Heterospecific transformation of Pneumococcus and Streptococcus

Summary

Transformations of two linked ribosomal loci (str and ery) were carried out between the SIII-1 strain of pneumococcus and the Challis and SBE strains of group H streptococcus. Transfer of markers between the Challis and SBE strains is as efficient as in the corresponding intrastrain transformations. Transfer between either of these strains and the pneumococcus, however, is less efficient than in the corresponding intrastrain transformation, and is referred to as heterospecific transformation. The inefficiency of the heterospecific transformation is due neither to specific lethality nor reduced uptake of heterologous DNA.

When DNA was extracted from the hybrid resulting from a heterospecific cross and used to transform the original donor and recipient species, we found: (a) no donor material in the hybrid DNA responsible for the markedly low efficiency of integration into the recipient species; (b) donor material, in addition to the transforming marker itself, detectable by the higher efficiency with which hybrid DNA transforms the original donor species than does DNA from the original recipient species.

DNA was extracted from each of 36 independently derived, doubly marked transformants resulting from the cross: Challis str-s ery-sxSIII-1 str-r53 ery-r2 DNA. Variability was observed between the different hybrid DNAs when the integration efficiency of the str marker in each DNA was compared with that of the ery marker. Variability of as great a magnitude was not observed when the same hybrid DNA was tested in repeated experiments, or when different DNA preparations were extracted from the same hybrid strain, or when several DNA preparations were obtained from a number of independent homospecific transformants. It is concluded that different kinds of donor material are present in the various hybrids, and that the nature of this extra-marker material affects the integration of the marker.

Linkage of the str and ery markers was reduced in heterospecific transformations. The kind of donor DNA in the hybrid genome did not affect the linkage reduction observed when the str and ery markers were transferred back to the donor species in which they originated. Indeed, this linkage reduction was the same as that observed when the markers were originally transferred from the SIII-1 to the Challis strain. Specific factors reducing linkage in heterologous crosses must, therefore, be distinct from other factors which affect integration efficiency. The former, however, may be primarily responsible for the inefficiency of heterospecific transformation.

One of the hybrid DNAs was used to obtain a second generation of hybrids by passing it through each of the original parental strains. Tests of the DNAs extracted from 24 independently produced, second-generation hybrids showed that hybrid DNA is subject to further alteration by a second integration involving some heterologous confrontation. The probability of such alteration appears to be increased if the second integration is accompanied by linkage reduction.