Abstract
Socialization into traditional sex-role concepts has been offered as an explanation of sex differences in self-disclosure. The present experiment tested a derivation of this hypothesis: Androgynous males would self-disclose more intimately than sex-typed males. A 2×2×2×2 factorial design was used with sex of subject, sex-role concept of subject, sex of target person, and disclosure level of target person as the independent variables. The results failed to demonstrate an overall difference between androgynous and sex-typed males, while significant sex differences and a strong reciprocity effect were obtained. With both male and female subjects, androgynous subjects did disclose more than sex-typed subjects when the target person had exhibited high disclosure. The findings are discussed in terms of two hypotheses: (1) compliance to a social norm regarding male disclosure to strangers; (2) flexibility of the disclosing behavior of androgynous subjects.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bem, S. L. The measurement of psychological androgyny. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1974, 42, 155–162.
Bem, S. L. On the utility of alternative procedures for assessing psychological androgyny. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1977, 45, 196–205.
Bloch, E. L., & Goodstein, L. D. Comments on “Influence of an Interviewer's Disclosure on the Self-Disclosing Behavior of Interviewees.” Journal of Counseling Psychology, 1971, 18, 595–597.
Block, J. H. Conceptions of sex role: Some cross-cultural and longitudinal perspectives. American Psychologist, 1973, 28, 512–526.
Brooks, L. Interactive effects of sex and status on self-disclosure. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 1974, 21, 469–474.
Chaikin, A. L., & Derlega, V. J. Norms affecting self-disclosure in men and women. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1976, 44, 376–380.
Chelune, G. J. Self-disclosure: An elaboration of its basic dimensions. Psychological Reports, 1975, 36, 79–85.
Chelune, G. J. A multidimensional look at sex and target differenes in disclosure. Psychological Reports, 1976, 39(1), 259–263.
Cozby, P. C. Self-disclosure: A literature review. Psychological Bulletin, 1973, 79, 73–91.
Dimond, R. E., & Hellkamp, D. T. Race, sex, ordinal position of birth, and self-disclosure in high school students. Psychological Reports, 1969, 25, 235–238.
Goodstein, L. D., & Reinecker, V. M. Factors affecting self-disclosure: A literature review. In B. A. Maher (Ed.), Progress in experimental personality research (Vol. 7). New York: Academic Press, 1974.
Himelstein, P., & Lubin, B. Relationship of the MMPI K-scale and a measure of self-disclosure in a normal population. Psychological Reports, 1966, 19, 166.
Jourard, S. M. A study of self-disclosure. Scientific American, 1958, 198(May), 77–82.
Jourard, S. M. Self-disclosure and other cathexis. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 1959, 59, 428–431.
Jourard, S. M. Self-disclosure: An experimental analysis of the transparent self. New York: Wiley-Interscience, 1971. (a)
Jourard, S. M. The transparent self (rev. ed.). New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold, 1971. (b)
Jourard, S. M., & Landsman, M. J. Cognition, cathexis and the “dyadic effect” in man's self-disclosing behavior. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 1960, 6, 178–186.
Jourard, S. M., & Lasakow, P. Some factors in self-disclosure. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 1958, 56, 91–98.
Jourard, S. M., & Richman, P. Disclosure output and input in college students. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 1963, 9, 141–148.
Kopfstein, J. H., & Kopfstein, D. Correlates of self-disclosure in college students. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1973, 41, 163.
Lomranz, J., & Shapira, A. Communicative patterns of self-disclosure and touching behavior. Journal of Psychology, 1974, 88, 223–227.
Morgan, B. S. Intimacy of disclosure topics and sex differences in self-disclosure. Sex Roles, 1976, 2, 161–166.
Nunnally, J. C. Psychometric theory. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1967.
Plog, S. C. The disclosure of self in the United States and Germany. Journal of Social Psychology, 1965, 65, 193–205.
Rubin, Z. Disclosing oneself to a stranger: Reciprocity and its limits. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 1975, 11, 233–240.
Rubin, Z., Hill, C. T., Peplau, L. A., & Dukel-Schetter, C. Self-disclosure in dating couples: Sex roles and the ethic of openness. Journal of Marriage & the Family, 1980, 42, 305–317.
Stefic, E. C., & Lorr, M. Age and sex differences in personality during adolescence. Psychological Reports, 1974, 35, 1123–1126.
Weigel, R. G., Weigel, V. M., & Chadwick, P. C. Reported and projected self-disclosure. Psychological Reports, 1969, 24, 283–287.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
An earlier version of this paper was presented at the meeting of the Eastern Psychological Association, Washington, D.C., March 1978. The authors are indebted to two anonymous reviewers for their suggestions concerning this article.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gerdes, E.P., Gehling, J.D. & Rapp, J.N. The effects of sex and sex-role concept on self-disclosure. Sex Roles 7, 989–998 (1981). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00288500
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00288500