds) Orthopteran mating systems. Westview Press, Boulder, Colo

    Google Scholar 

  • Haedo Rossi JA (1961) Bréntidos argentinos (Brenthidae, Coleoptera). Opera Lilloana 6:1–317

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson LK (1982) Sexual selection in a brentid weevil. Evolution 36:251–262

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson LK (1983) Brentus anchorago (bréntido, brentid beetle). In: Janzen DH (ed) Costa Rican natural history. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, Ill

    Google Scholar 

  • Lenington S (1983) Social preferences for partners carrying ‘good genes’ in wild house mice. Anim Behav 31:325–333

    Google Scholar 

  • Lloyd M (1967) ‘Mean crowding’. J Anim Ecol 36:1–30

    Google Scholar 

  • Manning JT (1975) Male discrimination and investment in Asellus aquaticus (L.) and A. meridianus Racovitza (Crustacea: Isopoda). Behaviour 55:1–14

    Google Scholar 

  • Orians GH (1969) On the evolution of mating systems in birds and mammals. Am Nat 103:589–603

    Google Scholar 

  • Palmer JO (1981) Life history consequences of resource seasonality in the milkweed leaf beetle, Labidomera clivicollis. PhD thesis, University of Texas, Austin

    Google Scholar 

  • Pickford R, Gillott C (1972) Courthship behavior of the migratory grasshopper, Melanoplus sanguinipes (Orthoptera: Acrididae). Can Entomol 104:715–722

    Google Scholar 

  • Rence B, Loher W (1977) Contact chemoreceptive sex recognition in the male cricket, Teleogryllus commodus. Physiol Entomol 2:225–236

    Google Scholar 

  • Scivittaro A, Soares BAM (1978) Sobre Tinoteramocerus enormis Kleine (Coleoptera, Brentidae). Rev Bras Entomol 22:49–52

    Google Scholar 

  • Sillén-Tullberg B (1981) Prolonged copulation: a male ‘postcopulatory’ strategy in a promiscuous species, Lygaeus equestris (Heteroptera: Lygaeidae). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 9:283–289

    Google Scholar 

  • Thornhill R, Alcock J (1983) The evolution of insect mating systems. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass

    Google Scholar 

  • Trivers RL (1972) Parental investment and sexual selection. In: Campbell B (ed) Sexual selection and the descent of man. Aldine, Chicago, Ill

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker WF (1980) Sperm utilization strategies in nonsocial insects. Am Nat 115:780–799

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiser J (1963) Sporozoan infections. In: Steinhaus EA (ed) Insect pathology, an advanced treatise, vol 2. Academic Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams GC (1966) Adaptation and natural selection. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood SL (1952) Observations on the homologies of the copulatory apparatus in male Coleoptera. Ann Entomol Soc Am 45:613–617

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodhead AP (1983) Interaction of gamete competition and development on components of fitness in the cockroach Diploptera punctata (Eschscholtz). PhD thesis, University of Iowa, Iowa City

    Google Scholar 

  • Zucker I, Wade G (1968) Sexual preferences of male rats. J Comp Physiol Psychol 6:816–819

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Johnson, L.K., Hubbell, S.P. Male choice. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 15, 183–188 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00292973

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00292973

Keywords

Navigation