Summary
Populations of induced polyploids invariably contain a substantial proportion of aneuploid individuals. A model is described which can predict the level of aneuploidy in successive generations of a closed population of Lolium tetraploids. The results demonstrate clearly that the proportion of aneuploid individuals increases sharply for two to three generations and then stabilizes at a level determined by the gametic output of the euploid plants. A change in the gametic output of aneuploid individuals has a relatively small effect on the final level of aneuploidy reached.
Similar content being viewed by others
Literature
Ahloowalia, B.S. (1971): Frequency, origin and survival of aneuploids in tetraploid ryegrass. Genetica 42, 129–138
Hagberg, A.; Ellstrom, S. (1959): The competition between diploid, tetraploid and aneuploid rye. Hereditas 45, 369–416
Hossain, M.G. (1978): Selection in tetraploid rye. III. Frequency and performance of aneuploids. Euphytica 27, 137–143
Morrison, J.W. (1956): Chromosome behaviour and fertility in tetra petkus rye. Can. J. Agric. Sci. 36, 157–165
Muntzing, A. (1943): Aneuploidy and seed shrivelling in tetraploid rye. Hereditas 29, 65–75
Nagata, T.; Okabe, T. (1978): Frequency of aneuploids in autotetraploid populations of Italian ryegrass (L. multiflorum). Jpn J. Breeding 28, 205–210
Rommel, M. (1961): Aneuploidy. Seed set and sterility in artificially induced autotetraploid Hordeum vulgare. Can. J. Gen. Cytol. 3, 272–282
Simonsen, Q. (1973): Cytogenetic investigation in a diploid and autotetraploid population of Lolium perenne. Hereditas 75, 157–188
Simonsen, Q. (1975): Cytogenetic investigations in diploid and autotetraploid population of Festuca pratensis. Hereditas 79, 73–108
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Communicated by R. Riley
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Evans, G.M., Davies, E.W. The dynamics of aneuploidy in an induced tetraploid population of Lolium multiflorum x Lolium perenne . Theoret. Appl. Genetics 62, 39–44 (1982). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00276280
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00276280