Skip to main content
Log in

Retention of the capacity to produce plants from protoplasts in cryopreserved cell lines of rice (Oryza sativa L.)

  • Published:
Plant Cell Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A method is described for cryopreservation of cell suspension lines of rice (Oryza sativa L.) for use in protoplast research and as a way of retaining desirable characteristics of cell lines. The procedure involves pre-culture with mannitol, addition of a cryoprotectant solution of sucrose, dimethyl sulfoxide, glycerol and L-proline, two step freezing and storage in liquid nitrogen. Cells have been preserved for up to 14 months (the longest period tried in these experiments). Cryopreserved cells proliferated after plating on solid medium and new cell suspensions could be initiated within 15 days. Viable protoplasts, capable of divisions and callus formation, could be obtained 15–21 days after thawing. Variation between cell lines in terms of recovery rate after cryopreservation occurred. Differences between cell lines in plating efficiencies on solidified medium, however, contributed to this variation. Protoplasts from cryopreserved regenerable cell lines gave rise to embryogenic callus from which plants could be regenerated. These plants developed to maturity. A transformed cell line was also cryopreserved and it had retained the hygromycin resistance and regenerative capacity of the original cell line.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

DMSO:

dimethyl sulfoxide

2,4-D:

2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid

NAA:

1-naphtylacetic acid

FDA:

fluorescein diacetate

References

  • Anchordoguy TJ, Rudolph AS, Carpenter JF, Crowe JH (1987) Cryobiology 14: 324–331.

    Google Scholar 

  • Abdullah R, Cocking EC, Thompson JA (1986) Biotechnology 4: 1087–1090.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter JF, Crowe JH (1988) Cryobiology 25: 244–255.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cella R, Colombo R, Galli MG, Nielsen E, Rollo F, Sala F (1982) Physiol Plant 55: 279–294.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chu CC, Wang CC, Sun CS, Hsu C, Yin KC, Chu CY (1975) Sci Sinica 18: 659–668.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finkle BJ, Ulrich JM (1982) Cryobiology 19: 329–335.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fujimura T, Sakurai M, Akagi H, Negishi T, Hirose A (1985) Plant Tissue Cult. Lett. 2: 74–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grout BWW (1990) In: Nijkamp HJ, van der Plas, LHW, van Aartrijk, J (eds) Progress in Plant Cellular and Molecular Biology. Kluwer Acad. Publ., Dordrecht, The Netherlands, pp13–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hellergren J, Li PH (1981) Physiol Plant 52: 449–453.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kao KN (1977) Molec Gen Genet 15: 225–230.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuriyama A, Watanabe K, Ueno S, Mitsuda H (1989) Plant Sci 64: 231–235.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kyozuka J, Hayashi Y, Shimamoto K (1987) Molec Gen Genet 206: 408–413.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larkin PJ, Scowcroft WR (1981) Theor Appl Genet 60: 197–214.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li Z, Murai N (1990) Plant Cell Rep 9: 216–220.

    Google Scholar 

  • Linsmaier EM, Skoog F (1965) Physiol Plant 18: 100–116.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Meijer EGM, Schilperoort RA, Rueb S, Van Os-Ruygrok PE, Hensgens LAM (1991) Plant Mol Biol (In press).

  • Müller AJ, Grafe R (1978) Molec Gen Genet 161: 67–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Negrutiu I, Shillito R, Potrykus I, Biasini G, Sala F (1987) Plant Mol Biol 8: 363–373.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ogura H, Kyozuka J, Hayashi Y, Koba T, Shimamoto K (1987) Theor Appl Genet 87: 670–676.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips RL, Kaeppler SM, Pescheke VM (1990) In: Nijkamp HJJ, van der Plas LHW, van Aartrijk J (eds) Progress in Plant Cellular and Molecular Biology. Kluwer Acad Publ, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, pp 131–141.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sala F, Cella R, Rollo F (1979) Physiol Plant 45: 170–176.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shimamoto K, Tereda R, Izawa T, Fujimoto H (1989) Nature 338: 274–276.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson JA, Abdullah R, Cocking EC (1986) Plant Sci 47: 123–133.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toriyama K, Arimoto Y, Uchimiya H, Hinata K (1988) Biotechnology 6: 1072–1074.

    Google Scholar 

  • Withers LA (1987) In: Grout BWW, Morris GJ (eds) The Effects of Low Temperatures on Biolological Systems, Edward Arnold, London UK, 389–109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Withers LA, King PJ (1979) Plant Physiol 64: 675–678.

    Google Scholar 

  • Withers LA, King PJ (1980) Cryo-Letters 1: 213–220.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang HM, Yang H, Rech EL, Golds TJ, Davis AS, Mulligan BJ, Cocking EC, Davey MR (1988a) Plant Cell Rep 7: 379–384.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang W, Wu R (1988b) Theor Appl Genet 76: 835–840.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Communicated by P. J. King

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Meijer, E.G.M., van Iren, F., Schrijnemakers, E. et al. Retention of the capacity to produce plants from protoplasts in cryopreserved cell lines of rice (Oryza sativa L.). Plant Cell Reports 10, 171–174 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00234288

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00234288

Keywords

Navigation