Skip to main content
Log in

Role of two operators in regulating the plasmid-borne raf operon of Escherichia coli

  • Original Articles
  • Published:
Molecular and General Genetics MGG Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The plasmid-borne raf operon encodes functions required for the inducible uptake and utilization of raffinose in Escherichia coli K12. The expression of three structural genes for α-galactosidase (rafA), Raf permease (rajB) and sucrose hydrolase (rafD) is negatively controlled by the binding of RafR repressor (rafR) to two operator sites, O1 and O2, that flank the − 35 sequence of the raf promoter, PA. In vitro, O1 and 02 are occupied on increasing the concentration of RafR, without detectable preference for one site or the other or any indication of cooperative binding. Nucleotide substitutions at positions 3, 4 or 5 in an operator half-site prevented repressor binding, supporting a model that postulates specific interactions of these base pairs with the recognition helix of RafR. To study the role of each operator site, we have compared by gel shift analysis the binding of purified RafR repressor to DNA fragments containing the original 0102 configuration or mutant O1 or 02. When either one of the two operators was inactivated by site-directed mutagenesis, both 01 and 02 exhibited the same affinity for repressor and the same sensitivity to arrest of repressor binding by the natural inducer, melibiose. However, in the native 0102 configuration, simultaneous binding of RafR to both operators was sterically hindered, leading to a 13-fold decrease in the intrinsic affinity of an operator site for repressor, once the other site had been occupied. To assess the role of each operator in vivo, rafA was used as a reporter gene. A 1200-fold repression (100%) was exerted by RafR binding to the native O1O2 configuration, whereas 02 alone exerted 45% and 01 alone 6% repression of rafA transcription. The differential effects of 01 versus 02 on transcription (despite matching affinities of 01 and 02 for repressor) suggest that positioning of the O2-repressor complex between the — 35 and —10 signals is crucial for transcription control and that repressor binding to the upstream 01 serves to enhance this effect.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ansari AZ, Chael ML, O'Halloran TV (1992) Allosteric underwinding of DNA is a critical step in positive control of transcription by Hg-MerR. Nature 355:87–89

    Google Scholar 

  • Aslanidis C (1987) Totalsequenz des raf Operons: Struktur, Funktionen und Regulation. PhD thesis, University of Regensburg, FRG

    Google Scholar 

  • Aslanidis C, Schmitt R (1990) Regulatory elements of the rafnose operon: nucleotide sequences of operator and repressor genes. J Bacteriol 172:2178–2180

    Google Scholar 

  • Aslanidis C, Schmid K, Schmitt R (1989) Nucleotide sequences and operon structure of plasmid-borne genes mediating uptake and utilization of raffinose in Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol 171:6753–6763

    Google Scholar 

  • Aslanidis C, Muiznieks I, Schmitt R (1990) Successive binding of rat repressor to adjacent raf operator sites in vitro. Mol Gen Genet 223:297–304

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradford M (1976) A rapid method for the quantition of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal Biochem 72:248–254

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunn TM, Hahn S, Ogden S, Schleif RF (1984) An operator at −280 base pairs that is required for repression of araBAD operon promoter: addition of DNA helical turns between the operator and promoter cyclically hinders repression. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 81:5017–5020

    Google Scholar 

  • Eismann E, Muffler-Hill B (1990) lac repressor forms stable loops in vitro with supercoiled wild type lac DNA containing all three natural lac operators. J Mol Biol 213:763–775

    Google Scholar 

  • Eismann E, von Wilcken-Bergmann B, Müller-Hill B (1987) Specific destruction of the second lac operator decreases the the repression of lac operon in Escherichia coli fivefold. J Mol Biol 195:949–952

    Google Scholar 

  • Fried M, Crothers DM (1981) Equilibria and kinetics of lac repressor-operator interactions by polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. Nucleic Acids Res 9:6505–6525

    Google Scholar 

  • Fritz H-J, Bicknäse H, Gleumes B, Heibach C, Roshsahl S, Ehring R (1983) Characterization of two mutations in Escherichia coli galE gene inactivating the second galactose operator and comparative studies of repressor binding. EMBO J 2:2129–2135

    Google Scholar 

  • Garner MM, Revzin A (1981) A gel electrophoresis method for quantifying the binding of proteins to specific DNA regions: applications to E. coli lactose operon regulatory system. Nucleic Acids Res 9:3047–3060

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanahan D (1983) Studies on transformation of Escherichia coli with plasmids. J Mol Biol 166:557–568

    Google Scholar 

  • Hudson JM, Fried M (1990) Cooperative interactions between the catabolite repressor gene activator protein and the lac repressor at the lactose promoter. J Mol Biol 214:381–396

    Google Scholar 

  • Irani MH, Orosz L, Adhya S (1983) A control element within a structural gene: the gal operon of Escherichia coli. Cell 32:783–787

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaenicke R, Muiznieks I, Aslanidis C, Schmitt R (1990) Ultracentrifugal analysis of the quartenary structure of raf repressor from Escherichia coli. FEBS Lett 260:233–235

    Google Scholar 

  • Krämer H, Niemöller M, Amouyal M, Revet B, von Wilcken-Bergmann B, Müller-Hill B (1987) lac repressor forms loops with linear DNA carrying two suitably spaced lac operators. EMBO J 6:1481–1491

    Google Scholar 

  • Lanzer M, Bujard H (1988) Promoters largely determine the efficiency of repressor action. Proc Nall Acad Sci USA 85:8973–8977

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee J, Goldfarb A (1991) lac repressor acts by modifying the initial transcribing complex so that it cannot leave the promoter. Cell 66:793–798

    Google Scholar 

  • Lehming N, Sartorius J, Niemöller M, Genenger G, von WilckenBergmann B, Müller-Hill B (1987) The interactions of the recognition helix of lac repressor with lac operator. EMBO J 6:3145–3153

    Google Scholar 

  • Lehming N, Sartorius J, Kisters-Woike B, von Wilcken-Bergmann B, Müller-Hill B (1990) Mutant lac repressors with new specificities hint at rules for protein-DNA recognition. EMBO J 9:615–621

    Google Scholar 

  • Maniatis T, Fritsch EF, Sambrook J (1982) Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Oehler S, Eismann E, Kramer H, Müller-Hill B (1990) The three operators of the lac operon cooperate in repression. EMBO J 9:973–981

    Google Scholar 

  • Pabo CO, Sauer RT (1984) Protein-DNA recognition. Annu Rev Biochem 53:293–321

    Google Scholar 

  • Sartorius J, Lehming N, Kisters B, von Wickeln-Bergmann B, Müller-Hill B (1989) lac repressor mutants with double or triple exchanges in the recognition helix bind specifically to lac operator variants with multiple exchanges. EMBO J 8:1265–1270

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmid K, Schmitt R (1976) Raffinose metabolism in Escherichia coli K12. Purification and properties of a new a-galactosidase specified by a transmissable plasmid. Eur J Biochem 67:95–104

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmid K, Ritschewald S, Schmitt R (1979) Relationships among raffinose plasmids determined by the immunochemical crossreaction of their α-galactosidases. J Gen Microbiol 114: 477–481

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmitt R, Mattes R, Schmid K, Altenbuchner J (1979) Raf plasmids in strains of Escherichia coli and their possible role in enteropathogeny. In: Timmis KN, Pühler A (eds) Plasmids of medical, environmental and commercial interest. Elsevier North Holland Biomedical Press, Amsterdam, pp 199–210

    Google Scholar 

  • Straney DC, Straney SB, Crothers DM (1989) Synergy between Escherichia coli CAP protein and RNA polymerase in lac promoter open complexes. J Mol Biol 206:41–57

    Google Scholar 

  • Stueber D, Bujard H (1982) Transcription from efficient promoters can interfere with plasmid replication and diminish expression of plasmid specified genes. EMBO J 1:1399–1404

    Google Scholar 

  • Tuggle CK, Fuchs JA (1986) Regulation of the operon encoding ribonucleotide reductase in Escherichia coli: evidence for both positive and negative control. EMBO J 5:1077–1081

    Google Scholar 

  • Valentin-Hansen P, Albrechtsen B, Love Larsen JE (1986) DNA-protein recognition: demonstration of three genetically separated operator elements that are required for repression of Escherichia coli deoCABD promoters by DeoR repressor. EMBO J 5:2015–2021

    Google Scholar 

  • Vieira J, Messing J (1982) The pUC plasmids. An M13mp7-derived system for insertion mutagenesis and sequencing with synthetic primers. Gene 33:259–268

    Google Scholar 

  • Weickert MJ, Adhya S (1992) A family of bacterial regulators homologous to Gal and Lac repressors. J Biol Chem 267:15869–15874

    Google Scholar 

  • Yanisch-Perron C, Vieira J, Messing J (1985) Improved M13 phage cloning vectors and host strains: nucleotide sequences of the M13mp8 and pCU19 vectors. Gene 33:103–119

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Communicated by W Goebel

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Muiznieks, I., Schmitt, R. Role of two operators in regulating the plasmid-borne raf operon of Escherichia coli . Molec. Gen. Genet. 242, 90–99 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00277352

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00277352

Key words

Navigation