Skip to main content
Log in

Isolation and cell regeneration of protoplasts from sugar pine (Pinus lambertiana)

  • Published:
Plant Cell Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Protoplasts were isolated at high yields from actively growing callus and cell suspensions of cotyledons and needles of mature trees. The best protoplast growth response was obtained from cell suspensions of cotyledon and needle callus. Lower protoplast yields were obtained directly from young needles of flushing buds on explants from mature shoots (30-year-old trees) growing in vitro. In all cases, the first divisions, promoted by dimethyl sulfoxide, were observed in 10–45% of the protoplasts by 7–10 days. After 25–30 days, colonies of 8–10 cells were established. Browning of protoplast-derived cell cultures was observed within 40–45 days (cotyledons) and 20–25 days (mature tree sources).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

BA:

N6-Benzyladenine

DCR:

Douglas-fir cotyledon revised medium

2,4-D:

2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid

DMSO:

dimethyl sulfoxide

FDA:

Fluorescein diacetate

Mes:

2-(N-morpholino) ethanesulfonic acid

NAA:

α-naphthaleneacetic acid

References

  • Ahuja MR (1984) Silvae Genetica 33:32–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boller T, Kende T (1976) Plant Physiol. 63:1123–1132.

    Google Scholar 

  • David A, David H (1979) z. Pflanzenphysiol 94:1652–1657

    Google Scholar 

  • David H, Jarlet E, David A (1984) Physiol. Plant. 61:477–482.

    Google Scholar 

  • Durzan DJ (1980) In 50th Anniversary, May 8–10, 1979, The Institute of Paper Chemistry, Appleton, WI, pp. 31–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gupta PK, Durzan DJ (1986) Bio/Technology, 4:643–645.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gupta PK, Durzan DJ (1985) Plant Cell Rept. 4:177–179.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hahne G, Hoffman F (1984) Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 81:5449–5453.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hakman, IC, von Arnold S (1983) Plant Cell Rept. 2:92–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hakman I, von Arnold S (1985) J. Plant Physiol. 121:149–158.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen WA (1962) In Botanical histochemistry, principles and practice. W.A. Freeman, San Francisco.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kinloch BB Jr., Parks GK, Fowler CW (1970) Science 167:193–195.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirby EG, Cheng TY (1979) Plant Sci. Lett. 14:145–154.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patel KR, Shekhawat RS, Berlyn AP, Thorpe TA (1984) Plant Cell Tiss. Organ Cult. 3:85–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rao PS, Atkins PO (1985) Protoplasma 124:80–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steward FC, Krikorian AD (1970) In WR Sharp, PO Larsen, EF Paddock, V Raghavan (eds.). Plant cell and tissue culture, principles and application. Ohio State Univ. Press, Columbus, pp. 221–262.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vasil IK, Vasil V (1980) In IK Vasil (ed.), Perspectives in plant cell and tissue culture. Intl. Rev. Cytol., Academic Press, New York, pp. 1–19.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Communicated by O. L. Gamborg

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gupta, P.K., Don Durzan, J. Isolation and cell regeneration of protoplasts from sugar pine (Pinus lambertiana). Plant Cell Reports 5, 346–348 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00268598

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00268598

Keywords

Navigation