Skip to main content
Log in

Hydrophobic interaction of soluble 3′:5′ cyclic nucleotide phosphodiesterase with octyl-sepharose

  • General Articles
  • Published:
Molecular and Cellular Biochemistry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Soluble cyclic nucleotide 3′:5′ monophosphate phosphodiesterase (PDE) (EC 3.1.4.17) obtained from beef adrenal cortex as the 100,000 g/1.5 h supernatant is usually regarded as a very hydrophilic protein. However, when subjected to hydrophobic chromatography on Octyl-Sepharose CL 413 it reveals strong hydrophobic interaction with the column matrix. The chromatographic procedure leads to multiple but distinct forms of PDE which degrade cAMP beyond 5′AMP to inosine, via adenosine. The same metabolic pathway was previously observed with a membrane bound multienzyme sequence. Even the soluble PDE forms separated by gel chromatography (Sephadex G 200, Sepharose S 200 and Sepharose 6B) and soluble PDE of other tissue (heart) displayed the same metabolic pattern. These findings indicate a linkage between PDE, nucleotidase and deaminase activities. The intimate association of the enzyme is additionally supported by the phenomenon of “kinetic advantage” clearly observed with the most hydrophobic PDE form. Its end product, inosine, is formed more rapidly from CAMP than from the intermediate 5′AMP. This paradoxical phenomenon is explained by close physical proximity between the enzymes involved in the metabolic pathway. Furthermore, when the most hydrophobic PDE form was immobilized on Octyl-Sepharose, rather than loss of catalytic activity even higher enzyme activities were measured. It is suggested that the so-called multiple forms of soluble PDE-at least in part-represent more or less preserved forms of a native, membrane bound, multienzyme sequence which degrades cyclic nucleotides.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Drummond, G. I. and Perrott-Yee, S., 1961. J. Biol. Chem. 236, 1126–1129.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Nair, K. G., 1965. Biochemistry 5, 150–157.

    Google Scholar 

  3. DeRobertis, E., Arnaiz, G. R. D. I., Alberici, A., Butcher, R. W. and Sutherland, E. W., 1967. J. Biol. Chem. 242, 3487–3493.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Butcher, R. W. and Sutherland, E. W., 1962. J. Biol. Chem. 237, 1244–1250.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Cheung, W. Y. and Salganicoff, L., 1967. Nature 214, 90–91.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Wombacher, H., 1980, Arch. Biochem. Biophys. (in the press).

  7. Cheung, W. Y., 1970. In Advan. in Biochem. Psychopharmacology (ed. Greengard, P. and Costa, E.) Vol. 3 Role of cyclic AMP in Cell Function pp. 51–65, Raven Press. New York.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Wells, J. N. and Hardman, J. G., 1977. In “Advances in Cyclic Nucleotide Research” (ed. Greengrad, P. and Robison, G. A.) Vol. 8, pp. 119–143, Raven Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Reuter-Smerdka, M. and Wombacher, H., 1978. 12th FEBS Meeting, Dresden, Abstract No.: 1257.

  10. Wombacher, H., 1978. 12th FEBS Meeting, Dresden, Abstract No.: 1258.

  11. Wombacher. H., 1978. FEBS Lett. 85, 77–80.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Peter, H. W. and Wolf, H. U., 1973. J. Chromat. 82, 15–30.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Lowry, O. H., Rosebrough, N. J., Farr, A. L. and Randall, R. J., 1951. J. Biol. Chem. 193, 265–275.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. von der Haar, F., 1978. In “Theory and Practice in Affinity Techniques” (ed. Sundaram, P. V. and Eckstein, F.) p. 1–13 Academic Press, London, New York, San Francisco.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Wilchek, M. and Miron, T., 1976. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 72, 108–113.

    Google Scholar 

  16. King, T. P., 1972. Biochemistry, 11, 367–371.

    Google Scholar 

  17. von der Haar, F., 1976. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 70, 1009–1013.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Pichard, A. L. and Cheung, W. Y., 1977. J. Biol. Chem. 252, 4872–4875.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Cheung, W. Y., 1970. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 38, 533–538.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Cheung, W. Y., 1971. J. Biol. Chem. 246, 2858–2869.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Kakiuchi, S., Yamazaki, R. and Nakajima, H., 1970. Proc. Jap. Acad. 46, 587–592.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Dumler, I. L. and Etingof, R. N., 1976. Biochem. Biophys. Acta 429, 474–484.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Wang, J. H. and Desai, R., 1976. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 72, 926–932.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Ho, R. J., Russel, T. R., Asakawa, T. and Hucks, M. W., 1975. J. Cyclic Nucl. Res. 1, 81–88.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Filburn, C. R. and Sacktor, B., 1976. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 174, 249–261.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Strada, S. J. and Thompson, W. J., 1978. In “Advances in Cyclic Nucleotide Research” (ed. George, W. J. and Ignarro, D. J.) Vol. 9 pp. 265–283, Raven Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wombacher, H. Hydrophobic interaction of soluble 3′:5′ cyclic nucleotide phosphodiesterase with octyl-sepharose. Mol Cell Biochem 30, 157–164 (1980). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00230169

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00230169

Keywords

Navigation